Joe Daniher

[mxett]

They AFL did not insist they play in the NAB. The AFL forbade them playing in Willy.

because without an IN they were eligible for the NAB, unlike the players with provisional suspensions........

 

[10571z]

This is pure jibberish

While I see it as extremely unlikely maybe just maybe the club wanted to fast track their new power forward?

 

[Armchair Critic]

Because, well, just because we want it so much!!

Reminds me of when you were telling us all Downes was sent in to shut it all down

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Reminds me of when you were telling us all Downes was sent in to shut it all down

you're not making this up are you mate?

 

[BlueWorld]

The AFL wouldn't be forcing Joe to play in Morwell, if he has an infraction notice.

But they didn't force him to play in morwell. Why wasn't he named to play there if he has no in?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

But they didn't force him to play in morwell. Why wasn't he named to play there if he has no in?

hahaha oh wow, you think the only reason he could have for not being selected to play is an infraction?



Keep reaching mate, keep the dream alive

 

[hfchfc]

hahaha oh wow, you think the only reason he could have for not being selected to play is an infraction?



Keep reaching mate, keep the dream alive

Tell us the reason he didn't play then?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Tell us the reason he didn't play then?

because if he was going to play some kind of early season practice match then they wanted him to play with most of his team-mates rather than a second string side for some reason...

 

[hfchfc]

because if he was going to play some kind of early season practice match then they wanted him to play with most of his team-mates rather than a second string side for some reason...

But this second string side is going to be his teammates. Doesn't make sense.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

But this second string side is going to be his teammates. Doesn't make sense.

hahaha speaking of making sense, how are they going to be his teammates if he has an infraction?

****ing lol, any chance of even a slight bit of logical consistency?

 

[snitzel]

Not as nice a backpedal as James "I take full responsibility" Hird!!!

mate.

 

[snitzel]

nearly as many as the number of IN issued to EFC players!!

again mate, on fire.

 

[Magruder]

Respond to what? Forum speculation?

All the media speculation to which you refer in numerous posts.

 

[hfchfc]

hahaha speaking of making sense, how are they going to be his teammates if he has an infraction?

******* lol, any chance of even a slight bit of logical consistency?

Sorry, I took your word that he didn't. Therefore, why wouldn't he want to play with his new teammates? lol - the language of teenage girls!

 

[hfchfc]

again mate, on fire.

Anything worthwhile to add veil?

 

[Thrawn]

hahaha speaking of making sense, how are they going to be his teammates if he has an infraction?

******* lol, any chance of even a slight bit of logical consistency?

Where's the logical consistency in pulling out Daniher due to "general soreness" from the NAB cup, then naming him in the squad to "match simulate" with Williamstown, then pulling him out at the last moment.

Couldn't have anything to do with "protecting" his identity, now could it?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Sorry, I took your word that he didn't.

if you took my word he didn't, why were you questioning reasons why he didn't play in Morwell that weren't him having an infraction?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Where's the logical consistency in pulling out Daniher due to "general soreness" from the NAB cup, then naming him in the squad to "match simulate" with Williamstown, then pulling him out at the last moment.

Couldn't have anything to do with "protecting" his identity, now could it?

can you point me to anything that indicates he was pulled from the match for "general soreness"? Anything at all? Surely you can, surely you're not so delusional you think BigFooty is reality?

 

[snitzel]

Anything worthwhile to add veil?

No I don't have any worthwhile Zingas! to add.

 

[hfchfc]

if you took my word he didn't, why were you questioning reasons why he didn't play in Morwell that weren't him having an infraction?

Um champ, I was asking the reason he didn't play if he didn't have an IN

 

[Thrawn]

can you point me to anything that indicates he was pulled from the match for "general soreness"? Anything at all? Surely you can, surely you're not so delusional you think BigFooty is reality?

He pulled up sore from a training session. This is what has been reported by your own kin. Apparently this is why he was not named vs St Kilda.

Can you give us another legitimate reason why he'd possibly miss?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Um champ, I was asking the reason he didn't play if he didn't have an IN

and I told you

 

[footyfanatic09]

He will play next week

 

[Lance Uppercut]

He pulled up sore from a training session. This is what has been reported by your own kin. Apparently this is why he was not named vs St Kilda.

Can you give us another legitimate reason why he'd possibly miss?

oh right, so you do think BigFooty is reality.

Ok then. Can't do much really then can we. Not when you're asking for "logical consistency" to apply to a fantasy.

Soreness had nothing to do with why he didn't play. That's why Essendon never, ever said it was. Strange that. The coaching staff wanted him to play minimal minutes, and with his actual team mates.

Pretty simple, but I hope that doesn't persuade you because this thread is amazing entertainment and I can't wait to see how you back it up when he eventually does play

 

[hfchfc]

and I told you

Ok, so he would rather partake in "match stimulation" then play a proper practice game with the blokes that will be his teammates this season? Genuinely lacking any form of leadership at the EFC.