Remove this Banner Ad

Hampson + Bentick for Warnock

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Won't happen, Hampson has signed a 3 yr deal with us - no way will we let him go. To me, Hammer seems to have some untapped potential that will benefit us in the long run.

How about Carrazzo + Bentick + 2nd rounder?

I cannot see us having 3 quality young ruckman on our list and Freo having just 1. I reckon they would want a ruckman with potential.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Interested to know peoples thoughts
My thoughts were that they signed Hampson recently for 2 years to give him a chance to develop with the view that when that contract expires they will be in a position to perhaps deal with the Gold Coast which i believe is where he grew up, but someone had mentioned that his family may have moved to Victoria, not that would matter if he was keen to rejoin his mates etc.

I believe we need to add to our young talent and in particular our ruck stocks and not trade them away.
 
Looks like the people have spoken and Hampson stays.

Must say I like the kid but I reckon Warnock looks an absolute star him and Special K to me could end up two superstars of the AFL
 
My thoughts were that they signed Hampson recently for 2 years to give him a chance to develop with the view that when that contract expires they will be in a position to perhaps deal with the Gold Coast which i believe is where he grew up, but someone had mentioned that his family may have moved to Victoria, not that would matter if he was keen to rejoin his mates etc.

I believe we need to add to our young talent and in particular our ruck stocks and not trade them away.

He was signed for three years, to ensure that he couldn't be poached by the GC.

Either way, he's got a lot of potential, and while he is still extremely raw, could be a very good ruckman for us going forward. Don't see the point trading one ruckman for another, despite the fact that Warnock is AFL-ready or there abouts.

Anyway, won't happen as Hampson signed up this year, and after he and his family already moved from Queensland down to Vic, can't see him being open to the idea of ending up in WA.
 
I cannot see us having 3 quality young ruckman on our list and Freo having just 1. I reckon they would want a ruckman with potential.


Freo will get Nic Naitanui with their 3rd pick. When Freo have an animal in the likes of Sandilands and even K. Bradley to help in the ruck, they can afford to trade Warnock for some much needed mid-field talent.

Freo lose their games in the middle, because Sandilands gets the tap but hardley to advantage, so by having Bentick in the middle for them as an in and under, it's a win win.

Krooz could be a quality KPP @ CHF once he developes, but as a 3rd ruck option. Hammer with his great leap and Warnock with his height, I can see us becoming a possible top 4 contender next year!
 
He was signed for three years, to ensure that he couldn't be poached by the GC.

Either way, he's got a lot of potential, and while he is still extremely raw, could be a very good ruckman for us going forward. Don't see the point trading one ruckman for another, despite the fact that Warnock is AFL-ready or there abouts.

Anyway, won't happen as Hampson signed up this year, and after he and his family already moved from Queensland down to Vic, can't see him being open to the idea of ending up in WA.
Sorry did mean 3 years, i must of hit the wrong button! Fisher was signed for 2 years.
 
Interesting question. Having watched Hammer a few times,I have the feeling the experiment will either kick on a become an amazing success story, or it could fail miserably. 50/50 at this stage IMO.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Won't happen, Hampson has signed a 3 yr deal with us - no way will we let him go. To me, Hammer seems to have some untapped potential that will benefit us in the long run.

How about Carrazzo + Bentick + 2nd rounder?

How about no?

Exactly which part of ‘lack’ and ‘depth’ do you blokes not understand?

We can’t afford any more of these ‘two for’ and ‘three for’ trades. If anything we should be doing the opposite for draft picks.

If we are to acquire Warnock it would have to be in a calculated fashion that would help us out beyond the mere acquisition of a ruckmen. Perhaps the trading of picks and/or players so that we can still benefit from the draft despite not having the same picks as we started with.

I don’t want us to be picking up B-Grade triers in the lower reaches of the draft that will make Heath Scotland look like Chris Judd.
 
let me have one minute to think about it!!

thinking thinking!!

HELL NO!!
Hampo can not and will not leave the blues, he will turn out to be an absolute GUN!!!



hey guys, im just curious, has murphy and waite signed?
because i heard on the radio that they havent, and was just wondering!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Interesting question. Having watched Hammer a few times,I have the feeling the experiment will either kick on a become an amazing success story, or it could fail miserably. 50/50 at this stage IMO.


Interesting, i got a feeling your prediction will either be right or wrong, 50/50 at this stage :D
 
I cannot see us having 3 quality young ruckman on our list and Freo having just 1. I reckon they would want a ruckman with potential.

We need to address the issue of our rucks obviously, but sending Hampson to Freo for Warnock is not a good way forward.

The argument of having 3 quality rucks is a non issue as we currently dont have 2 quality rucks.

Even if both Hampson and Krueze exceed our expectations next year they are physically not ready to crash and bash all day, and we dont want them to.
 
I want to know what all this fuss is about Warnock. Yes he is tall, but every time I've seen him play he looks uncoordinated and pretty crap. I don't understand why there is so much interest in him
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom