Remove this Banner Ad

Kerr

  • Thread starter Thread starter Woodstock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

That's fine.

All I've taken umbrage with is the suggestion that, should Kerr be traded this year, he wouldn't fetch a first rounder.

I think that's a ridiculous claim to make.

It would definatley involve our first rounder, thats a given.

But we'd need more. We'd need to fetch a reasonable pick for Schulz or maybe trade you Matt White as well.

So I still think Alex Rance may come into the equation somewhere. :thumbsu:
 
That's what I thought.

But I've been set straight by one of your bright sparks.

I see you have found solace there gunnar dude.
Lets see if what you thought, is set straight by what unfolds.
Like i said, what everyone thinks here means diddly squat, when the e-girls are in a definite bind re. Kerr - GC- Uncontracted next year- etc etc , and those doing the bargaining, i.e recruiters and list managers not BF posters, know it.

Lets just say, the initial press release emanating out of the e-girls was, we wont deal with anyone unless it involves 2 first rounders....LMAO.....yeah ok...and you can have coke and fries with that too. ;)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As for your ludicrous suggestion that you expect him to re-sign. Another dreamy expectation about a player who knows what he has to offer, resigning himself to playing in an also-ran side while others who he formed a formidable unit with, are not only playing where it matters, in and amongst finals, they are based in a city where their futures after football are being cemented. Instead of being pissed up against the wall in a two horse town. ;)
So what happened, champ?

Remember my "ludicrous suggestion" that Kerr would re-sign?

Looks like I was right and you, surprise surprise, were wrong.

Fancy that, eh?

You got owned.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom