JB1975
Brownlow Medallist
Give me one example of how Collingwood may have been negligent? Or more if you have some.
She was injured and had 3 weeks off before returning.
Forced to play?
So you're answering my question with a question. Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give me one example of how Collingwood may have been negligent? Or more if you have some.
She was injured and had 3 weeks off before returning.
Forced to play?
Give me one example of how Collingwood may have been negligent? Or more if you have some.
She was injured and had 3 weeks off before returning.
Forced to play?
I've stated my point several times.So you're answering my question with a question. Thanks.
Oh thank you wise one.The only certainty so far is your incessant posting on the matter which is pretty revealing. Which isn’t pretty.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I want to see what she has to say on Collingwood being negligent.
Essendon was a special case. Absolute disgrace what happened there.It'd be nice if this was your only position, instead of accusing her of being a money grubber and telling us that you just can't believe a modern AFL club (including Essendon, I'm sure) can be in any way negligent.
The issue at hand would be how the injury was managed, and what care was afforded her in the recovery from the injury, rather then the injury itself. So I would assume the argument will be made on how she was treated for.hopefully judges rule you knowingly participated in a sport that has a high risk of concussion and accepted the risks
Essendon was a special case. Absolute disgrace what happened there.
Clubs have procedures for concussion type injuries.
We need to hear her story and my opinions are just opinions at the moment.
I trust our club followed these procedures.
No one is forced to play ever.
Go and have another cry like you did several days ago with your goodbyes to us. Weak individual that you are.The only certainty so far is your incessant posting on the matter which is pretty revealing. Which isn’t pretty.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Go and have another cry like you did several days ago with your goodbyes to us. Weak individual that you are.
A second reply? Thanks. I did abstain for a week. Deserved a sayonara. But I do bow down to your online toughness.
I am guessing you aren’t getting what is being so clearly revealed by your uninformed position on this matter?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I have no agenda on Emma. Just can't see the club not offering her the medical support needed.A second reply? Thanks. I did abstain for a week. Deserved a sayonara. But I do bow down to your online toughness.
I am guessing you aren’t getting what is being so clearly revealed by your uninformed position on this matter?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I have no agenda on Emma. Just can't see the club not offering her the medical support needed.
Ultimately she played on after a few weeks off.
I have no agenda on Emma. Just can't see the club not offering her the medical support needed.
Ultimately she played on after a few weeks off.
I think from memory I said "money money money"
Free medical care is all that should be provided to players provided the doctors are doing their jobs.You called her a money grubber!
You don't think that this suggests a determination to discredit her as a person, as well as her claim?
I think from memory I said "money money money"
Did I say "grubber"?
Free medical care is all that should be provided to players provided the doctors are doing their jobs.
Not huge payouts.
Otherwise don't play football.
But the care provided should also be decent care. It seems she feels like they could have done a lot better, though without seeing what went on its hard to say what care was given. But seems she believes it wasnt the best of care that she should've got.Free medical care is all that should be provided to players provided the doctors are doing their jobs.
Not huge payouts.
Otherwise don't play football.
Taken out of context as lawyers often do. This is what I said.Looking back, money grab was your wording.
Right now your position is uninformed. Give it a rest.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
When it comes to concussions, I've never understood why it's a mandatory 12 day break. I don't believe there is any research to show that after suffering a concussion, 12 days is the optimum break. I have read 4 weeks is more appropriate. So, why don't we make it a mandatory 4 weeks? I wonder how the players would react to that? It would be half a season in the AFLW.The issue at hand would be how the injury was managed, and what care was afforded her in the recovery from the injury, rather then the injury itself. So I would assume the argument will be made on how she was treated for.
When it comes to concussions, I've never understood why it's a mandatory 12 day break. I don't believe there is any research to show that after suffering a concussion, 12 days is the optimum break. I have read 4 weeks is more appropriate. So, why don't we make it a mandatory 4 weeks? I wonder how the players would react to that? It would be half a season in the AFLW.
I'm not disputing players' welfare, and I do believe the AFL should be contributing a % of revenue into a 'welfare' trust for the support of ex-players to assist in situations like this. However, 12 days between games is insufficient. And players need to accept possibly being forced to watch for 28 days, because the AFL has a duty to do all it can to protect the welfare of the player (and they should accept it), and of course, it's own future liabilities.
I'd really be keen to know where they got the 12 days from, like if there was some solid study done to determine this would be a good time period for them to recover or not? I'm far from an expert on the whole thing, as well as concussions and the lasting affects and the affects of 4 weeks opposed to 12 days, but to me 12 days seemed rather short considering the time period for hamstrings to recover, and other injuries. I'd have thought a head injry wouldlve been longer?When it comes to concussions, I've never understood why it's a mandatory 12 day break. I don't believe there is any research to show that after suffering a concussion, 12 days is the optimum break. I have read 4 weeks is more appropriate. So, why don't we make it a mandatory 4 weeks? I wonder how the players would react to that? It would be half a season in the AFLW.
I'm not disputing players' welfare, and I do believe the AFL should be contributing a % of revenue into a 'welfare' trust for the support of ex-players to assist in situations like this. However, 12 days between games is insufficient. And players need to accept possibly being forced to watch for 28 days, because the AFL has a duty to do all it can to protect the welfare of the player (and they should accept it), and of course, it's own future liabilities.