Remove this Banner Ad

Podcast Joe Rogan Experience

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I have listened to a sh*t load of his Podcasts and would describe him as genuinely curious, tolerant, compassionate and a sensational conversationalist with a live and let live attitude to life.
He does sound that way.

But he sometimes gets onto the "so open minded your brain falls out" track.
 
Joe leads a very full, busy life, married, 2 kids, a 100 million dollar Spotify deal with one of the most viewed Podcasts on the planet, UFC expert/commentator, comedian, rifle/bow hunter, jiu jitsu black belt, he is in the midst of living a hell of an enjoyable life.

I have listened to a sh*t load of his Podcasts and would describe him as genuinely curious, tolerant, compassionate and a sensational conversationalist with a live and let live attitude to life. He wouldn't be losing too much sleep over the latest shitstorm, if he was to be cancelled he wont be slitting his wrists, he's too busy enjoying his life and would quickly find other things to occupy himself.
Agree. **** Spotify. Bunch of limp wristed bitching virtue signalling victims. **** those soy types. Come back to youtube Joe!!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He does sound that way.

But he sometimes gets onto the "so open minded your brain falls out" track.
He puts out on average 10-12 hours of unedited content a week, he gets on my nerves sometimes too, if that happens I just turn it off and try again with another guest, I don't whinge and call for his head because he's convincing grown adults to kill themselves via misinformation.
 
I don't whinge and call for his head because he's convincing grown adults to kill themselves via misinformation.
Why not? Why allow platforming of anti-vax, ivermectin nutbars? It does nobody any good. All of his lies are available online, why spread them? It's a massive lapse of judgement.
 
Do you know the context of that and how long ago it was, if so are you of the opinion he should be banned from having a platform on the internet?
So you don’t think that ten years ago he should have known not to say it so flippantly on a podcast? I believe the whole cancel culture goes too far sometimes and I don’t think he should be but you can’t seriously tell
me he wouldn’t have known saying that might get him into trouble.
 
Usual course of action is that when you can't beat them in a discussion you try and beat them by having others not listen to them - going after the person for any reason.

As an example.
The big one will be when Martin Luther King Jr's words about content of character over colour of skin become inconvenient and people suddenly "remember" he has a history of orgies and sexual assualt denial.
 
Why not? Why allow platforming of anti-vax, ivermectin nutbars? It does nobody any good. All of his lies are available online, why spread them? It's a massive lapse of judgement.
Was this misinformation? >



Should they be still allowed a voice? People went out because they were told it stopped transmission and infection and some of them probably died.
 
So you don’t think that ten years ago he should have known not to say it so flippantly on a podcast? I believe the whole cancel culture goes too far sometimes and I don’t think he should be but you can’t seriously tell
me he wouldn’t have known saying that might get him into trouble.
I'm willing to forgive Rogan if this is all the attack pack could find after trolling through thousands of hours of footage from a fella who routinely gets stoned and/or drunk on his podcast, I'd back Rogan's character and confidently say he is not a racist over many who want him cancelled.
 
I'm willing to forgive Rogan if this is all the attack pack could find after trolling through thousands of hours of footage from a fella who routinely gets stoned and/or drunk on his podcast, I'd back Rogan's character and confidently say he is not a racist over many who want him cancelled.
I don’t think he’s racist but surely you yourself know not to say the word on social media/radio/tv/in a public forum where it’s going to be recorded and be accessible for others in the future.

It’s not acceptable at any point but if he’s in the confines of his house with mates and no one else is going to hear it, then we wouldn’t be having this discussion. I just think he needed to have awareness, even 30-40 years ago, people did about not using that word.

They also found him being pro-vaccine initially as someone posted earlier but has done an about face since. Could it be he’s grifting off those who are anti-establishment/pro-conspiracy etc?
 
Rogan fans have to realise that he is mainstream media now, and that means he is finally being held to those standards. I think that's all that's happening here.

It's too bad that Joe is a meathead, because most people can appreciate the format of listening to people and hearing them out, which is somewhat rare on TV. Unfortunately Joe still exercises plenty of bias when it comes to selecting guests and topics to speak about, as well as his views on issues like vaccines, trans people. This is particularly a problem as many of his fans still think he is 'open-minded'.

His commentary is repetitive and uninformed and opinionated in the absence of actual experts, and you have to be more responsible than that when lives are at stake, and also just when misinformation is such a problem in our society. Sometimes he'll have an expert on like Dr Deborah Soh, but she comes with her political baggage, so again he is misleading his audience about the validity of the discourse on his show.

A good new rule for him would be not to have his usual strong uninformed opinions without an unbiased,non political expert present. So if you want to talk about vaccines or Ivermectin, get Dr Osterholm on again, or get Dr John Campbell on. I've been following him for COVID news.

There's plenty of actual unbiased shows out there.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

without an unbiased,non political expert present.
or get Dr John Campbell on

My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally.

Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider.



Not exactly an expert on virology. Seems a classic case of attaching more credibility to someone than they deserve because you like what they are saying.
 
It's more that he is informed and doesn't have an agenda other than informing others. His qualifications are just a bonus.
Unfortunately he's been doing a bit of his own bio-waste spreading.
 
Should never use the N word obviously, very few do...
EXCEPT black people! In music, in general culture, they use it all the time.
You have to stop first, or itll never happen.
But they just do not get that.
Change starts with you.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why not? Why allow platforming of anti-vax, ivermectin nutbars? It does nobody any good. All of his lies are available online, why spread them? It's a massive lapse of judgement.
So censoring speech you don't agree with is the way to go is it?

Or is it not better to allow that speech and have it countered?

Free speech is rapidly being eradicated

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
 
So censoring speech you don't agree with is the way to go is it?

Or is it not better to allow that speech and have it countered?

Free speech is rapidly being eradicated

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
Free speech is ok so long as the mob like what you're saying. If they don't like it then you must be canceled asap
 
Oh rubbish.

1) He can post it on a blog or email it to a subscriber list. Whatever. It's not censorship. If Rogan refused to have me on his show would that be censorship? You? David Duke?

2) "Speech you disagree with" would mean it's something debatable. Malone tells lies. Rogan let him do that without resistance. The results of those lies being broadcast are not trivial.

3) It would be of debatable value if Rogan had the skills and knowledge to refute Malone's lies on the spot. He doesn't.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom