List Mgmt. Fyfe - Signed until 2023!!

[theGav56]

I think in terms of a trade IF required the " Dangerfield " trade between Adelaide/ Geelong sets the requirement.

Is Dangerfield on $1.5 million per year? I thought it was half that. Better rethink that

 

[peppy la pew]

One of the Sainters said that they could front end the offer to seal the deal.

I don't get it

 

[STK2020]

toward the end if you look back why spend time 6 match into the season talking about something might or might not happen .

High profile player i guess and its a slow news week , North Korea have gone back into their shell .

 

[STK2020]

Is Dangerfield on $1.5 million per year? I thought it was half that. Better rethink that

Im not not sure what Danger is paid but he is worth double.
I dont think it matters what a player is paid , higher the better for compo pick allocation if things turn to poo .

 

[theGav56]

Im not not sure what Danger is paid but he is worth double.
I dont think it matters what a player is paid , higher the better for compo pick allocation if things turn to poo .

He may be worth double now that he has won a Brownlow.

 

[clivenator26]

One of the Sainters said that they could front end the offer to seal the deal.

I don't get it

No thet can't. Firstly an offer has to be two years minimum. Secondly the current club only has to equal the $ value over the course of the contract.

Eg St Kilda fans may think if the offer Fyfe $2m for 1 year and then $1.5m, $1.4m, $1m, $1m that the $2m will scare us off. But we just have to pay the $6.9m over 5 years spread anyway we want.

 

[Bicco]

No thet can't. Firstly an offer has to be two years minimum. Secondly the current club only has to equal the $ value over the course of the contract.

Eg St Kilda fans may think if the offer Fyfe $2m for 1 year and then $1.5m, $1.4m, $1m, $1m that the $2m will scare us off. But we just have to pay the $6.9m over 5 years spread anyway we want.

I was under the impression that we had to match the offer exactly.

 

[clivenator26]

I was under the impression that we had to match the offer exactly.

Nope. The club is in a good position - provided he truly doesn't want to leave.

I firmly believe if he hasn't signed by end of month then he is gone, there is speculation now, he said he'd sign if things became distracting.

I am now 5% worried, I was 0.000001% worried on Monday morning.

 

[peppy la pew]

No thet can't. Firstly an offer has to be two years minimum. Secondly the current club only has to equal the $ value over the course of the contract.

Eg St Kilda fans may think if the offer Fyfe $2m for 1 year and then $1.5m, $1.4m, $1m, $1m that the $2m will scare us off. But we just have to pay the $6.9m over 5 years spread anyway we want.

I know that's why I don't get why he thinks we wouldn't match, was a bizarre thing to say

 

[STK2020]

No thet can't. Firstly an offer has to be two years minimum. Secondly the current club only has to equal the $ value over the course of the contract.

Eg St Kilda fans may think if the offer Fyfe $2m for 1 year and then $1.5m, $1.4m, $1m, $1m that the $2m will scare us off. But we just have to pay the $6.9m over 5 years spread anyway we want.

Nailed it ! The only thing where it gets tricky is trying forcast your entire list payments every year for the term of the contract your loading up . Example : 5years is a long time players come and go and on different amounts.
Its messy .

 

[jakefooty23]

Nick is not a mid.

Whatever you reckon. Why do you only want to compare midfields? Why not Forward lines? Because there's shits all over ours?

 

[clivenator26]

I know that's why I don't get why he thinks we wouldn't match, was a bizarre thing to say

There's a lot of misinformation out there. I also saw someone suggest walking him to the pre season draft which is illogical and would never happen.

 

[peppy la pew]

Nope. The club is in a good position - provided he truly doesn't want to leave.

I firmly believe if he hasn't signed by end of month then he is gone, there is speculation now, he said he'd sign if things became distracting.

I am now 5% worried, I was 0.000001% worried on Monday morning.

If he really wants to leave then we shouldn't stand in his way, instead on getting the best picks available

 

[STK2020]

Dont forget guys a trade can look like anything you want it to be , could be a 1st rounder/ rounders or player / players from other clubs .
Things get crazy during trade week

 

[salim malik]

Whatever you reckon. Why do you only want to compare midfields? Why not Forward lines? Because there's shits all over ours?

Explain why . There forward half is nothing special.

 

[meima]

Explain why . There forward half is nothing special.

Can't you just admit that you are wrong sometime.

 

[Glen Buterol]

So you want to absolutely bend us over for. Top 2 player in the league then? Yeah sorry mate that won't happen. If he requests a trade to you blokes you can bank on Ameet caving and giving us multiple first rounders.

Fyfe is all about the money. If Freo match the offer, or even get close, he'll stay. If St Kilda's <insert other club> offer is far superior, he'll take it imo. What this also means is if he leaves it's for money Freo cannot pay or refuse to pay therefore do not match & accept the free agency compensation.

The Dangerfield trade is very different. Geelong have a very evenly structured pay scheme & have used that model successfully to keep their stars. Ablett excluded. Dangerfield signed with them for much less than he could have got elsewhere. This made it easy for Adelaide to match & force a trade...which was negotiated between both clubs without even going down the free agency route.

 

[peppy la pew]

Fyfe is all about the money. If Freo match the offer, or even get close, he'll stay. If St Kilda's <insert other club> offer is far superior, he'll take it imo. What this also means is if he leaves it's for money Freo cannot pay or refuse to pay therefore do not match & accept the free agency compensation.

The Dangerfield trade is very different. Geelong have a very evenly structured pay scheme & have used that model successfully to keep their stars. Ablett excluded. Dangerfield signed with them for much less than he could have got elsewhere. This made it easy for Adelaide to match & force a trade...which was negotiated between both clubs without even going down the free agency route.

Know him personally do you

 

[Glen Buterol]

Know him personally do you

Nope. "Imo" means "in my opinion".

 

[salim malik]

Can't you just admit that you are wrong sometime.

Its my opinion. If you don't like the ignore button is that way.

 

[G Mus]

Nailed it ! The only thing where it gets tricky is trying forcast your entire list payments every year for the term of the contract your loading up . Example : 5years is a long time players come and go and on different amounts.
Its messy .

In 5 years Fyfe will be a year or two into veteran concessions, we can back end the contract as half will come out from the cap

 

[StCicatriz]

No thet can't. Firstly an offer has to be two years minimum. Secondly the current club only has to equal the $ value over the course of the contract.

Eg St Kilda fans may think if the offer Fyfe $2m for 1 year and then $1.5m, $1.4m, $1m, $1m that the $2m will scare us off. But we just have to pay the $6.9m over 5 years spread anyway we want.

What if it's a 3 year deal?

 

[Unique Name]

What if it's a 3 year deal?

Why would Fyfe risk a 3yr deal?

 

[Unique Name]

What if it's a 3 year deal?

Also we are already paying him $800-900k. We only need to come up with $300-400k more which the cap increase should allow without much fuss.

We have alot of older players to go at the end of the season. Plenty of money will be available.

 

[youmewe]

In 5 years Fyfe will be a year or two into veteran concessions, we can back end the contract as half will come out from the cap

The Veterans Allowance was abolished at the end of 2016.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-03-08/new-veterans-rule-put-all-clubs-on-a-level-playing-field