Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And our eyes are swayed by team success at the time. Put peak king in the 2007-10 era and we would be talking about him just as highly as Ottens. He had some unbelievably dominant games during his time and effectively carried the whole side. I actually cant think of ottens having equivalent games off the top of my head. People forget ottens got a lot of negative backlash from geelong fans before 2007. In part cos the team wasnt doing well.
there is a reason why in the 2007 gf king gets some of the biggest cheers from geelong fans. Geelong fans back then didnt know the future to come like we do now but they had better memories of the previous 10 years.
only king is an all australian ruckman. Ottens isnt.
In saying all that i cant really split them. Maybe i too have been swayed by the premiership era bias.
People said the same thing in the nineties. The dinosaur ruckman were dead. Barnes and mckernan were the future of ruckman. Yet the ruckman now are bigger then they have ever been and the dinosaurs like gawn, goldstein, nic nat and sandilands have been the dominant rucks of the past 25 years. Why? Cos hit outs and marking actually matter.Ottens and King in today's game would be a dinosaur set up. If you took out Blicavs in this team it would be for a forward/mid type or genuine winger.
Why? Why does longevity matter and not actual ability?Good OP, but I think as great as Cameron and Stengle are, 2 and 1 season respectively are just not enough to push in to the team yet.
I just don't want two of them in the same side. One, with Blicavs doing his second ruck and mids 50/50 role, Hawkins at forward stoppages, works better (especially with the ruckman being able to go a kick behind the play like Stanley at times). He was top 3 in B&F in a flag year where our midfield functioned better than it has in many years.People said the same thing in the nineties. The dinosaur ruckman were dead. Barnes and mckernan were the future of ruckman. Yet the ruckman now are bigger then they have ever been and the dinosaurs like gawn, goldstein, nic nat and sandilands have been the dominant rucks of the past 25 years. Why? Cos hit outs and marking actually matter.
before injuries took hold king was quite mobile anyway and exceptional at picking up balls cleanly off the ground. He averaged nearly the same amount of disposals as blicavs did in his best years.
ps. This is a made up imaginary side over twenty years. Why do you think the side plays in 2022 and not 2003?
Actually you're right. I'm playing the game in 1995 now and this is still my best team.People said the same thing in the nineties. The dinosaur ruckman were dead. Barnes and mckernan were the future of ruckman. Yet the ruckman now are bigger then they have ever been and the dinosaurs like gawn, goldstein, nic nat and sandilands have been the dominant rucks of the past 25 years. Why? Cos hit outs and marking actually matter.
before injuries took hold king was quite mobile anyway and exceptional at picking up balls cleanly off the ground. He averaged nearly the same amount of disposals as blicavs did in his best years.
ps. This is a made up imaginary side over twenty years. Why do you think the side plays in 2022 and not 2003?
Well I guess it comes down to what your criteria is, but if you do it for five solid years that's proof that it wasn't a fluke, that you can adapt to changing game styles and increased opponent scrutiny.Why? Why does longevity matter and not actual ability?
Cameron has done it over 10 years though. he has proven its no fluke.Well I guess it comes down to what your criteria is, but if you do it for five solid years that's proof that it wasn't a fluke, that you can adapt to changing game styles and increased opponent scrutiny.
Right now, these two are deserving based on what they've done and if I were picking a team to play (adjusted so the old players aren't actually that old and scaled for the norms of fitness etc at the time) I would pick them.
FB | Thurlow | Gillies | D.Johnson | |
HB | Clark | M.Brown | Ruggles | |
C | Higgins | Horlin-Smith | Cunico | |
HF | Parsons | Ratugolea | Lang | |
FF | Gregson | Kersten | Cockatoo | |
Fol | Z.Smith | Narkle | S.Selwood | |
INT | Vardy | Smedts | Prismall | McCarthy |
Stewie Crameri absolutely robbed.2007 - 2022 Golden Era D team
FB Thurlow Gillies D.Johnson HB Clark M.Brown Ruggles C Higgins Horlin-Smith Cunico HF Parsons Ratugolea Lang FF Gregson Kersten Cockatoo Fol Z.Smith Narkle S.Selwood INT Vardy Smedts Prismall McCarthy
Unlucky to miss out in no particular order
Simpson, Dawson
Fogarty, Lachie
Hogan, Simon
Mumford, Shane
Simpson, Sam
Cowan, Josh
Black, Aaron
Poor old Josh Walker can't even get space in this forwardline2007 - 2022 Golden Era D team
FB Thurlow Gillies D.Johnson HB Clark M.Brown Ruggles C Higgins Horlin-Smith Cunico HF Parsons Ratugolea Lang FF Gregson Kersten Cockatoo Fol Z.Smith Narkle S.Selwood INT Vardy Smedts Prismall McCarthy
Unlucky to miss out in no particular order
Simpson, Dawson
Fogarty, Lachie
Hogan, Simon
Mumford, Shane
Simpson, Sam
Cowan, Josh
Black, Aaron
Poor old Josh Walker can't even get space in this forwardline
Stewie Crameri absolutely robbed.
Holy s**t I forgot we got him!
I see you Crameri and raise you Sam Blease.Holy s**t I forgot we got him!
Harley a great leader but a few others are above him for abilityOttens surely has to make it.
I'd also have Duncan instead of C. Guthrie and Mackie instead of Harley.
Woah. Give you Mackie over Harley.I’d have a couple ahead of Harley too. Mackie and now possibly Jack Henry and Jed Bews (if you want to include a genuine small back).
Woah. Give you Mackie over Harley.
Love Henry and especially Bews but not over Harley.
Harley gets lost a bit on the recency bias IMO - not saying you've applied that here but in general.Harley was a good player but no star. Henry is now a premiership player and should be talked about in the same conversation as Harley. I'd take Henry. Bews was mentioned only because we haven't had an elite small defender over the period discussed to include.
Harley gets lost a bit on the recency bias IMO - not saying you've applied that here but in general.
Harley's leadership was immense in 06-09 and IMo we dont win those falgs with him guiding the playing the group like did.
For that .. I add points to is relevance in these things.
GO Catters