Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2002
- Posts
- 91,008
- Reaction score
- 236,667
- Location
- Port Adelaide 5015
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Staff
- #1
According to 7 news. Essendon interested.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Ford Fairlane said:According to 7 news. Essendon interested.
Stiffy_18 said:Sheedy must have done a HUGE backflip for him to be interested in Ladhams again
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Stiffy_18 said:Told by the AFC his services were no longer required. Apparently essendon is interested. Sheedy must have done a HUGE backflip for him to be interested in Ladhams again
Will he go into the PSD, or will we get some value back for Ladhams - ie. 4th round pick or perhaps a like fringe player from the Dons.Ford Fairlane said:According to 7 news. Essendon interested.
West AdelaideKane I would think he would go in PS draft and we get nothing - but its not as we had anything in the first placeKane McGoodwin said:Will he go into the PSD, or will we get some value back for Ladhams - ie. 4th round pick or perhaps a like fringe player from the Dons.

Meh, not fussed either way.Kane McGoodwin said:Will he go into the PSD, or will we get some value back for Ladhams - ie. 4th round pick or perhaps a like fringe player from the Dons.

I'm not fussed if we get nothing for him either.Stiffy_18 said:Meh, not fussed either way.
No big loss. We won't get much for him anyway. No point getting a pick that we aren't plannning on using.
True but if you trade for a draft pick, you MUST use it. So there is no point of us trading Ladhams for say 4th round pick when we are unlikely to use it. Might as well let him go for nothingKane McGoodwin said:I'm not fussed if we get nothing for him either.
Anything for Ladhams would be a bonus, considering he has no future at AFC.

Kane McGoodwin said:I'm not fussed if we get nothing for him either.
Anything for Ladhams would be a bonus, considering he has no future at AFC.
noddy said:Knowing Sheedy he might say to Ladhams that he would pick him up in the PS draft & then turn his back on him for old times sake.

Springy, we will delist more. We always hold off until after the trade period to announce our delistings in case there is someone interested to pick up our rubbish and we get someting of value to uf for the player we plan cutting.SpringChoke said:Why would the AFC only release one player? I'm hoping liking hell they intend to delist more than just Ladhams. I know they have to delist three, so counting Stevo as the second, would mean they need to delist one more. I'm hoping they delist more than 2 though ( excluding the Stevo retirment ), otherwise it will take us at least 5 years to clear out the rubbish.
SpringChoke said:Why would the AFC only release one player? I'm hoping liking hell they intend to delist more than just Ladhams. I know they have to delist three, so counting Stevo as the second, would mean they need to delist one more. I'm hoping they delist more than 2 though ( excluding the Stevo retirment ), otherwise it will take us at least 5 years to clear out the rubbish.
). I wish hehehe 