No, they are not. A Chinese person over 6 foot 1 is an exception, but not rare. A Chinese hermaphrodite named Fred over 6 foot 1 is both an exception, and rare.Exception and rarity are one and the same
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, they are not. A Chinese person over 6 foot 1 is an exception, but not rare. A Chinese hermaphrodite named Fred over 6 foot 1 is both an exception, and rare.Exception and rarity are one and the same
Of course not- they're men.Would female contact sport players like Men to play in their league? If not, why not ?
No they're not an exception nor are they rare, not the majority certainly but neither an exception or rareA Chinese person over 6 foot 1 is an exception, but not rare
They are keeping pretty quiet about it. Like they kept pretty quiet about pay disputes. I think most of them are still in the `don't rock the boat` phase of their careers. I actually appreciate their position, if you do not want her, and speak up, you are speaking against the AFLs general policy of inclusion. Say she should be included, you are speaking up against their decision. In their position, I would be, I will just keep quiet, and deal with whatever happens.Of course not- they're men.
Would female contact sport players in the AFLw like transwomen to play in their league? I'd be surprised if they didn't.
I understand the AFL players association were consulted. Does anyone know if AFLw players were consulted?
Of course not- they're men.
Would female contact sport players in the AFLw like transwomen to play in their league? I'd be surprised if they didn't.
I understand the AFL players association were consulted. Does anyone know if AFLw players were consulted?
That's my point, why change something when it may well be worse? Changing things only to please TS athletes or for alleged 'equality' when things may not actually be equal isn't the answer. Changing things to make them better is what we should be trying to achieve. It's very possible that allowing TS footballers to compete against females disadvantages the females.But at the end of the day they’re still undebatably an apple.
Whether the genetically modified apple has an advantage over the natural one (that would be considered significant enough to warrant barring transgender athletes) is what is being discussed, and is a question that no one in the world knows the answer to; no matter what certain posters in here would like to think.
That's my point, why change something when it may well be worse? Changing things only to please TS athletes or for alleged 'equality' when things may not actually be equal isn't the answer. Changing things to make them better is what we should be trying to achieve. It's very possible that allowing TS footballers to compete against females disadvantages the females.
Early on in treatment there can be very little difference physically between a transwomen and a man... But females are happy to play with one and not the other because men are too big/strong? Doesn't make logical sense.
I'm absolutely certain that the women who play AFLW- many of whom are part of the queer community- would be a little more understanding than you.Early on in treatment there can be very little difference physically between a transwomen and a man... But females are happy to play with one and not the other because men are too big/strong? Doesn't make logical sense.
There is no inherent difference between male and female muscle, we are not seperate species. The women in the 20 to late 20s age range often played in boys comps until 14. The very good players often dominated their age group.
They stop being able to compete after puberty related changes that are almost entirely hormonal. The effect of hormones on dense slowly growing tissue like tendons and bones are slow to reverse, but muscle is not.
This idea that she has 'male muscle' is a myth. She used to have testosterone effected muscle, now she has oestrogen effected muscle.
Maybe 12 months is not completely long enough, I'm ok with that.
Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the articles. Have you thoroughly read them (I will admit, I haven't read the second, the first was hard work). Given the first generally validates my argument, but you seem to think they contradict it, I would think you haven't. Let me summarise.Actually the differences are huge.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360677/
The trailer doesn't look good.Hannah's going to be on 60 Minutes on Sunday.
I agree. And while I understand she's going through treatment etc when the average punter hears her speak I think it'll drive people away unfortunately.The trailer doesn't look good.
The editing couldn't be any worse in the trailer. It's interesting Carollota opposes pre op trans girls playing women's sports.I agree. And while I understand she's going through treatment etc when the average punter hears her speak I think it'll drive people away unfortunately.
The editing couldn't be any worse in the trailer. It's interesting Carollota opposes pre op trans girls playing women's sports.https://tenplay.com.au/channel-ten/...der-footballer-ruled-out-of-women-s-afl-draftI agree. And while I understand she's going through treatment etc when the average punter hears her speak I think it'll drive people away unfortunately.
Would you be afraid to tackle me I am 57 kgs and a trans womanI am sorry, but as a woman I feel that allowing transgender women to play women's sport (especially pre op) compromises the competition. Imagine training your guts out from a young girl to become elite only to be beaten by someone that has had testosterone aided growth for most of their life.
I could easily tackle you but you have had the op and have been on the drugs for a very long time. (I listened to your interview on 3aw) Hanna on the other hand wants to play in the AFLW and hasn't even had the op yet FFSWould you be afraid to tackle me I am 57 kgs and a trans woman
View attachment 434656
The op status seems the most contentious issue, I have coped some flack from some in the trans community for my support of the AFL,s decision with Hannah.I could easily tackle you but you have had the op and have been on the drugs for a very long time. (I listened to your interview on 3aw) Hanna on the other hand wants to play in the AFLW and hasn't even had the op yet FFS
And some estrogen. I am advocating strongly to have the current IOC guidelines for trans athletes suspended and temporarily replaced with the original Stockholm Consensus recommendations and the original trans 2003 policy until a much more clearer set of guidelines can be developed.Re 60 minutes. This is a circus. The only difference between myself and Hannah playing in the women's league is anti androgen drugs.
I've been on and off in the gym for 12 years and Hannah can squat and deadlift a lot more then me. I'd need to take PED to get close to her strength pre female hormone drugs
On VTR-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app
I applaud your efforts because as it stands I can see some sports with the "whatever it takes" attitude searching out transgender people to replace bio women because of performance.And some estrogen. I am advocating strongly to have the current IOC guidelines for trans athletes suspended and temporarily replaced with the original Stockholm Consensus recommendations and the original trans 2003 policy until a much more clearer set of guidelines can be developed.