- Joined
- Feb 2, 2007
- Posts
- 1,360
- Reaction score
- 349
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Rugby
In the last 2 drafts, we’ve seen Jason Porplyzia (PSD), Nick Gill (64) and Bryce Campbell (80) picked up by the AFC with late picks. Whilst Gill and Campbell have not debuted as yet they seem likely, physically mature types, that at the very least should add significant depth to the list. They also bring with them, numerous seasons worth of SANFL experience playing against more mature bodies.
Looking at West Coast, they have reaped handsome dividends from drafting Sandover medallist Priddis, Brisbane took Joel Patfull who slipped straight in and Matthew Stokes (too small for AFL!) has played some good solid footy for Geelong. All these players were taken late in their respective drafts, after developing in their local leagues. They weren’t -youngsters- in AFL terms, but still have enough footy in them to contribute for a long time yet.
I also noted last year when we were talking about trading Skipworth to North, North supporters wanted to take a chance on pick 53 in the draft as opposed to trading, an attitude that many Victorian teams seem to be adopting. We all know that, historically speaking, kids taken in the fourth round have a low strike rate in becoming quality players. A team full of kids can also leave clubs vulnerable when injuries strike and the depth of the club is exposed.
]My question – Are many non-victorian clubs starting to realise the value (at least with later picks) of picking more physically mature guys in their early 20’s from the local leagues (SANFL, WAFL or whatever), knowing they have experience at playing against men and can slot straight in to the 22 if required?
What does everyone else think ?
Looking at West Coast, they have reaped handsome dividends from drafting Sandover medallist Priddis, Brisbane took Joel Patfull who slipped straight in and Matthew Stokes (too small for AFL!) has played some good solid footy for Geelong. All these players were taken late in their respective drafts, after developing in their local leagues. They weren’t -youngsters- in AFL terms, but still have enough footy in them to contribute for a long time yet.
I also noted last year when we were talking about trading Skipworth to North, North supporters wanted to take a chance on pick 53 in the draft as opposed to trading, an attitude that many Victorian teams seem to be adopting. We all know that, historically speaking, kids taken in the fourth round have a low strike rate in becoming quality players. A team full of kids can also leave clubs vulnerable when injuries strike and the depth of the club is exposed.
]My question – Are many non-victorian clubs starting to realise the value (at least with later picks) of picking more physically mature guys in their early 20’s from the local leagues (SANFL, WAFL or whatever), knowing they have experience at playing against men and can slot straight in to the 22 if required?
What does everyone else think ?







