Brisbane have awesome list management, have covered McStay who was a solid first 18 player, otherwise lost few and brought in Neale and Dunkley, as well as good luck with f/s. Bristling with skills, that's good player development.
Not too different at Geelong. Coupla huge names in Danger and Jez, otherwise they have a history of improving trades eg Stengle, Tuohy, Stanley. Traded out players generally don't star eg Tim Kelly, Rataguolea which suggests player development and fitness is top notch. The good fitness regime helps keep oldies on the park.
Pies would have the best fitness regime, or is it just Sidey and Pendles making them look good? We find/decelop guys like Ginnivan, Markov and Mihocek that many clubs ov we looked, so talent identification is a strength esp bottom end with potential. We do trades, Houston the biggest but a lot of good players Adams Treloar Schulz, as well as smart steak knives like Crisp and arguably WHE. List management is mostly good if you discount the firesale (Grundy Treloar Philips plus Beams meltdown).
If these three are cheating it's soft cap: fitness, player support and development, and for Collingwood add talent ID. It's easier to find Danger or Dunkley "over there, the AA standing next to the premiership player", harder to spot the potential C or B hiding in the Port Melbourne backline or the Carlton rookie list.
We literally pull players from Geelong local league and equivalent. We don't just trade.





But in all seriousness how they obtained 