Locked thread - why?

[skipper kelly]

 

[otaku]

Sure thing champ.

so, who was p|ssing in your cornflaks DD?

For some reason the idea of a thread on public forum being the private enclave of juveniles annoys me. Not sure why, what do you think big boy?

so, you on the PMT train at the moment DD? Seems that way, cause you sure are whinging like a bitch.

No it wasn't and you know that. Keep dreaming. As I say, three or four einsteins like yourself kept making the souffle rise.

no wonder you think we are einsteins, when you can't even count to 15. Go look at the list mantis posted champ. 15 people with 20 or more posts in that thread.

Stop dreaming tiger. It seems reality is escaping you. How's this for an analogy - I could start a new thread; engage 1 or 2 other posters in a discussion about whatever. The said thread has no interest whatsoever to anybody else yet because I feel like continually bumping it back to the top with a pointless comment or two the thing lingers forever. Others chip in very occasionally and bingo we have a "popular" thread. Yet to you it's a popular thread - as I say deluded.
Got it?

however, as I pointed out before, your analogy is totally wrong. Sure 4 people have very high counts - but there was interest that was widespread.

So, how about you stop indulging in your little bitch session eh? So what if you arn't interested in it - other people were.

Pretty simple, eh champ?

 

[Dippers Donuts]

so, who was p|ssing in your cornflaks DD?



so, you on the PMT train at the moment DD? Seems that way, cause you sure are whinging like a bitch.



no wonder you think we are einsteins, when you can't even count to 15. Go look at the list mantis posted champ. 15 people with 20 or more posts in that thread.



however, as I pointed out before, your analogy is totally wrong. Sure 4 people have very high counts - but there was interest that was widespread.

So, how about you stop indulging in your little bitch session eh? So what if you arn't interested in it - other people were.

Pretty simple, eh champ?

So much material, so little motivation.

Suffice to say, back to the peanut gallery for you.

Champ.

 

[Frodo]

Maybe because Adrian thought it had come down to an argument between 4 people mainly.

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 1,335
User Name Posts
bunsen burner 212
otaku 186
skipper kelly 181
notenoughteams 102
toulairene 84
funkyfreo 65
Fire Storm 55
Bartholin Juice 45
Roylion 41
Jumpin' Jimmy 32
evo 31
Frodo 29
Swarbs 26
DonFan 23
MonkeyButterer 21
Lestat 21
PA HOG 17
medusala 15
Weaver 15
Moo 11
butterflykiss 9
Grendel 7
purplesoul 7
Bombers 2003 7
Mero 7
PerthCrow 6
dan warna 6
Mark Perica 5
llosis 5
theGimp 5
Bentleigh 4
Dippers Donuts 4
Groves 4
The invisible mullet 4
carringbush 4
goaldrush1977 3
1jasonoz 3
W W Biscuit 3
hoss 3
FIGJAM 2
niko 2
Rookie 2
JavaBlue 2
eagleskickass 1
Dr Sbagman 1
demon_dave 1
Goldenblue 1
PAFC2004 1
Tim56 1
Pornstar 1
MightyFighting 1
Porthos 1
Joel 1
billy big ears 1
DaveW 1
fatmike 1
Mr Q 1
Birdy 1
Kapow!!! 1
^Eagle^ 1
BomberGal 1
NMWBloods 1
Show Thread & Close Window

That's 62 individuals who not only read but contributed to the thread.

That seems to make it a very good thread, you make good justification for why it should NOT be closed, and I can't understand why it has been closed,

 

[Jumpin' Jimmy]

Hypocrisy of Christianity thread has been locked.

Groves, Why?

Still no official reason given Groves.

Was it A) too highbrow, or B) because Bun Burner finally learnt how to spell "hypocrisy"?

 

[otaku]

Still waiting on a reason here Groves