Remove this Banner Ad

Martin Hardie: I write the forms... I think Evans ran the program

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
On March 9, they reportedly had the following exchange:

Hird: "Good work today mate, the boys were up and about, we have a lot to work with.

Dank: "IVs start next week and Thymosin with Uniquinon. We will start to see some real effects.

Then between March 27-28:

Dank: "That is the IV list that will be completed by Wednesday night.

Hird: "Good work mate, (name deleted) rang me tonight and said how good he felt after he saw you."

On April 3, Dank detailed more substances:

"We have cerebrolysin, we will re-oxygenate and re-circulate the brain. We will also be getting Solcoseryl."

Also in April:

Dank: "All IV and injections completed.

Hird: "Great work mate, it would be a great effort to have them feeling fresh for Anzac Day."

On May 11, Dank talks about an unspecified project.

"financials ready for you and David for AOD project. These financials cover all possible revenue streams, where the project applies."

Evans runs a broking firm, nothing unusual about a company coming in to present its case to try and raise funds/get support in the market. This has all been dealt with.
 
I for one wouldn't ever purchase a book written by Marin Hardie. I wonder what would it be advertised under....fiction?

Recreation - Sea Kayaking
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Booby Charlton = Martin Hardie?

Is it true?
That's what the kids are saying these days.

Go easy on him though. He'll tweet about you, if you don't.
 
Evans runs a broking firm, nothing unusual about a company coming in to present its case to try and raise funds/get support in the market. This has all been dealt with.

There is a lot unusual about it.
There are hundreds of broking firms and literally tens of thousands of companies seeking funds.

It cant be just a coincidence that he attended a meeting with them in Jan 2012 and a few months later 30 odd blokes at his footy club are injecting said substance.
 
Last edited:
I for one wouldn't ever purchase a book written by Marin Hardie. I wonder what would it be advertised under....fiction?
Fantasy.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Evans runs a broking firm, nothing unusual about a company coming in to present its case to try and raise funds/get support in the market. This has all been dealt with.

I would have thought it depends very much on exactly what they're raising funds for, and who stands to benefit. This is a public company and disclosure rules certainly apply.

Then, of course, there's the conflict of interest argument. Hint: Calzada present to Hird and Evans, at a meeting arranged by a sports scientist, they own the IP for an unapproved drug, AOD9604, and shortly after that same sports scientist starts injecting the drug into employees of the organisation run by the 2 blokes who met with the IP owner (note: not employees of the broking firm). Later it's revealed the sports scientist is using cocktails inclusive of the previously mentioned drug, and an S2 banned substance, which is in line with the public statements (incl to the ASX) of the IP owner on how they were going to develop (read monetise) their unapproved drug i.e. in combination.

Might you be able to help with what the "revenue streams" and the "financials" for "the "AOD project", mentioned by Dank to Hird in an SMS, might have been, 'cos I'm way beyond Just Interested?
 
I would have thought it depends very much on exactly what they're raising funds for, and who stands to benefit. This is a public company and disclosure rules certainly apply.

Then, of course, there's the conflict of interest argument. Hint: Calzada present to Hird and Evans, at a meeting arranged by a sports scientist, they own the IP for an unapproved drug, AOD9604, and shortly after that same sports scientist starts injecting the drug into employees of the organisation run by the 2 blokes who met with the IP owner (note: not employees of the broking firm). Later it's revealed the sports scientist is using cocktails inclusive of the previously mentioned drug, and an S2 banned substance, which is in line with the public statements (incl to the ASX) of the IP owner on how they were going to develop (read monetise) their unapproved drug i.e. in combination.

Might you be able to help with what the "revenue streams" and the "financials" for "the "AOD project", mentioned by Dank to Hird in an SMS, might have been, 'cos I'm way beyond Just Interested?
Tread carefully.

Kwality doesn't like it when people mention the "financials".
 
Go for it. I'm off duty.

I tend to do that, once I come to understand what in the hell has been going on. I'm comfortable I reached that point some time in mid 2013.

All you have to do is follow de money.

Here's a question: why was the Calzada Chairman deposed at the AGM last November, when a few weeks before he was expecting to be reelected unopposed? And, why has he repeatedly refused to answer any questions from a journalist who has won numerous Walkleys, which only recently have had anything to do with sport?

I do a shirtload of wondering.
 
I tend to do that, once I come to understand what in the hell has been going on. I'm comfortable I reached that point some time in mid 2013.

All you have to do is follow de money.

Here's a question: why was the Calzada Chairman deposed at the AGM last November, when a few weeks before he was expecting to be reelected unopposed? And, why has he repeatedly refused to answer any questions from a journalist who has won numerous Walkleys, which only recently have had anything to do with sport?

I do a shirtload of wondering.
Wasn't aware that the Chairman was dumped. Out of interest, do you know how the shareholding stacks up. Who was the putsch?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

There is a lot unusual about it.
There are hundreds of broking firms and literally tens of thousands of companies seeking funds.

It cant be just a coincidence that he attended a meeting with them in Jan 2012 and a few months later 30 odd blokes at his footy club are injecting said substance.

Thedeal was put to him by someone & he listened, simple as that. Its scurrilous/bog ignorant to represent that as 'a smoking gun'.
 
Thedeal was put to him by someone & he listened, simple as that. Its scurrilous/bog ignorant to represent that as 'a smoking gun'.
Just one of the many coincidences in the whole script though.
 
On March 9, they reportedly had the following exchange:

Hird: "Good work today mate, the boys were up and about, we have a lot to work with.

Dank: "IVs start next week and Thymosin with Uniquinon. We will start to see some real effects.

Then between March 27-28:

Dank: "That is the IV list that will be completed by Wednesday night.

Hird: "Good work mate, (name deleted) rang me tonight and said how good he felt after he saw you."

On April 3, Dank detailed more substances:

"We have cerebrolysin, we will re-oxygenate and re-circulate the brain. We will also be getting Solcoseryl."

Also in April:

Dank: "All IV and injections completed.

Hird: "Great work mate, it would be a great effort to have them feeling fresh for Anzac Day."

On May 11, Dank talks about an unspecified project.

"financials ready for you and David for AOD project. These financials cover all possible revenue streams, where the project applies."
Name deleted might be in a bit of strife
 
I would have thought it depends very much on exactly what they're raising funds for, and who stands to benefit. This is a public company and disclosure rules certainly apply.

Then, of course, there's the conflict of interest argument. Hint: Calzada present to Hird and Evans, at a meeting arranged by a sports scientist, they own the IP for an unapproved drug, AOD9604, and shortly after that same sports scientist starts injecting the drug into employees of the organisation run by the 2 blokes who met with the IP owner (note: not employees of the broking firm). Later it's revealed the sports scientist is using cocktails inclusive of the previously mentioned drug, and an S2 banned substance, which is in line with the public statements (incl to the ASX) of the IP owner on how they were going to develop (read monetise) their unapproved drug i.e. in combination.

Might you be able to help with what the "revenue streams" and the "financials" for "the "AOD project", mentioned by Dank to Hird in an SMS, might have been, 'cos I'm way beyond Just Interested?


Mate that's just the way broking works.

It's a relationship based industry and this is how deals get done every day. In this case Evans did not proceed and aod was not an issue re infractions. No financial benefit was obtained by Evans or hird.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just one of the many coincidences in the whole script though.

Nah just dank using the contacts he made at essendon to try and push an investment idea for aod. I've had three requests for meetings with biotechs in the last week.
 
Thedeal was put to him by someone & he listened, simple as that. Its scurrilous/bog ignorant to represent that as 'a smoking gun'.

Got a plausible explanation for the SMS where "revenue streams" (plural), and the "financials" for the "AOD project" being ready for "you and David" got mentioned, into 2012, and well after the late '11 meeting was held?

'Cos I ain't heard one yet. Just something plausible would do.
 
Yes, I agree they must be kids to be so easily taken in and so obsessed with the identity of an internet poster who so unsettles their hopes.
Why don't you clear this up simply and categorically deny that the person posting on the Bobby Charlton account is the Deakin University lecturer Martin Hardie?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top