Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Source?
sen at 6pm news,and so he should have there was nothing in itapparently it's true
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't see the problem its not like what he did was that bad, all those idiots on the main board are just agreeing with what they have heard prior to this incident, that the AFL helped us win the premiership in '05 and thus automatically think that the AFL intervened in this situation.
It's quite amusing to listen to. It's like there is a list of standard phrases that the trolls just copy and paste from somewhere.
"Of course he got off. Its Sydney" etc etc
I don't see the problem its not like what he did was that bad, all those idiots on the main board are just agreeing with what they have heard prior to this incident, that the AFL helped us win the premiership in '05 and thus automatically think that the AFL intervened in this situation.
yes, you're right, and all the stuff on the main board is ludicrous BUT is mostly a reaction because goodes was extremely lucky to get off last year
extremely
a lot of people (including myself) thought he'd cop it this time as a form of payback
fortunately, sanity and sense prevailed, but it's understandable the non-swans are fuming
i forgot the sniper is still rubbed out,we know which boy from colac is the premiership player,must of hurt baker to see monty get a flag.the most amusing are the squealing saints fans, specially the ones wailing "oh, if it had been steven baker, he'd have got six weeks"
well, that's because comparing goodes, a quality footballer, with that roundly recognised cheap-shot merchant and niggling little thug baker is like comparing apples and dog's eggs
Annoying little shits, aren't they?If Goodes didn't get off, there would be a very weak precedent set.
It served the guy who was tackling him (forget who it was) right for continuing the tackle and falling down. Goodes was just pushing him away. Besides, I don't mind seeing taggers get a few little cheap shots back there way.

yes, you're right, and all the stuff on the main board is ludicrous BUT is mostly a reaction because goodes was extremely lucky to get off last year
extremely
a lot of people (including myself) thought he'd cop it this time as a form of payback
fortunately, sanity and sense prevailed, but it's understandable the non-swans are fuming
agree here. This game becoming like bunch of fairies. We all want to see fair play but a bit of argy bargy is fine as well.If Goodes didn't get off, there would be a very weak precedent set.


I say we start seeing how far Goodes can go. Seen as we've gone through most of the weapons of the arm, I wanna see him kick or headbutt someone.![]()

yes, you're right, and all the stuff on the main board is ludicrous BUT is mostly a reaction because goodes was extremely lucky to get off last year
extremely
a lot of people (including myself) thought he'd cop it this time as a form of payback
fortunately, sanity and sense prevailed, but it's understandable the non-swans are fuming