- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Posts
- 3,846
- Reaction score
- 3,084
- Location
- Albertron
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Roll Tide Alabama Crimson Tide
mitani ???i think i will take that with a grain of salt.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

mitani ???i think i will take that with a grain of salt.....
He's absolutely a fan favorite.
Alright now my source is usually dead on, but as I said. It's open to interpretation.
Hartlett is a chicken stew man, rather than beef. Hartlett to sydney roosters confirmed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That...that is salary cap pressure...
Never heard of so many post season trade rumours involving Port Adelaide players. Most of it is just media driven speculation to try to destabilise the club.
Never heard of so many post season trade rumours involving Port Adelaide players. Most of it is just media driven speculation to try to destabilise the club.
They're just shaking the tree hoping like hell a top 22 player shakes loose.
It's nothing more than fear
What opposition clubs and the media don't seem to understand is how tight our club and playing group is. The fact is that nobody actually wants to go anywhere. And why would they? You can offer Hartlett whatever you like but he's going to re-sign for less because he wants to win a flag at Port with his teammates. You can do the same with Wines and Wingard, rinse and repeat. It's the Geelong model.
They say loyalty is dead and that football clubs are a business now. 'They' are obviously not Port Adelaide.
Can't make direct contact with a targeted player, but can contact his manager and get the player to inspect the deal.I could be completely wrong here and just pulled this from no where but I thought it was against the rules to put a contract in front of a contracted player from an opposition team? Aka what's happening with Hartlett by both Richmond and north Melbourne apparently big offers for multiple years for big money. Isn't that what the whole betts and Adelaide scenario was about late last year? Although I would be highly shocked if he left it seems a little unfair that unless a players shows a desire to leave that teams shouldn't be allowed to offer contract terms to another teams contracted player. Could be wrong though.
Ahk that's where was confused then. Cheers. Hartlett is to young for nth Melbourne anyway so can disregard them, they have podsy to chase after his retirementCan't make direct contact with a targeted player, but can contact his manager and get the player to inspect the deal.
Can't make direct contact with a targeted player, but can contact his manager and get the player to inspect the deal.

What opposition clubs and the media don't seem to understand is how tight our club and playing group is. The fact is that nobody actually wants to go anywhere. And why would they? You can offer Hartlett whatever you like but he's going to re-sign for less because he wants to win a flag at Port with his teammates. You can do the same with Wines and Wingard, rinse and repeat. It's the Geelong model.
They say loyalty is dead and that football clubs are a business now. 'They' are obviously not Port Adelaide.
I guess they see players leaving The Crows left, right and centre and figure it must be a South Australian epidemic.
Want more clues from Arsene Wenger
And what about the rumour of Port really into the men? I thought it might be an anagram of Intotheportmen but the closest I could get with that was Natalie Portman.
Want more clues from Arsene Wenger
And what about the rumour of Port really into the men? I thought it might be an anagram of Intotheportmen but the closest I could get with that was Natalie Portman.
I wonder who we have our eyes on in the draft to replace the talls we sacked. What we have done with some very late picks this year is amazing.