Gone Critical
Moderator
- Moderator
- #151
Sorry to be a questioner so often but this is difficult to trust. First it's a promotional article written by a physio pushing their own practice. They don't give any details or information about the study they quote so it can be identified and checked. The most questionable thing though is the 54% injury rate at 2 weeks and 70% at 1 year in the basic group. They are bizarre numbers. What were they doing with hamstring injuries to allow a 54% reinjury at 2 weeks. Just that number alone would suggest the group didn't know what they were doing. Unless they can come up with some reasonable explanation for those figures their whole study should be in doubt.To put in plain English (in my limited understanding) most hammie recurrences occur when one does too much too soon. Odds of a soft-tissue injury recurrence increase with each episode, and get shorter when a player hits the 30s.
Perhaps the club simply needs to lift its game. In England they've changed the rehab protocol to extend beyond simple stretching and strengthening to good effect:
"...This should focus on agility, trunk stabilization, neuromuscular control and eccentric exercises. The effectiveness of such a programme was demonstrated in a recent study which compared it to a basic hamstring stretch and strengthening programme. Re-injury rates in the comprehensive programme were 0% at 2 week and 7.7% at 1 year, while the stretch and strengthening group were 54% at 2 weeks and 70% at 1 year.."
http://www.thephysiocompany.com/blog/michael-owen-and-the-curse-of-his-recurring-hamstring-injuries
P.S: And hell yeah we keep Elliot on our list and work hard until we get him right, or we are 120% sure he'll never be.





