Remove this Banner Ad

Henri Leconte's Commentating

  • Thread starter Thread starter EBUS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He comes up with some funny stuff, but he needs to be kept on a leash. Fair enough the doubles isn't that interesting, but it's not the Henri Show. Talking over the points about stuff completely unrelated to the match is hugely irritating.

I think he'd be okay with a commentary partner who kept him under control and provided substantive analysis, rather than just egging him on. He won a French Open doubles title; he could add a lot of insight to this match if he wanted to.
 
matty lloyd the champ said:
It's doubles, it's pretty hard to get excited over that
Click to expand...
Rubbish, IMO doubles provides some of the most exciting matches of the tournament.

There's more to tennis than long baseline rallies. Well constructed doubles strategy, with pinpoint passing shots and crisp volleys, is excellent to watch.
 
Caesar said:
Rubbish, IMO doubles provides some of the most exciting matches of the tournament.

There's more to tennis than long baseline rallies. Well constructed doubles strategy, with pinpoint passing shots and crisp volleys, is excellent to watch.
Click to expand...
How is it fun? Points end way too quickly for my liking and everything is played and won at the net. There is a reason why the arena is usually only half full during a doubles match.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

matty lloyd the champ said:
How is it fun? Points end way too quickly for my liking and everything is played and won at the net. There is a reason why the arena is usually only half full during a doubles match.
Click to expand...
It's a different kind of game. Reflexes are paramount, playing the angles far more important. Less unforced errors because it's the quick and the dead. Points aren't only won at the net - in fact, the teams that win titles are usually the ones with the best passing shots. Tactics don't emerge over the point, it's about set plays and variations, and how well the team communicates.

It's less glamorous, sure. You don't get the big, expansive plays that end up on the highlight reels. But it's an extremely tactical game with a lot of high quality play amongst the specialists. I love the slams because it's the one chance you get to see really high quality doubles.
 
This guy now? Puffing into the mike and whistling?

I have almost no interest in tennis but I'm come to comment just because of him.

I think he's had a few cones.
 
Leo Barry You Star said:
They just confirmed he's doing the Tsonga match! :eek:
Click to expand...

Horrible choice, he'll be completely biased towards Tsonga, hopefully Courier can keep him on a leash.

But I guess anything is a better option than JA.
 
matt_897 said:
Horrible choice, he'll be completely biased towards Tsonga, hopefully Courier can keep him on a leash.

But I guess anything is a better option than JA.
Click to expand...

Hopefully he is used in small doses and i reckon he will probably do the after match interview which would be classic.

Cant wait for him to come on tomorrow though
 
premiers06 said:
Hopefully he is used in small doses and i reckon he will probably do the after match interview which would be classic.

Cant wait for him to come on tomorrow though
Click to expand...

The post match interview? No chance, Courier is the king of interviews.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Absolutely ruined a ripper game of tennis tonight, snoring in the deciding tiebreaker, I mean come on. I dearly hope he isn't even considered to do the Tsonga/Djokovic game.
 
SouthSwans said:
Absolutely ruined a ripper game of tennis tonight, snoring in the deciding tiebreaker, I mean come on. I dearly hope he isn't even considered to do the Tsonga/Djokovic game.
Click to expand...

To be fair it was a really crap match. Just because a match is close doesnt mean it is quality (Eg- Davydenko v Verdasco). Most of the rallies lasted 2 or 3 shots and nobody was hitting decent returns.
 
Mr Ripper said:
Seven are gunna milk this one dry. :o
Click to expand...

I fear the same, they probably think that having him on (being a great tennis character) will deflect the negative attention on their overall coverage.

I loved him in the Tsonga match as it was great hearing someone be more emotive during the game, rather than Sandy "stating the bleeding obvious" Roberts (ie: reacting to the tennis play, as we would in our lounge rooms wowwwwwwwwww what a shot etc :D :p).

It's going to backfire if Tsonga doesn't play well, he might start snoring into the mic again :p
 
Dr Awkward said:
To be fair it was a really crap match. Just because a match is close doesnt mean it is quality (Eg- Davydenko v Verdasco). Most of the rallies lasted 2 or 3 shots and nobody was hitting decent returns.
Click to expand...
I don't think it's very fair to compare it to Davydenko/Verdasco. The winners v unforced errors ratio in the doubles match was actually pretty good - and you never get long rallies in doubles.
 
Should be great for the Tsonga match, him barracking for him actually makes it funny. I loved last night how he was saying that everyone went home because the match was boring.
He'd be great with Jim Courier.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

While I am this guys number one fan, last night's commentary was a tad bit tedious (just a tad!!)... he needs to put it back a bit for the singles match tonight BUT if it is an epic 4/5 setter, then by all means, let loose for sure.

My two cents anyway. Cant wait for the match tonight. :thumbsu:
 
He was a light-hearted fad during the tsonga-almagro match, but he simply isn't professional enough to commentate a men's singles match at the business end of a grand slam.
 
This guy is great value in small doses, like in the snippets on the channel seven website. During the doubles yesterday he was starting to irritate and if he is given any extended time for the match tonight I think the novelty will wear out completely.
 
7 now featured him on their news. It was like the 4th or 5th story in.

**** they know how to ruin a good thing. They've got inside his head now and it will seem forced.
 
to be honest i find his blatant bias towards Tsonga quite refreshing. I prefer that he is open, as apposed to those Aussie commentators who pretend they are professional yet it is blatant that they are supporting the Aussies. It makes their favoritism more noticable and embarrassing
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom