Miguel Sanchez
Snide Shooter
Rioli third number.
Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #[emoji637]
They do now, ever since Tredrea gave up the captaincy and booted Danyle Pearce out of the #16.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Rioli third number.
Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #[emoji637]
1 and 4 will be available next year3 should be saved for Chad or Fred “Freddy the Jet” Rodriguez, if either lands at the club. Not a fan of Baker & Graham getting numbers like 3 & 17. Some will say it’s just a number & not that deep, but that’s absolute trash & you all know it.
16: Baker
17: Shanahan
23: Maric
26: Gross
27 J.Williams
31: Edwards
34: Graham
35: Grego
37: Sellwood or Denver Grainger-Barrass
38: Champion
41: Davis
42: Owies
I have a feeling that the number 3 would have been among Bakers list of trade demands though.

The jumper numbers are a nice link to the past but this isn’t the NBA and nobody in a league full of token gestures is ‘retiring’ numbers, outside of perhaps an untimely death, even then it’s unlikely to be ‘forever’.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Making the captain wear number 1 sounds like something an U14s team would do.Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #[emoji637]
They do now, ever since Tredrea gave up the captaincy and booted Danyle Pearce out of the #16.
Given they've got 0-99 (and 00 as well I'm pretty sure) to use, where as AFL only allows the use of 1-50, I don't see it happening.I'd rather we don't go down the route of the NBA where literally a dozen numbers or more cannot be used.
On that note, John McCarthy's #35 has just been unretired, with the blessing of his family.
I'd rather we don't go down the route of the NBA where literally a dozen numbers or more cannot be used.
I wouldn't mind if just one or two numbers were retired. Had the club retired Mainy's #3 in 2007 that would've been a nice gesture but not retiring it wasn't disrespectful or anything.
They actually did retire it for three years.
Firmly agreeRetiring numbers (even temporarily) is stupid.
But I feel this is an unpopular take (unlike me, I know).