Fleming,Hyde,Staff and Richo out this week so whose in?

[Wrenny]

In my opinion i would have Roach,Tuck,Pettifer and Shultz

B: Fiora Gasper Zantuck
HB: Hartigan A.Kellaway Chaffey
C: Tivendale Johnson Newman
HF: Bowden Morrison Hall
FF: Krakouer Shultz Brown
Foll: Ottens Cogs Campbell
Int: Tuck Pettifer Rodan Roach

 

[Coach Required]

going from who is in form apparently:

Houlihan, Pettifer & Fletcher (if you can call these 3 inclusions)
and Shulz

 

[sante]

Schulz, Roach, Tuck and Fletcher

 

[cairo tiger]

tell me why you would want to play houley doolie and pettifer. they have one good game and everyone wants them in-****! they are failed performers why will they change now-
play the kids

roach, tuck etc and bloody rodan can **** of to and get some kicks in the ressies

 

[mickctiger]

bring in Techno

 

[DirtyDogTiger]

Originally posted by cairo tiger

roach, tuck etc and bloody rodan can **** of to and get some kicks in the ressies

give the man a shovel.

 

[oxx]

Tommi Tekno for me too.

 

[DirtyDogTiger]

no way

i don't think Roach and Tuck should be brought into a losing side...when the boys are on a winning roll...give 'em a go ...get them into a winning mentality.

In: Marsh, Schulz, Pettifer
out staff, richo, hyde.

 

[julzqld]

Nooo not Pettifer, anyone else but Pettifer.

 

[rfctigerarmy]

OUT: Stafford, Richardson, Hyde, Fleming
IN: Fletcher, Schulz, Roach, Tuck

 

[WilliamPowell]

Well it appears Houlihan & Marsh are not options because they are injured

Outs: Richo, Hyde, Stafford

In: Schulz, Roach & Weller.

Ray Hall survives only because Stafford's suspended. Rodan gets the nod only because he does have pace - and can kick a goal.

 

[rfctigerarmy]

I dont think Rodan should be getting a game (and have made that clear in the past). Frawley and his team arn't strong enough on poor performances.

 

[itsintheblood]

Originally posted by julzqld
Nooo not Pettifer, anyone else but Pettifer.

I'd take pettifer b4 fleming any day. Fleming must be dropped. He adds nothing.

 

[oxx]

Re: no way

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger
i don't think Roach and Tuck should be brought into a losing side...when the boys are on a winning roll...give 'em a go ...get them into a winning mentality.

So we shouold wait until 2005 ?

Bleed them now and see what they've got Dirty Dog.

We need guys who will "step up" under adversity and atm we
have an abundance of that !

 

[kretchy]

Originally posted by cairo tiger
tell me why you would want to play houley doolie and pettifer. they have one good game and everyone wants them in-****! they are failed performers why will they change now-
play the kids

roach, tuck etc and bloody rodan can **** of to and get some kicks in the ressies

You don't want to play Pettifer and you suggest to play the kids. You include Tuck as a kid who was born before Pettifer so obviously Pettifer still qualifies as a kid as well.

 

[nineteen eighty]

FF will be the interesting position. Before Stafford was rubbed out, I would have had him at FF with Ottens continuing in the ruck and Marsh on the bench. With Stafford out, I think I would go for Zantuck at FF, Schultz the back-up and Marsh definately on the bench to give Ottens a rest. IMO, Pettifer is not the answer and has had enough chances.

The problem we have is that if our game plan is to chip the ball around until we can free someone up, then we will crucify whoever we put at FF.

 

[Arks]

umm im not a richmond supporter but I thought u guys would at least mention blumfield, he is available isn't he?