News Ins & Outs vs Geelong - Fasolo and Keeffe return

[mike123]

Sidebottom for mine.

I don't mind that either.

 

[Maggie5]

Fasolo should be sub IMO. Surprised he was selected from what I have seen in the VFL.

 

[Pie eyed]

we need a little bit of cockiness!

Good thing you added a suffix to that last word....

 

[blaze036]

Good thing you added a suffix to that last word....

 

[Ulahoopski]

Reid+Seedsmen+Brown+Sinclair+Williams, plus depth options Oxley/Scharenberg (and if ur being generous throw in gault/broomhead too) so yeah 6-7.

Maybe you should invent your own forum where people can only have positive opinion's on everything, I'm sure it would be VERY popular and VERY interesting... "Every player is great ! Hey I agree, yeah I also agree! Agreed then" What a utopia

Saying I never say anything positive is cringe-worthingly ignorant, my posting history is there for all to see, go have a look .

The only player in today's team who is keeping Armstrong out is Langdon. His size and potential role isn't going to challenge Maxy, Toovs, Keefe, Frosty, or Lumumba so it's irrelevant who else is missing, particularly if you're counting 4 guys who have played 2 games between them! So calling Armstrong a spud because he's not displacing Langdon is akin to calling Langdon a spud. It's supporters like you who hung it on Toovey in his first couple of seasons and more recently, Sinclair. You're better off backing the club we love to know what they're doing in recruiting players and identifying talent in them.
Just because you claim to support Collingwood doesn't mean everything is black and white either. It's not either ALL positive or ALL negative. It's called balance and once again, as a "supporter" in a Collingwood forum you should be more positive than negative. I already looked through (first two pages) of your posting history - hence the comment - nothing positive whatsoever, just lots of drunk posts. Maybe you're cringing from their effects?

 

[mike123]

Certainly would be, front of 80,000 at the G, cameras everywhere ...

Didn't stop Yagmoor's debut

 

[Ulahoopski]

Blaze may tend toward the 'glass half empty' philosophy or the 'prove it' attitude but I would never doubt his love of the club.

There's a difference between love and support. Your wife might love you but if she's always criticising you then she's not a great support, just bitchy. Meep meep

 

[SuperSub17]

When is that From?

The Sydney game early last year I think

 

[jonbe54]

There's a difference between love and support. Your wife might love you but if she's always criticising you then she's not a great support, just bitchy. Meep meep

Sounds like that come from the Acme box of trueisms.

 

[jimmy35]

Surely the two outs are better players currently than the two ins. Fasolo has hardly been dominating at VFL and Keeffe has been sadly out of form, while both Brown and Sinclair were very good players last week. If anything, the side looks weaker rather than stronger, to me anyway.

I like Sinkers but Fas should give us some class coming out of the back half, we sadly sadly lack in that department. Brownies a loss but hopefully Keeffe can come on a bit more, he's pretty important if they want Reid to play up forward.

 

[TradeDraft]

Blair to be the Sub

 

[Timmy from Thomastown]

Blair to be the Sub

Cant argue with that.

 

[forwardflanker]

The only player in today's team who is keeping Armstrong out is Langdon. His size and potential role isn't going to challenge Maxy, Toovs, Keefe, Frosty, or Lumumba so it's irrelevant who else is missing, particularly if you're counting 4 guys who have played 2 games between them! So calling Armstrong a spud because he's not displacing Langdon is akin to calling Langdon a spud. It's supporters like you who hung it on Toovey in his first couple of seasons and more recently, Sinclair. You're better off backing the club we love to know what they're doing in recruiting players and identifying talent in them.
Just because you claim to support Collingwood doesn't mean everything is black and white either. It's not either ALL positive or ALL negative. It's called balance and once again, as a "supporter" in a Collingwood forum you should be more positive than negative. I already looked through (first two pages) of your posting history - hence the comment - nothing positive whatsoever, just lots of drunk posts. Maybe you're cringing from their effects?

Complaining that someone is overly negative doesn't really address the point that Armstrong at this stage is one of the last picked on the list.

 

[Timmy from Thomastown]

Complaining that someone is overly negative doesn't really address the point that Armstrong at this stage is one of the last picked on the list.

I think we all agree Armstrong is one of the last picked on the list. But that doesnt mean he cant produce something down the track. Its the easiest game in the world for the glass half empty type to point to the apparent weakest link in the team and call out that the sky is falling.

 

[ClaytonM]

Cant argue with that.

I can. I doubt he will be the sub. His commitment to the contest is something we need and something I think the selection committee love in him. Could be Blair but it would surprise me.

 

[Pie eyed]

Lol.
Just kiddin...had to be said.

 

[Pie eyed]

I like Sinkers but Fas should give us some class coming out of the back half, we sadly sadly lack in that department. Brownies a loss but hopefully Keeffe can come on a bit more, he's pretty important if they want Reid to play up forward.

Fas struggled tonight and mode some mighty **** ups.
I don't begrudge him that though.
Out of touch.

 

[jimmy35]

Fas struggled tonight and mode some mighty **** ups.
I don't begrudge him that though.
Out of touch.

I thought he was okay, couple of **** ups but generally hits the target with the ball. That's something new for us.

 

[half_back_flank]

He did alright for a bloke who would have played hardly any football in the back half.

He's good enough to learn the caper in the seniors, lets leave him there for a couple of weeks.