Society/Culture F&%$ the Police - On Philosophical Grounds

Remove this Banner Ad

May 1, 2016
28,886
56,280
AFL Club
Carlton
Okay.

There have been countless police threads on this forum. We have threads on how the criminal justice system in Victoria is soft on criminals; we have threads on police brutality in America and Australia, we have threads on crime waves and whatnot.

We have across multiple threads and topics the acronym ACAB - All Cops Are Bad - and it brought to full focus for me - in conjunction with the video below - that we don't really have a thread to discuss the police philosophically.

From time to time, I'm going to update this thread with a variety of sources, and I encourage others to do the same. The thread title will be altered around the most recent source provided, regardless of whether it's me or others providing that source.

When I do I'll do my best to acknowledge their limitations when I do. For example, the video below is solely concerning an American sociopolitical context and - to an extent - lacks application elsewhere as the US state prison system has its roots in a history of slavery which might not be present elsewhere. There is also the fact that it is definitively a biased argument, biased against police and policing.

None the less, I give you where we will begin:

 
Sooo. Turned on the video and its some rap crap that I couldn't understand what they were saying. So I turned it straight off and went and listened to Jason Aldean to cleanse myself.
 
I'm only about half way through the video so far, but it's fairly apparent that any issues people have with police and the prison systems in Australia and in the USA are based on two disparate situations.
I'm not really relating to that video much at all, but I believe more than a few here will, being even more saturated with American attitudes and premises than they are with our own.
I think that your use of that video as an opener and the premises it presents is going to bog this thread down fairly quickly.

Many of the issues have much to do with a theme that cropped up fairly early in your video, and that is respect for police. In Australia, that is very definitely decreasing, and with it, occasionally and more likely in times of prolonged stress, the quality of police responses.
I'm old enough to remember when police (in WA) didn't routinely carry guns, wore light blue uniforms of a very non-military nature, and were a lot taller and more imposing.

I'm still occasionally jolted by the difference between now and then. Being pulled over in 2023 is a lot different to being pulled over in 1985, by way of example.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #4
I'm only about half way through the video so far, but it's fairly apparent that any issues people have with police and the prison systems in Australia and in the USA are based on two disparate situations.
I'm not really relating to that video much at all, but I believe more than a few here will, being even more saturated with American attitudes and premises than they are with our own.
I think that your use of that video as an opener and the premises it presents is going to bog this thread down fairly quickly.

Many of the issues have much to do with a theme that cropped up fairly early in your video, and that is respect for police. In Australia, that is very definitely decreasing, and with it, occasionally and more likely in times of prolonged stress, the quality of police responses.
I'm old enough to remember when police (in WA) didn't routinely carry guns, wore light blue uniforms of a very non-military nature, and were a lot taller and more imposing.

I'm still occasionally jolted by the difference between now and then. Being pulled over in 2023 is a lot different to being pulled over in 1985, by way of example.
The idea with starting the thread off with that particular video is that it's as thought-provoking as it is provocative. It positions prisons in a modern context as tools of capitalism to take care of surplus population and a means of economic repression of lower classes and racial minorities in quite specific ways.

I'm working on finding my next source, which will hopefully be something approaching things from the other angle.
 
Last edited:
I find it amusing how political movements can be grounded in deep thought, complex ideas and seek to address systemic problems that appear almost too large to ever be changed, but then get boiled down to a bumper-sticker slogan which immediately turns the majority of people - even those who are most affected by the problem - totally and forever against the movement. It's like how Ted Kaczynski had some really interesting and thoughtful critiques of modern society, and decided the solution to that was to send mail bombs. Like, WTF? How did you manage that logical leap?
 
It's like how Ted Kaczynski had some really interesting and thoughtful critiques of modern society, and decided the solution to that was to send mail bombs. Like, WTF? How did you manage that logical leap?

Ted got utterly mind-f*cked through secret US government experimentation;

April 26, 2020

..Another ethically problematic study was conducted by Henry A. Murray. Murray was a professor at Harvard University and had worked for the Office of Strategic Services (the predecessor to the CIA) during World War II. He wrote “Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler,” which was the psychological analysis of Hitler that was used by the military. During this time, he also helped develop tests to screen soldiers, conducted tests on brainwashing, and determined how well soldiers could withstand interrogations. The interrogation studies included intense mock interrogations on soldiers as part of assessing the limits of their psychological breaking points (Chase, 2000).

From 1959-1962, Murray conducted such interrogation studies on Harvard undergraduates (Chase, 2000). Theodore Kaczynski, who later became known as The Unabomber, was one of the 22 participants in Murray’s study, subjected to several years of interrogations designed to psychologically break the young man...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #8
I find it amusing how political movements can be grounded in deep thought, complex ideas and seek to address systemic problems that appear almost too large to ever be changed, but then get boiled down to a bumper-sticker slogan which immediately turns the majority of people - even those who are most affected by the problem - totally and forever against the movement. It's like how Ted Kaczynski had some really interesting and thoughtful critiques of modern society, and decided the solution to that was to send mail bombs. Like, WTF? How did you manage that logical leap?
The thread's named for the video, which was named for the song by NWA.

The idea for this thread - if you read the OP - is that I or others can share resources that justify, criticize or discuss police and policing (including prisons and society) from purely a philosophical basis.

If you'd like to contribute a source, I can rename the thread (which was the idea from the get go).
 
The thread's named for the video, which was named for the song by NWA.

The idea for this thread - if you read the OP - is that I or others can share resources that justify, criticize or discuss police and policing (including prisons and society) from purely a philosophical basis.

If you'd like to contribute a source, I can rename the thread (which was the idea from the get go).
I guess my comment was more about how the underlying philosophy is communicated or turned into action, particularly in the context of the resource you posted.
 
I find it amusing how political movements can be grounded in deep thought, complex ideas and seek to address systemic problems that appear almost too large to ever be changed, but then get boiled down to a bumper-sticker slogan which immediately turns the majority of people - even those who are most affected by the problem - totally and forever against the movement. It's like how Ted Kaczynski had some really interesting and thoughtful critiques of modern society, and decided the solution to that was to send mail bombs. Like, WTF? How did you manage that logical leap?
Did his dissertation on boundary functions, he just arrived at the logical conclusions a lot quicker than others and took some rather brash actions.

Derail though,

Do like J.D vids, its interesting going back and looking at the origins of policing.
Back to australia's roots as a prison colony is food for thought, maybe it wasn't the convicts that were the problem
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top