- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,879
- 56,878
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #26
Of interest:
Marilyn Manson - Depp's bestie.
Marilyn Manson - Depp's bestie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You pushed an adviser on me I wasn't going to watch and explained it. You think it's an excellent analysis but to me if it starts from that view point it simply can't be. Because it's imbued with bias. I don't want to listen to anyone who is biased because it's rubbish
I'm not frustrated. I watched it all I resolved what I thought was appropriate abd agreed 100% with the 7 jurors with whom Tragos agreed
Look it's 30 mins. I'll look. But I'll tell you now if I've decided something on evaluation of facts no one's biased view will sway me. sorry
Body Language Panel? Do you mean The Behaviour Panel? If so yeah I like their stuff too, did they also mention that MANY actors are narcissists? It is an occupation that attracts them because it brings to them the attention and importance they seek.The body language panel who I also follow are unanimous about her pathological lies. They draw attention to the fact that when you shift from emotion you can't do it instantaneously because the emotion must morph. Hers changed emotion and expressions in seconds. They concluded it was all fake and further that she's a narcissist.
She hasn't demonstrated bias.
She hasn't demonstrated bias.
With respect if she's telling all those people talking about fake bruises or photos to get ******* then it is bias. Sorry
You think she faked them? Did you notice that there were witnesses to the bruises at different times, both before and after concealment makeup went over them?
Let's speak again when you've looked at Depp's complete history and the documentary 'Framing Amber Heard' comes out.
Thought I would google the topic "Framing Amber Heard" just to see what was available relating to it
Instead what came up was audio tape circa 2015 where she talks about framing Depp and how she would do it.
I think I might wait for the documentary and the ensuing defamation case that follows.
When I mentioned a doccy 'Framing Amber Heard' it was in anticipation of what's to come.
In the meantime, I'll wait for the appeal while keeping an eye on how this case against Depp pans out. Marilyn Manson's lawsuit against Evan Wood should also be interesting. Manson's social media campaign against her has already begun.
Don't know MM or EW. I lose interest if I don't know of people
Marilyn Manson, while not as wealthy and adored as Depp, has been a close friend of Depp's for a long time. Manson's the godfather of Lily Rose Depp.
You really don't know who he is?
Brian Hugh Warner (born January 5, 1969), known professionally as Marilyn Manson, is an American singer, songwriter, actor, painter, and writer.
AH team makes a submission to have the case and verdict thrown out. There are a couple of issues. A juror in the case supposedly had a birth date of 1945 but instead it was 1970. This is important IF and only IF the juror is found not to be from the jury pool at all even if is a case of mistaken identity. For this to result in case being thrown the juror would have to be outside the district. Investigation will take place to resolve. I accept Peter Tragos opinion and knowledge on this point for procedural fairness
The other issue was that there was pre trial agreement that for the UK hearing transcript to be excluded as evidence that the damages claim would be limited to post UK damages. Peter suggests there may be some merit in this BUT both sides argued the point on issues spanning from 2014. With respect to Peter I personally think he is getting confused between the defamatory statement (which spans all abuse with AH as potential victim) and from as early as 2O14 and the damages resulting from the defamatory statements which is an analysis of post op ed financial effects to JD excluding any lingering damage from UK outcome. I haven't checked the content of that financial damages expert witness testimony (which I will do) but my recollection was that indeed it was limited in calculation to the post op ed period only. Indeed in that analysis there was even discussion and testimony to show the UK was excluded from damages. I therefore depart somewhat from PT thinking on this though conclusion is the same......that the submission will fail as will the appeal that follows
Depp was dysfunctional.
Although I would not classify a bottle as a sex toy.
Can Sex Toys help with Erectile Dysfunction?
The majority of sex toys are not designed with erectile dysfunction (ED) in mind. However as with other conditions there are design and functional elements of some sex toys that can be useful for different ways of experiencing pleasure. Some products offer pleasure through vibration, while...www.blissforwomen.com