Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedVest4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Three strikes laws deserve rage of any colour.
Mandatory sentencing is a unjust way of dealing with repeat offenders, no disagreement

But it's caused by electing their judicial officials.
 
In itself a ludicrous law brought in to punish and control poor people. It's a disgusting, barbaric method of sentencing.

Use of that law saw an increase in police injuries and other dangerous behaviour in evading arrest.

Don't even TRY to defend that sh*t.
Not to mention the NT version, which I did an essay on the last time I went to Uni.

It just so happened that all the crimes that were included in three strikes were crimes Aboriginals were more likely to commit.

******* strange coincidence, isn't it?

You are overly desperate to insert race into something that was between evil white people.
 
The sister's boyfriend too, if what I've read is correct.



Sister's boyfriend's house yeah?

Yes sisters boyfriend was part of the whole shit show. Mum had nothing to do with it and has stated she didn't know where he was. Mum may or may not have been a crap parent, who knows?

Interestingly a theory that mum was actually at the protests brandishing her own AR have circulated as well, complete with pictures. Found not to be accurate, but you can see how this misinformation effects people's viewpoint on the case. While stuff does get corrected many people don't realise or in many cases don't care.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You are overly desperate to insert race into something that was between evil white people.
The difference in the treatment of Rittenhouse compared to black people accused of murder suggests race might have something to do with this. If not in this actual case, certainly the difference in access to justice between races in the US has been amplified here.
 
OP was more concerned about who started the interaction between the male BLM protester and the Rittenhouse supporter than the actual issue is that the Male BLM protester was violent toward the female Rittenhouse supporter. It doesn't matter who started what, we dont have enough info to determine that. Violence towards women is not ok. And diverting the conversation to semantics because it fits someone's political agenda, rather than dealing with and acknowledging the real issue, is exactly why we have an issue with FV in our country. Doing so....to deliberately mislead...is a condonement of the perps behaviour and makes you as bad as the perp.
That's quite the convoluted justification for an invented statement on your part.
 
The difference in the treatment of Rittenhouse compared to black people accused of murder suggests race might have something to do with this. If not in this actual case, certainly the difference in access to justice between races in the US has been amplified here.
You are blind to reality.
But race is not central to this case and won't/ shouldn't have any bearing on the outcome. It's a side point at best. It is relevant only as to why people were there in the first place. The relevance of the failings of the legal system is a 'whataboutism' isn't it?
 
The difference in the treatment of Rittenhouse compared to black people accused of murder suggests race might have something to do with this. If not in this actual case, certainly the difference in access to justice between races in the US has been amplified here.
So white people should be treated worse by the courts or black people better? Or meet halfway?

In this case?

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk
 
I tend to agree with Paul Keating that America is no longer a civil society.
Any civil society would condemn these blatant vigilante killings.
It's a racist country where white people get different treatment under the law.
The fact that murdered people in this case can't be referred to as victims confirms this.
The country has no gun control, there's regular school shootings, millions of homeless people, no universal health care and this Rittenhouse kid walking around the court like he owns the place.
 
I tend to agree with Paul Keating that America is no longer a civil society.
Any civil society would condemn these blatant vigilante killings.
It's a racist country where white people get different treatment under the law.
The fact that murdered people in this case can't be referred to as victims confirms this.
The country has no gun control, there's regular school shootings, millions of homeless people, no universal health care and this Rittenhouse kid walking around the court like he owns the place.
That's bait.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

race is not central to this case
Emblem of gun totin’ purity (a fire fighter, medic and cop rolled into one) defeats paedo BLM leftists.

Yeah race is totes absent from this scene.
 
He drove across state lines to an anti-racism protest with a loaded gun and killed two protesters, that's the facts.
Bro the gun was in the state he traveled to. That makes it fine!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It seems important to you. Has no bearing inside the court room or shouldn't.
Oh come on. Personalise it to me rather than face reality. :laughv1:

I keep saying the court room is not the focus of my observations.
 
I tend to agree with Paul Keating that America is no longer a civil society.
Any civil society would condemn these blatant vigilante killings.
It's a racist country where white people get different treatment under the law.
The fact that murdered people in this case can't be referred to as victims confirms this.
The country has no gun control, there's regular school shootings, millions of homeless people, no universal health care and this Rittenhouse kid walking around the court like he owns the place.
It's well on the way to becoming a failed state. It's slowly but surely disintegrating.

The problem isn't so much the US's failings but rather its complete incapacity to address those failings.
 
It seems important to you. Has no bearing inside the court room or shouldn't.
Situations like this always involve a broader picture and discussion.
 
Why not? Plenty of other threads for you to say the same things over and over again.
When you listen, then we can move on.

It is inconceivable that with even just a smattering of understanding of US history you could see this as anything but race based.
 
Emblem of gun totin’ purity (a fire fighter, medic and cop rolled into one) defeats paedo BLM leftists.

Yeah race is totes absent from this scene.

You're the only one saying the paedo was a BLM leftist. He was yelling the N word repeatedly before running into Rittenhouse. Not really the action of someone there for BLM.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom