Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. List Management 2022

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jim. Jim. Jim.

Please separate out the facts from opinions. Calories are calories. The same as kilograms are kilograms.

Calories OUT take into account the thermodynamic effect of different types of foods. For example a calorie of protein IN also results in some proportion of OUT- an ever so slightly higher proportion of OUT than a calorie of carbs.
Every single molecule that is a key part of bioenergetic processes has a different calorie value per gram, and those are still just more precise estimates. Every single human can burn through these differently due to how their muscles work, how their cell mitochondria work, how the organisms in their digestive track interact with it, their liver, general availability of other components of the biologic processes, other processes making use of particular molecules... a whole host of factors.

What's more, a person's cell mitochondria can change in terms of optimal function for a variety of environmental reasons, including change in diet, not just a change in calorie intake.
BUT

Calories in Vs calories OUT is ALL encompassing. Anyone who says otherwise does NOT understand what a calorie actually is.
It's really not, and I'm half tempted to see if you can even define what a calorie is.
Now if you mean that you can lose weight in but have different composition of weight loss sure. Presumably most people by now realise that when you’re losing weight you should keep protein high and keep weight on the bar in the gym else you’ll probably lose muscle. ALTHOUGH even then it’s been shown (by McDonald and others) that you can regain lost muscle relatively easily. It’s a lot harder to GAIN muscle than REgain.
You also have a minimum amount of fat you can consume, otherwise it becomes hazardous to your health. This assists with cellular function and hormone synthesis, fat-soluble nutrient uptake, to name a few.
I happen to think Stocker needs to lose both muscle and fat. I once recall reading of a sports scientist who held the opinion Kouta was a wondeful athelte ‘but they made him get too big’.

I think Stocker is 5kg too big. If he lost it and it turned out that was wrong, the muscle loss wouldn’t be that hard to regain.
He's listed as 86, which is just the 3 kgs above his junior weight, but I tend to agree that he's probably closer to 90kgs than that, say 88.

I think he doesn't need to lose any total muscle, just not work on his upper body quite so strongly. I think he'd play well enough at around 85kgs, but that's an indirect measure of the kind of physical performance you want to see from him. He needs to be a hair quicker, and he certainly needs to be more consistent in his first steps, and generally more economical with how he runs in open space, particularly when he's not going at 90%+ max.
 
Stocker plays AFL too much like a rugby player would - all burst speed- needs to develop AFL type running power, enough to provide for some overlap give and receive running or chase down tackling as opposed to specialising in intercept hits - if he does- he would be a weapon and could easily transition to midfield - which is what he was recruited to be.
 
Really, that’s your take? I’d think that’s actually pretty accurate, he wouldn’t be demanding dollars at all just a couple years and game time to prove/show he’s got it & the next contract would be for something more substantial
Played alright in the VFL final. Found plenty of ball and was reasonably clean. He is improving and I hope there is more to come...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Back to list management

Another dangerous forward, likely to replace Owies. Either comes from changing a role of a current player, or we outsource

A readymade KPP as cover, cheap is fine

Outside speed/footskills

Draft a KPP and said outside speed/footskills

More mongrel
Is Aarts any good?

Not getting opportunity with Tigs.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Stocker plays AFL too much like a rugby player would - all burst speed- needs to develop AFL type running power, enough to provide for some overlap give and receive running or chase down tackling as opposed to specialising in intercept hits - if he does- he would be a weapon and could easily transition to midfield - which is what he was recruited to be.
Wouldn't mind a Diesel MKII, or a high torque EV equivalent in the midfield.
 
Jon Ralph reporting that we are on track to land Blake Acres, and we are his strong preferred destination.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Jon Ralph reporting that we are on track to land Blake Acres, and we are his strong preferred destination.

I know someone who knows Blake. The deal to us is all but done and is just waiting on Freo to finish the season. Freo have really lowballed him. They will land Jackson as a result.

I think this is the consensus through AFL media anyway.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I’d like to see them announce new contracts for Stocker and setters this week.

They both deserve it.

I am happy for them to wait until after our VFL campaign finishes up.

If it helps the two of them remain hungry to perform then that's an advantage - albeit a small one - we should be looking to exploit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top