Didak...

[Dramoth]

What a dirty cheating excuse for a human being.

Smashed Scotland and will go for a row for that one... deliberate and with malicious intent. He went in with his shoulder low and after the initial contact raised his elbow.

One that he will possibly get away with, is the headbutt on Lance that caused Red to throw him to the ground and give away that second goal.

But then again... Didak proudly wears a collingwood jumper... a team well renowned for being a bunch of dirty cheating scum.

Holland will also go for the initial punch that let to Bannister clocking him... pity Bannister didnt do a decent job and break the cheats jaw while he was at it.

If you do something that is going to get you reported on trial by video... make certain that their player is going to be out for at least as long as you are.

 

[stokesy]

I'd have Didak in our side...

We can be dirty and all the rest, but it certainly added to the game. I'm not worried we lost, but I'm happy with the game in general - bar umpiring - it shows how strong our rivalry still is with the Pies

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

still ... was good to see Fev fk him up

 

[j-ham]

Ever heard the expression "Great head for Collingwood"?

Ugly little rat.

 

[trueblue_91]

What a dirty cheating excuse for a human being.

Smashed Scotland and will go for a row for that one... deliberate and with malicious intent. He went in with his shoulder low and after the initial contact raised his elbow.

One that he will possibly get away with, is the headbutt on Lance that caused Red to throw him to the ground and give away that second goal.

But then again... Didak proudly wears a collingwood jumper... a team well renowned for being a bunch of dirty cheating scum.

Holland will also go for the initial punch that let to Bannister clocking him... pity Bannister didnt do a decent job and break the cheats jaw while he was at it.

If you do something that is going to get you reported on trial by video... make certain that their player is going to be out for at least as long as you are.

Dont worry the weekends over and Didak is now back in the zoo were he belongs

 

[Lonie_from_50]

Obviously there is a rival between the two clubs, and obviously most AFL supporters are Anti-Collingwood, which is somewhat nothing to worry about. Then again, I am not going against my powers on this board (hopefully), but you are calling Collingwood 'cheating' scum. Now, as I said, I am not dishing it out, but only sticking up for my club while I ventrured next door. We have never cheated, yet we do have a dirty side to some of our players (Holland is one, Didak has ruined his reputation in what will likely be a 2-3 week suspension in my mind), but we have never once cheated (for my memory) yet I know a club that has.

What I can say is though, on top of that is that Collingwood got on a roll after some goalsquare free kicks, but umpires never made the mistake. Contact to the head means free kick in the rule book, and Collingwood, thanks to Didak, were on a receiving end of a fantastic team effort from the Blues in sticking up for a team-mate, but our boys stuck with the game while your mob continued to look for trouble, hence Whitnall and Bannister.

To finish, a great effort today form you guys who gave us a real tough fought game, and I guess luckily for us we came away with the points, and the result in the book doesn't represent the game your mob played. The Didak incident will be talked about for days in detail, and continue on his reputation over his career in the Carl v Coll games, however, it was good to see Heath Scotland come out (aswell as Didak) in coming into agreement, apologies done on the field as soon as it could be said and was done several times by Didak, and Scotland somewhat stood up for what is a part of aussie rules footy (the hip and shoulder) and Didak just didn't have the luck in a superior hip and shoulder and instead turned out to be a sniper.

BTW - Just on the elbow....what elbow?

 

[4blues]

Obviously there is a rival between the two clubs, and obviously most AFL supporters are Anti-Collingwood, which is somewhat nothing to worry about. Then again, I am not going against my powers on this board (hopefully), but you are calling Collingwood 'cheating' scum. Now, as I said, I am not dishing it out, but only sticking up for my club while I ventrured next door. We have never cheated, yet we do have a dirty side to some of our players (Holland is one, Didak has ruined his reputation in what will likely be a 2-3 week suspension in my mind), but we have never once cheated (for my memory) yet I know a club that has.

What I can say is though, on top of that is that Collingwood got on a roll after some goalsquare free kicks, but umpires never made the mistake. Contact to the head means free kick in the rule book, and Collingwood, thanks to Didak, were on a receiving end of a fantastic team effort from the Blues in sticking up for a team-mate, but our boys stuck with the game while your mob continued to look for trouble, hence Whitnall and Bannister.

To finish, a great effort today form you guys who gave us a real tough fought game, and I guess luckily for us we came away with the points, and the result in the book doesn't represent the game your mob played. The Didak incident will be talked about for days in detail, and continue on his reputation over his career in the Carl v Coll games, however, it was good to see Heath Scotland come out (aswell as Didak) in coming into agreement, apologies done on the field as soon as it could be said and was done several times by Didak, and Scotland somewhat stood up for what is a part of aussie rules footy (the hip and shoulder) and Didak just didn't have the luck in a superior hip and shoulder and instead turned out to be a sniper.

BTW - Just on the elbow....what elbow?

Obviously forgot that you fessed up when the AFL had the amnisty, as for Didak that little feral scumbag should get at least 3, but being a collingwood player, will probley get off. And what draft pick did collingwood use to get Goldspink??????????

 

[j-ham]

Back in your cage feral.

 

[blues4flag]

Ugly little rat.

 

[BlueBelle]

Obviously there is a rival between the two clubs, and obviously most AFL supporters are Anti-Collingwood, which is somewhat nothing to worry about. Then again, I am not going against my powers on this board (hopefully), but you are calling Collingwood 'cheating' scum. Now, as I said, I am not dishing it out, but only sticking up for my club while I ventrured next door. We have never cheated, yet we do have a dirty side to some of our players (Holland is one, Didak has ruined his reputation in what will likely be a 2-3 week suspension in my mind), but we have never once cheated (for my memory) yet I know a club that has.

What I can say is though, on top of that is that Collingwood got on a roll after some goalsquare free kicks, but umpires never made the mistake. Contact to the head means free kick in the rule book, and Collingwood, thanks to Didak, were on a receiving end of a fantastic team effort from the Blues in sticking up for a team-mate, but our boys stuck with the game while your mob continued to look for trouble, hence Whitnall and Bannister.

To finish, a great effort today form you guys who gave us a real tough fought game, and I guess luckily for us we came away with the points, and the result in the book doesn't represent the game your mob played. The Didak incident will be talked about for days in detail, and continue on his reputation over his career in the Carl v Coll games, however, it was good to see Heath Scotland come out (aswell as Didak) in coming into agreement, apologies done on the field as soon as it could be said and was done several times by Didak, and Scotland somewhat stood up for what is a part of aussie rules footy (the hip and shoulder) and Didak just didn't have the luck in a superior hip and shoulder and instead turned out to be a sniper.

BTW - Just on the elbow....what elbow?

Have you looked at the replay buddy? She certainly had her elbow up after the initial contact.

 

[4blues]

Ever heard the expression "Great head for Collingwood"?

Ugly little rat.

Short legs and a long body, we could paint his face Blue and call him a Smurf.

 

[stokesy]

Just for the record, I thought it was a superb hit and no matter when they occur, I love seeing it even if it is one of our own being knocked out.

 

[Lonie_from_50]

Obviously forgot that you fessed up when the AFL had the amnisty, as for Didak that little feral scumbag should get at least 3, but being a collingwood player, will probley get off. And what draft pick did collingwood use to get Goldspink??????????

Back in your cage feral.

Pretty pathetic.

I come on here to have a constructive say and I get this, which is somewhat expected, however, called a feral, I can accept that, but then seeing you bunch becoming 'sore losers' actually blaming the umpires in a pathetic mind is quite ridiculous. Umpires are and always will be maggots to any side who plays the sport, from Yarranga U-8's to Carlton FC. To blame the result on umpires is just a little too much. I said in constructive form, thanks for the contest (or along those lines) yet, I guess this tops it off.

 

[Lonie_from_50]

Have you looked at the replay buddy? She certainly had her elbow up after the initial contact.

Didak may be holding a chainsaw at present time, yet it is after the contact, so is irrelevant isn't it. Pretty bad example, but after the contact is not during the contact, therefore, it shouldn't be bought up. Here is a pic atleast 1 second after the contact.

 

[Lonie_from_50]

Just for the record, I thought it was a superb hit and no matter when they occur, I love seeing it even if it is one of our own being knocked out.

Good call stokesy. As I have said, a 2-3 week suspension and a reputation on the line from the Blues outer, and that's fair enough for something Didak apologised for several times and will do 'his time'. Scotland liked it, so why not say it was good for the game

 

[j-ham]

Geez... Lighten up champ, was only a bit of good natured banter.

Now get back in your cage.

 

[4blues]

If you dont like what we say on OUR board, **** off back to your own, Tosser from 50.

 

[BlueBelle]

Didak may be holding a chainsaw at present time, yet it is after the contact, so is irrelevant isn't it. Pretty bad example, but after the contact is not during the contact, therefore, it shouldn't be bought up. Here is a pic atleast 1 second after the contact.

Yes, as I said, it was after the initial contact but was still there. Have a nice holiday is all I can say! Maybe he can take the pies good old mate Goldspink with him, considering he won't get a game next week either!

 

[AlecDuncan]

Smashed Scotland and will go for a row for that one... deliberate and with malicious intent. He went in with his shoulder low and after the initial contact raised his elbow.

Free kick for head high contact, but not reportable - at least not by a sane tribunal system.

He did momentarily think about using his elbow before contact, but tucked it in just in time. Going in low is what the authorities want you to do - less chance of collecting the head that way.

But if I was coach, I would have dragged him for bumping instead of tackling ;-).

 

[Lonie_from_50]

If you dont like what we say on OUR board, **** off back to your own, Tosser from 50.

Top call, I guess you already heard/saw the call of my user name today,

I said, I was making a statement abiding by zero tolerence, and i never went against it, blah blah. I came on here like I come on here frequently, but because the Pies were being called cheaters etc. I thought I would have my say as I can.

Obviously I'm not welcome on here, as it seems with your appropriate comebacks, and I think I have made my case, and will visit to see the replies and see if anyone is as arrogant and sore as some of you, despite the acknowledgement by myself to your own.

Thanks, Lonie.

 

[BlueBelle]

Top call, I guess you already heard/saw the call of my user name today,

I said, I was making a statement abiding by zero tolerence, and i never went against it, blah blah. I came on here like I come on here frequently, but because the Pies were being called cheaters etc. I thought I would have my say as I can.

Obviously I'm not welcome on here, as it seems with your appropriate comebacks, and I think I have made my case, and will visit to see the replies and see if anyone is as arrogant and sore as some of you, despite the acknowledgement by myself to your own.

Thanks, Lonie.

Ha ha! I think 4blues summed it up pretty well when he called you a tosser!!

 

[Armageddon]

What a dirty cheating excuse for a human being.

Smashed Scotland and will go for a row for that one... deliberate and with malicious intent. He went in with his shoulder low and after the initial contact raised his elbow.

One that he will possibly get away with, is the headbutt on Lance that caused Red to throw him to the ground and give away that second goal.

But then again... Didak proudly wears a collingwood jumper... a team well renowned for being a bunch of dirty cheating scum.

Holland will also go for the initial punch that let to Bannister clocking him... pity Bannister didnt do a decent job and break the cheats jaw while he was at it.

If you do something that is going to get you reported on trial by video... make certain that their player is going to be out for at least as long as you are.

Always two sides to the story young man

Great game of footy though and not htat much in the incident, on a good day will get off on a bad might get a couple

 

[romper]

What I can say is though, on top of that is that Collingwood got on a roll after some goalsquare free kicks, but umpires never made the mistake. Contact to the head means free kick in the rule book, and Collingwood, thanks to Didak, were on a receiving end of a fantastic team effort from the Blues in sticking up for a team-mate, but our boys stuck with the game while your mob continued to look for trouble, hence Whitnall and Bannister.

Well it was contact to the head so it should have been a free kick. But wouldnt you think the f**k head umpire would of gave em the free kick in the centre circle as this head contact did occur after the goal not before.
Goldspink deserves a bullet to the head.

 

[BlueBelle]

Well it was contact to the head so it should have been a free kick. But wouldnt you think the f**k head umpire would of gave em the free kick in the centre circle as this head contact did occur after the goal not before.
Goldspink deserves a bullet to the head.

Not only was it a free kick but because she was reported, it should have been a 50 metre penalty as well, and it wasn't. Umpires = dirty rats! Nevertheless, Eddie kicked goal of the year

 

[AlecDuncan]

Not only was it a free kick but because she was reported, it should have been a 50 metre penalty as well, and it wasn't. Umpires = dirty rats! Nevertheless, Eddie kicked goal of the year

They don't give a 50m penalty on a report any more. That went out a few years ago.