Remove this Banner Ad

Defensive Match-Ups

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sera

Club Legend
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
2,182
Reaction score
1
Location
Indian Ocean
Other Teams
Fremantle Dockers
Although getting our forward line to function will be critical to us winning, so will our defensive match-ups. This is what i would do, how about you?

Medhurst – Chick – Medhurst gets most of his goals from out-positioning his opponent. I think we need someone who can beat him at his own game. Chick found his niche in defence against the crows and has the pace to stay with him on the lead. Green did well on him in the preseason so he would also be a chance.

Farmer – Wirrapunda – I would put Wirra on him as he has a good record against farmer and soundly beat a similar type in Ronnie Burns last week. However, I think the Eagles will actually go for more of a negator such as Braun.

Croad – Carroll – Seems the perfect match-up in terms of size and speed. Carroll tore Croad a new a$$hole in the pre-season so he deserves the chance to tear him a third one.

Longmuir – Milli – Longmuir isn’t back to full-fitness just yet and hasn’t regained his full mobility. Because of this he will probably play close to goal and so Macca would be a good match-up [I feel] in the body-to-body positioning he will try to play.

Sh*thouse – Anyone, it doesn’t matter. Morrison maybe.

Headland – If Headland goes forward, I would be tempted to play a similar size player on him such as Morrison. If Collica is back, I’d probably play him instead. If worst comes to worst, we can always put embers on him.

Sandilands – If Sandilands plays up forward, all the better for us. A tall hack is still a hack. Milli or Cox will play on him.

Pavlich – If he plays at CHF put Jacko on him. If he plays FF, Milli or Glass. Pavlich is their best chance of creating a miss-match in the forward line and if I was Connelly, I would play him here.
 
Originally posted by Sera
Although getting our forward line to function will be critical to us winning, so will our defensive match-ups. This is what i would do, how about you?

Medhurst – Chick – Medhurst gets most of his goals from out-positioning his opponent. I think we need someone who can beat him at his own game. Chick found his niche in defence against the crows and has the pace to stay with him on the lead. Green did well on him in the preseason so he would also be a chance.

Farmer – Wirrapunda – I would put Wirra on him as he has a good record against farmer and soundly beat a similar type in Ronnie Burns last week. However, I think the Eagles will actually go for more of a negator such as Braun.

Croad – Carroll – Seems the perfect match-up in terms of size and speed. Carroll tore Croad a new a$$hole in the pre-season so he deserves the chance to tear him a third one.

Longmuir – Milli – Longmuir isn’t back to full-fitness just yet and hasn’t regained his full mobility. Because of this he will probably play close to goal and so Macca would be a good match-up [I feel] in the body-to-body positioning he will try to play.

Sh*thouse – Anyone, it doesn’t matter. Morrison maybe.

Headland – If Headland goes forward, I would be tempted to play a similar size player on him such as Morrison. If Collica is back, I’d probably play him instead. If worst comes to worst, we can always put embers on him.

Sandilands – If Sandilands plays up forward, all the better for us. A tall hack is still a hack. Milli or Cox will play on him.

Pavlich – If he plays at CHF put Jacko on him. If he plays FF, Milli or Glass. Pavlich is their best chance of creating a miss-match in the forward line and if I was Connelly, I would play him here.

You my freind Are clutching at straws & really have no idea whats going on !!!

Just a possible scenario... What if CC opts for Medhurst to start at CHF.... To basicallly leave him in an open corridor does JW opt to play Jako on him where he will have his sorry Watsonia arse run off him & Medders does as his pleases or play Chick as you said and have 3 leading options with slow arse WCE players lagging behind with a crumber and Medders waiting in the wings
 
Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
You my freind Are clutching at straws & really have no idea whats going on !!!

Just a possible scenario... What if CC opts for Medhurst to start at CHF.... To basicallly leave him in an open corridor does JW opt to play Jako on him where he will have his sorry Watsonia arse run off him & Medders does as his pleases or play Chick as you said and have 3 leading options with slow arse WCE players lagging behind with a crumber and Medders waiting in the wings

Chick would be fine on the flying tampon. As for the 3 leading options they would be who?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
Just a possible scenario... What if CC opts for Medhurst to start at CHF.... To basicallly leave him in an open corridor does JW opt to play Jako on him where he will have his sorry Watsonia arse run off him & Medders does as his pleases or play Chick as you said and have 3 leading options with slow arse WCE players lagging behind with a crumber and Medders waiting in the wings

We can only hope Medhurst starts at CHF.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
Clive , Croad , J Lo

Clive used all his energy against the Roos and will fall in a screaming heap on the weekend

Croad and leading in the same sentence just does't work :p

J Lo is a better dancer than she is a leader :D
 
Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Sera
We can only hope Medhurst starts at CHF.

More likely on a half forward flank where he can use his excekkent spotting of a leading forward. This IMO is his best spot as we got 3 or 4 goals from him passing to a free forward.

Get ready for another bag of seven from Clive.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by RIPPER_46
Get ready for another bag of seven from Clive.

Yeah 7 kicks is about his average for 2003
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by West Coast Stre
Clive used all his energy against the Roos and will fall in a screaming heap on the weekend

Croad and leading in the same sentence just does't work :p

J Lo is a better dancer than she is a leader :D

Very good summary of our forwards , you may aswell provide a pack of cards and a poker table for you defenders cause I guess they'll have stuff all to do all nite ;)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by RIPPER_46
More likely on a half forward flank where he can use his excekkent spotting of a leading forward. This IMO is his best spot as we got 3 or 4 goals from him passing to a free forward.

So you disagree with Freo Hitman who thinks he should start at CHF? :D
 
Ahh well, so much for me trying to start a serious thread without the freo trolls hi-jacking it. Maybe next time I will know better.
 
Originally posted by Sera
Ahh well, so much for me trying to start a serious thread without the freo trolls hi-jacking it. Maybe next time I will know better.

Not during Derby week mate. Its a tradition here, anything goes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by West Coast Stre
Yeah 7 kicks is about his average for 2003

Its a good sign then - 7 kicks for Clive normally equals 3-4 goals
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Sera
So you disagree with Freo Hitman who thinks he should start at CHF? :D
I didnt say he would start at CHF , I was saying dont be surprised if he gets a run there to open up the corridor
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
Its a good sign then - 7 kicks for Clive normally equals 3-4 goals

Not this year it doesn't. Unless that waterbottle snuck through for a goal :D
 
Originally posted by Sera
Ahh well, so much for me trying to start a serious thread without the freo trolls hi-jacking it. Maybe next time I will know better.


Pfft, if you wanted a serious discussion, you wouldn't have referred to Waterhouse as Sh*thouse.
 
Originally posted by Kenny_01
Pfft, if you wanted a serious discussion, you wouldn't have referred to Waterhouse as Sh*thouse.

Just going on what Docker fans call him. You know its true.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by Kenny_01
Pfft, if you wanted a serious discussion, you wouldn't have referred to Waterhouse as Sh*thouse.

Kenny I think they are clutching badly !!!
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
I didnt say he would start at CHF , I was saying dont be surprised if he gets a run there to open up the corridor

Wowzers penny. Really? You don't say?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Sera
Wowzers penny. Really? You don't say?

With comments like this you really dont want me quizzing you about your sexuality either !!
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defensive Match-Ups

Originally posted by Freo Hitman
With comments like this you really dont want me quizzing you about your sexuality either !!

I'm not the one wearing purple :D
 
Originally posted by RIPPER_46
Really that 25 goal effort was just a dress rehersal for this week.
they are working on converting at least half of those 18 pts as well so the target is 34 9 and a new record score. :D

Come-on, surely you blokes have a comeback for the purple thing? Go the vader thing again... :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom