Remove this Banner Ad

Goodes let off

  • Thread starter Thread starter bzparkes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

DeadlyAkkuret said:
Anyone with a football memory, ahh yes compelling evidence right there. I watched that game, it was a final so i didn't miss a minute of it, and i never saw Micky do that. Funny how it's mostly WC fans that are backing that story up.
Click to expand...

Sigh, if you had bothered to re read....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JzVyANa88g

As i said, who cares, ancient history. If you bother to go back through the thread, you'll see i agree with goodes just getting a reprimand. Incident was worth a week, and with his record he deserved leniency.

I was just commenting on the Hunter bumping incident you got on your high horse about, and the incident that brought it about...ie the eye gouge.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

RustyG said:
What a joke.
What excuses did they use to get him off?
Because it was definately intentional,behind play and medium impact.
Christ,the guy wasn't even looking at Goodes when he snipered him.
GUTLESS GOODES.
Click to expand...
This is the Swans we are talking about. Swans players don't get suspended for striking. Remember Barry Hall ?:(
 
sydney eagle said:
This is the Swans we are talking about. Swans players don't get suspended for striking. Remember Barry Hall ?:(
Click to expand...

Eagles players don't get suspended for elbowing players in the head. Remember Gaspar? :(
Eagles players don't get suspended for punching someone in the nuts? Remember Kerr? :(:(
 
swanniez1983 said:
Eagles players don't get suspended for elbowing players in the head. Remember Gaspar? :(
Eagles players don't get suspended for punching someone in the nuts? Remember Kerr? :(:(
Click to expand...

Gaspar, geez that'd be a loss.

He wouldnt elbow anyone anyway, he'd probably break his own arm doing it;)
 
bzparkes said:
I was pretty sure Kerr did get suspended :confused:
Click to expand...

I stand corrected :o

Nevertheless, Kerr only getting one week for that incident (after succeeding with his appeal) was a greater disgrace than Goodes getting away with what he did. NOTE: I was disgusted with what Goodes did and he better thank his lucky stars and start playing some decent footy :thumbsu:
 
swanniez1983 said:
I stand corrected :o

Nevertheless, Kerr only getting one week for that incident (after succeeding with his appeal) was a greater disgrace than Goodes getting away with what he did. NOTE: I was disgusted with what Goodes did and he better thank his lucky stars and start playing some decent footy :thumbsu:
Click to expand...


But Kerr was only trying to punch him in the thigh... :rolleyes:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

bzparkes said:
I was pretty sure Kerr did get suspended :confused:
Click to expand...

What a stupid, stupid thread. You act like a 12 year old girl.

The funny thing is you gutless wonder, you forgot to has mention the king of the cheapshot. Not only does he do it week in week out, he has only been reported once for it (After the 2006 Qualifying Final), after, no less, charging Swans player Nick Malcheski.

Yes I refer to Daniel Chick.

How many weeks did he get for charging. Also can you please tell me how many weeks he got for charging Chris Grant from behind NOT in play? Can you please remind me? I believe he was let off both those times? But please correct me if I am wrong.

It appears that the AFL Tribunal has been consistent afterall. But again please inform me of the times Chick has assaulted a player from behind or charged a player off the ball and not been suspended?

Thread Over. Bye loser.
 
NitWit said:
What a stupid, stupid thread. You act like a 12 year old girl.

The funny thing is you gutless wonder, you forgot to has mention the king of the cheapshot. Not only does he do it week in week out, he has only been reported once for it (After the 2006 Qualifying Final), after, no less, charging Swans player Nick Malcheski.

Yes I refer to Daniel Chick.

How many weeks did he get for charging. Also can you please tell me how many weeks he got for charging Chris Grant from behind NOT in play? Can you please remind me? I believe he was let off both those times? But please correct me if I am wrong.

It appears that the AFL Tribunal has been consistent afterall. But again please inform me of the times Chick has assaulted a player from behind or charged a player off the ball and not been suspended?

Thread Over. Bye loser.
Click to expand...


Nice, sour grapes maybe? I bet you enjoyed the way GAblett put Mainwaring out of the '92 GF within the first couple of minutes.

Pathetic thread? Yours is a pathetic response :rolleyes:
 
bzparkes said:
Nice, sour grapes maybe? I bet you enjoyed the way GAblett put Mainwaring out of the '92 GF within the first couple of minutes.

Pathetic thread? Yours is a pathetic response :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Sour Grapes? No, just a stupid thread posted by someone who wears blue and gold colored glasses. You have criticised the integrity of the AFL Tribunal, I have proven you wrong.

So can you please explain it too me, or will you ask a mod to delete this thread because once again I have proven you wrong:confused:

As for your reply, wrong son, wrong. Now try again.

Answer the question, seeing as we are talking about the integrity of the Tribunal, and seeing as one Mr A. Goodes was let off for charging, another player who is constantly let off and reported on just the one occasion by the name of one Mr D. Chick, for charging at players behind play. I will give two examples.

The two incidents in question are:

1] Daniel Chick charging Nick Malcheski behind play, 2006 Qualifying Final (0 Weeks)

2] Daniel Chick charging Chris Grant, from behind. Round 13, 2005 Vs. Western Bulldogs. (No report)

So before we continue with the Goodes bashing, care to explain why Chick was let off in these two incidents?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

NitWit said:
Sour Grapes? No, just a stupid thread posted by someone who wears blue and gold colored glasses. You have criticised the integrity of the AFL Tribunal, I have proven you wrong.

So can you please explain it too me, or will you ask a mod to delete this thread because once again I have proven you wrong:confused:

As for your reply, wrong son, wrong. Now try again.

Answer the question, seeing as we are talking about the integrity of the Tribunal, and seeing as one Mr A. Goodes was let off for charging, another player who is constantly let off and reported on just the one occasion by the name of one Mr D. Chick, for charging at players behind play. I will give two examples.

The two incidents in question are:

1] Daniel Chick charging Nick Malcheski behind play, 2006 Qualifying Final (0 Weeks)

2] Daniel Chick charging Chris Grant, from behind. Round 13, 2005 Vs. Western Bulldogs. (No report)

So before we continue with the Goodes bashing, care to explain why Chick was let off in these two incidents?
Click to expand...


Proven me wrong how? When was anyone in this thread talking about Daniel Chick??? You want to go on bashing Chick then fine, start your own ****ing thread, don't ambush this one and go off topic.

Do I work for the MRP or the tribunal? HOW THE **** DO I KNOW WHY HE WASN'T REPORTED OR LET OFF YOU IDIOT?

Care to explain why Hall got let-off in the '05 preliminary? Go start your own thread, this is about Goodes, not Chick.
 
bzparkes said:
Proven me wrong how? When was anyone in this thread talking about Daniel Chick??? You want to go on bashing Chick then fine, start your own ****ing thread, don't ambush this one and go off topic.

Do I work for the MRP or the tribunal? HOW THE **** DO I KNOW WHY HE WASN'T REPORTED OR LET OFF YOU IDIOT?

Care to explain why Hall got let-off in the '05 preliminary? Go start your own thread, this is about Goodes, not Chick.
Click to expand...

This is about Goodes. You called the AFL Tribunal inconsistent and weak. I presented an example in the case of Daniel Chicks various charging offenses, which were simular to Goodes' case, where Chick was let off, and in one instace was not reported at all.

Now, after taking off your blue and yellow colored glasses, tell me, if Daniel Chick was not suspended for charging, then should one A. Goodes have been, keeping in mind Chick's charging offenses where he was not suspended or reported?

I have proven you wrong in that respect, The AFL tribunal is consistent.

I am an idiot? Anyone reading this thread with a a dose of common sense would realise the only person in this thread acting like an idiot is you.

I have proven you wrong because of double standards. You accuse the AFL Tribunal of being unfair and inconsistent. I provide a simular case where Chick was let off. You lose I win:thumbsu:

P.S. How did I go off topic when I have provided the Daniel Chick incidents where he was not suspened, which a remarkably simular to the A.Goodes incident.
 
NitWit said:
The AFL tribunal is consistent.
Click to expand...
Quoted for laughs. :D

It's obvious you have an ingrained hate for the Eagles NitWit, so I don't see why anyone would bother arguing with you about this. bzparks is a much better poster that you could ever hope to be. You just dragged this thread off topic simply to have a go at bz and the eagles, which while i'm sure is a favourite pasttime of yours is irrelevent to the thread. You lose at life.
 
Quinzate1 said:
Quoted for laughs. :D

It's obvious you have an ingrained hate for the Eagles NitWit, so I don't see why anyone would bother arguing with you about this. bzparks is a much better poster that you could ever hope to be. You just dragged this thread off topic simply to have a go at bz and the eagles, which while i'm sure is a favourite pasttime of yours is irrelevent to the thread. You lose at life.
Click to expand...

There's a truly rich vein of irony in this....
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

PowerfulPies2023
Let Down seasons
Replies
2
Views
180
PowerfulPies2023
PowerfulPies2023
PrancingPony
    • Like
Is it time to let traditional media in footy die?
2
Replies
26
Views
639
Rotayjay
Rotayjay
windyhill
Dees off to Waverley ?
Replies
13
Views
504
Pistol Night
Pistol Night
L
    • Haha
Players Getting Days Off During the Week
Replies
11
Views
446
RonnieRaven
RonnieRaven
Wosh
    • Like
Admin Announcement Badges Turned Off
Replies
3
Views
243
Bluelegs
Bluelegs
Aristotle Pickett the3rd
    • Haha
    • Love
    • Wow
Autopsy Never write off the Richmond Football Club.
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
Tiger_Of_Old
Tiger_Of_Old
RUNVS
    • Like
Rivals unite - Ultimate off season thread idea
2 3
Replies
66
Views
3K
BarbieITFC
BarbieITFC

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom