Remove this Banner Ad

Scandal Luke Slayers

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Slayers now being sued by his own wife.

It is alleged that as part of the AFL Commission’s investigation into the nude photo scandal, Sayers provided the Commission with a statutory declaration that made several highly damaging and inaccurate claims about his wife Cate, her actions and her mental health.

Lawyers for Ms Sayers have commenced defamation proceedings in the Victorian Supreme Court, claiming her husband’s false statements have unfairly and significantly damaged her reputation in football and business circles.
Sounds like she is doing the George Constanza “Double Dip” and will have 2 sources of income.

1. This defamation case.
2. The divorce proceedings.

She should proceed with a quick resolution on #2 and get 50% of the pie. And then get another piece of him later when #1 gets into court, or mediation. Best of luck to her.

I’m sure Andrew Dillion is doing a belt and braces review of the special investigation integrity groups work here. They could not smell BS at a Cattle Farm by the looks of it.
 
Sounds like she is doing the George Constanza “Double Dip” and will have 2 sources of income.

1. This defamation case.
2. The divorce proceedings.

She should proceed with a quick resolution on #2 and get 50% of the pie. And then get another piece of him later when #1 gets into court, or mediation. Best of luck to her.

I’m sure Andrew Dillion is doing a belt and braces review of the special investigation integrity groups work here. They could not smell BS at a Cattle Farm by the looks of it.

haha-hotday.gif
 
he has allegedly tried to play the “scorned woman seeks revenge due to instability” angle and it’s now potentially imploding in his face more so than if he just owned his alleged behaviour.

Spicy. Allegedly.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Surely the business his runs goes under. Who'd do business with him.

A small number of high-value clients. He’s spent his working life as a consultant. The job is basically to ingratiate yourself (“network”) with big business and government by rubbing shoulders with the right people, then skimming cash off them for “consulting”.

That lark won’t end, he still has his same slippery mates.
 
A Supreme Court defamation trial between Sayers and his wife, who has accused him of falsely blaming her for the penis post in order to exonerate himself, has the potential to expose the inner workings of the AFL and its legendary ability to reach a predetermined outcome.

Hilarious that it's Sayers' little member that outs the corrupt campaigners

 
A Supreme Court defamation trial between Sayers and his wife, who has accused him of falsely blaming her for the penis post in order to exonerate himself, has the potential to expose the inner workings of the AFL and its legendary ability to reach a predetermined outcome.

Hilarious that it's Sayers' little member that outs the corrupt campaigners

The afl are this close to exposing themselves, ironically enough
 
A small number of high-value clients. He’s spent his working life as a consultant. The job is basically to ingratiate yourself (“network”) with big business and government by rubbing shoulders with the right people, then skimming cash off them for “consulting”.

That lark won’t end, he still has his same slippery mates.
His best mate is Josh Frydenberg so I am sure he will continue to get plenty of consulting work.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If true, why would they circle the wagons in this way for Sayers?

I believe they would, but why? Seems like an easy “You’ve done this to yourself” situation.
Collateral damage, “Boys Club” mentality - if you believe the Warner angle this is your atypical example of it - it’s a great move to go down this track, to many with too much to lose if it were to go to trial means a nice settlement with a truckload of NDA’s
 
Collateral damage, “Boys Club” mentality - if you believe the Warner angle this is your atypical example of it - it’s a great move to go down this track, to many with too much to lose if it were to go to trial means a nice settlement with a truckload of NDA’s
Let's hope she decides to burn it all down.
the joker GIF
 
I feel sorry for the guy. His wife steals his phone, takes a picture of his dick without him knowing, then posts it to social media tagging a random women. I bet he’s glad he’s out of that relationship.

That now seems to be his story. And she’s suing him for defamation.

Who knows what happened?
 
The kids will end up hating either one or both of the parents.

If Sayers wasn’t hacked, it is such a grubby way to weasel out of responsibility for the photo. Despicable really, and way worse than the actual affair.
 
The kids will end up hating either one or both of the parents.

If Sayers wasn’t hacked, it is such a grubby way to weasel out of responsibility for the photo. Despicable really, and way worse than the actual affair.

Not even an affair, the woman has never so much as had a cocktail with him.
 
The kids will end up hating either one or both of the parents.

If Sayers wasn’t hacked, it is such a grubby way to weasel out of responsibility for the photo. Despicable really, and way worse than the actual affair.
In an extraordinary statement released on Friday, Bronte and Claudia Sayers said they regretted that the dispute continued to play out in public, but would support Dad if required.


From herald sun

 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The kids will end up hating either one or both of the parents.

If Sayers wasn’t hacked, it is such a grubby way to weasel out of responsibility for the photo. Despicable really, and way worse than the actual affair.
Stock standard behaviour for this type, never thought he’d be called on it
 
Collateral damage, “Boys Club” mentality - if you believe the Warner angle this is your atypical example of it - it’s a great move to go down this track, to many with too much to lose if it were to go to trial means a nice settlement with a truckload of NDA’s

Probably knows where the AFL buried the bodies, must be protected to stop him going rogue for a big media paycheck.
 
Two of the four daughters. Interesting.

They clearly feel strongly about it, which is their right. Personally, I feel my only response would be to change my surname and not utter a word in public. How ****ing embarrassing to have your parent/s playing up like this.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom