- Joined
- Apr 1, 2011
- Posts
- 20,855
- Reaction score
- 28,302
- Location
- Radelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NAFC
Because he doesn't have 2 white parents?Why is a paid AFL official being allowed to tweet inflammatory tweets on the subject?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Because he doesn't have 2 white parents?Why is a paid AFL official being allowed to tweet inflammatory tweets on the subject?
He replied:
"@DarylAdair thanks mate. Complex situation. Some understand, most don't but overall it's the right thing."
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.Then ALi Fahour retweeted this:
Karl Jackson @k_jacko
Matt Rendell digging a deep hole. "They" "Their" "Aboriginal Life" Good model is to get them to leave home at 14. No, not racist at all...
Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.
Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.
I'm not convinced that anyone has told us the whole truth so far, including Rendell. We're getting bits & pieces from here & there, all of them with the "truth as they saw it", but so far there is no one cohesive story - neither Rendell's, Trigg's, Vlad's or any of his minions.We'd love to understand, but, at this point, only one person seems to have made an attempt to help us do that, and it certainly isn't Misfud.
Everyone else is just doing their darndest to cover it up.
I'm not convinced that anyone has told us the whole truth so far, including Rendell. We're getting bits & pieces from here & there, all of them with the "truth as they saw it", but so far there is no one cohesive story - neither Rendell's, Trigg's, Vlad's or any of his minions.
I'm certain there's more to it than what Rendell told last night. I'm not saying Rendell is a liar - far from it. I believe he told the truth as he knew it, but maybe didn't tell the whole story (I'm certain there was more to the discussion than what has been made public). I'm also certain that there's a larger picture of which he is unaware.
Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.
I am speculating here, but I wonder if Trigg was so disinclined to go into bat for Rendell, because Matt did, indeed, deliberately include our club in that infamous quotation. Even if he was talking in hypotheticals, he chose to include Adelaide because he might actually believe we'd adopt a policy like that in the future.
If Rendell is to be believed on how we handled Milera, then it certainly seems like we don't have a lot of patience with young aboriginal footballers who are struggling to make the transition. Can anyone really see us picking up a bloke like Jurrah? We rarely ever take risks like that. We've made it known that we prefer squeaky clean academic types. Maybe Rendell would like us to be more open to drafting aboriginal players from rural areas, but the club has been against the idea, and took Rendell's comments as an attack on them. Rendell certainly seems as if he's been dissatisfied at our club for a while now - perhaps this was why.
Just a thought.
Flawed analogy, yes, but the fundamental thought process behind it is very, very similar.That's a flawed analogy, and you're smart enough to know why, but I must admit I was quite uncomfortable with Rendell's solutioneering, and his wording of it. It made it much easier to see how he's managed to get himself into this situation.
Nah of course we would welcome them. Do you think they are likely to get up on a table in only boxers?Even if he was talking in hypotheticals, he chose to include Adelaide because he might actually believe we'd adopt a policy like that in the future.
If Rendell is to be believed on how we handled Milera, then it certainly seems like we don't have a lot of patience with young aboriginal footballers who are struggling to make the transition. Can anyone really see us picking up a bloke like Jurrah? We rarely ever take risks like that. We've made it known that we prefer squeaky clean academic types.
Just a thought.
As distinct from the stolen generation, the premise of which was to better integrate them into white society so that they could have success in the long run and have lives of value?You do realise that the premise of the idea is to better integrate them into the afl system so they can have sucess in the long run with what they ARE talented at! Stolen generation....your a joke!
Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.
We definitely need to hear more from Misfud and Ali Fahour, neither of whom have said anything in public at all. We've heard directly contrasting quotes from them by Thomas & Trigg, so what is their side of the story? It's fairly obvious from Fahour's twitters what his opinion of the matter is - and he's clearly not a Rendell fan.Sure, but at least he's offered context. We've just had a horrible soundbite come out of Misfud, and then nothing. Meanwhile, Vlad and Trig point fingers based on this soundbite, but do nothing at all to back it up, besides mysteriously claiming "there's more to the story."
If he wasn't to call them, a community that he isn't a part of, "them" or "their", what is he supposed to call them? This is political correctness going to ridiculous extremes. Racism is only racism if there is hatred or an intent to hurt behind it. Not if you simply refer to a community that you don't feel a part of by the word "them". They call themselves "we", or "brothers", etc. does that make them racist?Interesting.. gives legs to my comment earlier about his whole academy proposal being fundamentally racist and similar in concept to the whole "Stolen Generations" issue.
That's pretty bloody easy to answer. One group were taken AGAINST THEIR WILL. The other are getting an opportunity that they are completely free to knock back, or turn their back on, at any time. That is one of the biggest differences you could possibly imagine. It's like the difference between rape and consentual sex. Taken without context they look remarkably similar, but put in their full context there is a massive difference, as most would acknowledge.As distinct from the stolen generation, the premise of which was to better integrate them into white society so that they could have success in the long run and have lives of value?
The language is so transparently similar that the ideas are almost identical. One is fundamentally racist - how can the other one not be?
Denial is not a river in Egypt. Just because you don't like the message I have, does not mean that I'm not getting close to the truth. It certainly sounds like it, based on Fahour's comments.spare me, i think a lot of aboriginal parents as with parents of all races would love to have their kids to get the chance of a scholarship in a well respected school. My mum hoped i would get one as a young fella as we were quite a poor family and she wanted the best possible education possible for me, this didnt eventuate but please dont relate this too the stolen generation.
Could Mifsud have told Trigg he was offended? Is that why he might have thought that?
As distinct from the stolen generation, the premise of which was to better integrate them into white society so that they could have success in the long run and have lives of value?
The language is so transparently similar that the ideas are almost identical. One is fundamentally racist - how can the other one not be?
its called a CHOICE!I feel the urge to offically complain about Ali and his twittering.
surely the AFL needs to take action against a guy clearly out to inflame