- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Posts
- 11,892
- Reaction score
- 33,117
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- St Kilda, Ocean Grove Collendina Cobras
I could not believe that Hird thought his legal cover would include him taking action. He said the action was reasonable and he had advice from senior and junior counsel to that effect. The EFC ad the same advice. Pity the Federal Court and the Full Federal Court held a different opinion, with Hird's counsel saying he still had strong grounds of appeal to the High Court.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...fusing-to-pay-legal-bill-20150802-giq220.html
Reported in the AGE
'Chubb had denied liability, in a letter dated April 12, 2015, to indemnify Hird for his trial and appeal costs on the grounds that the policy did not cover Hird for pursuing legal proceedings as a claimant; and his legal costs were not reasonably incurred.'
I could not have stated it better myself. Hird remains a fool, but is now a poor fool.
So James is rationale is if I bring a legal action and if I fail I sue my employers insurance company for my costs. Clearly its all about James
I suspect he's trying to get sacked so he gets paid out for next year - the true team man is James







