Remove this Banner Ad

Mark Johnson & Kepler Bradley?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Aug 16, 2006
1,405
55
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Both delisted by essendon today. Johnson has the toughness that the young blokes could benefit a lot from but at 29 years of age is risky while bradley is still very young and in my opinion, has potential. Is it worth looking to pick up one of these players in the PSD?
 
Bradley maybe if there is nothing else, why not really, still young, not like we are giving a spot to someone stealing it from a youth, if he earns a spot from the VFL then so be it.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Kepler is the biggest dudd ever! Sentanta has achieved more in football and he's only been playing the game for 2 years compared to KB who has been playing all his life!

We don't neen Johnson either, if it was 1997 we probably would have got him, but this is the new Carlton.......we need youth!
 
If we get this hack I will have some serious doubts about our recruiting staff. He is terrible. He makes walking look difficult FFS.
 
lol. How many times have you brought him up Bluebear? :D:p
It's a nervous stutter and I'm a little sensitive about it if you don't mind..................[cough*Rutten*cough]:D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Does anyone else feel sorry for Kepler. Knights refused to trade him to Freo for pick 56 and then delisted him. Why couldn't they do Kepler the favour Geelong did King and Callan. Dog act by Knights for mine.
 
Does anyone else feel sorry for Kepler. Knights refused to trade him to Freo for pick 56 and then delisted him. Why couldn't they do Kepler the favour Geelong did King and Callan. Dog act by Knights for mine.

i wouldn't blame it all on essendon - they initially asked for higher draft choices from freo and then agreed on pick 40. then freo withdrew and offered pick 56 and essendon told them where to stick it and called their bluff. if freo really want him and miss out they only have themselves to blame as all they had to do was give up pick 40.
 
i wouldn't blame it all on essendon - they initially asked for higher draft choices from freo and then agreed on pick 40. then freo withdrew and offered pick 56 and essendon told them where to stick it and called their bluff. if freo really want him and miss out they only have themselves to blame as all they had to do was give up pick 40.

Yeah but Freo likely withdrew pick 40 because they realised Essendon were going to delist him anyway. If your going to delist the bloke and there is a trade on the table that isn't going to be improved just accept it and help Kepler on his way. Creating goodwill at the trade table and amongest the playing group is very important and here, within a month of being appointed a coach, Knights is making life tough for poor Kelper for no gain.
 
Does anyone else feel sorry for Kepler. Knights refused to trade him to Freo for pick 56 and then delisted him. Why couldn't they do Kepler the favour Geelong did King and Callan. Dog act by Knights for mine.

Knights was just doing Freo a favour....Knights knows Kepler is the biggest dud in town and wanted to be honest....best thing for Kepler is to play in the local under 12's for a while and see if he can get a kick....

All those Carlton fans who think Kepler would be good must be living on Mars, he couldn't get a game at Essendon.....they have the worst list in the AFL along with Richmond....thats why nobody would trade with them...so why do Carlton need Kepler?? no reason...we simply don't!!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

hate to say it i wouldnt mind seeing mark johnson in the navy blue, could be a great back pocket player for the blues, his also very hard at it
for what.......2 or 3 years?

If we pick up Johnson, Lance would have evry right to egg the club.........don't push him........he'll do it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mark Johnson & Kepler Bradley?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top