MCG to host GF through to 2057

(Log in to remove this ad.)

blue harvest

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Posts
9,259
Likes
11,355
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Even if they waited until 2030 or so, the outcome would be the same. The Vic Gov would be throwing money at it and the MCC would funding a new Southern Stand or some other development and we'd be having the same capacity/tradition/rotation/homegf arguments with the same outcome.

Having a GF in Perth or Adelaide doesn't grow the game or magically make it a national comp, GWS v Richmond in Perth lol, it would just cheapen the prestige, would be like watching a week 1-3 final. The odds that you got a home GF under a rotation system would be pretty low. I think we worked out with Kranky Al once in 72 years for his Eagles.
 

Cuzz09

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Posts
18,505
Likes
4,357
Location
Adel - SA - Aust - Earth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Norwood & Liverpool.
Having a GF in Perth or Adelaide doesn't grow the game or magically make it a national comp, GWS v Richmond in Perth lol, it would just cheapen the prestige, would be like watching a week 1-3 final.
Yeah this is exactly how I feel.

I think though to be fair non vic teams should get minimum 2-3 games at the G in home and away season (or something)


On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

ziad

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 2, 2009
Posts
14,100
Likes
6,578
Location
Sydney
AFL Club
West Coast
Yes, i'd rather wait 15-20 years so a bidding war can happen between the current stadiums so the AFL gets a much much better deal. With the rate technology is advancing, it could be a completely different landscape and the AFL has just bent over for bugger all when there was no hurry.

I can only see two reasons for extending a 20 year deal by another 20.

1 - AFL is not national at all and they have no desire to have a fair and equitable sport or ever even consider moving the GF for any reason.
2 - The AFL is petrified about other sports or entertainment events that might take the GF off their hands and out of Melbourne if they don't lock it away.

Either option is weak from the current commission and they have clearly opted not to put their head over the ball.
Option 3 - brown paper bags between Gil and the Vic Govt is more likely
 

Madness101

All Australian
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Posts
794
Likes
1,268
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
I think their should some clause where if both sides in the grand final are from the same city, it gets played there. I don’t care about any logical argument about practicality of changing the venue 1 week from the day and all the already sold tickets.


Could you imagine a port v Adelaide grand final....IN ADELAIDE !

We would need to send the army in to keep the peace.
 

kranky al

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
14,323
Likes
16,857
Location
Greenough
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
east perth www.pixelpac.com.au
Even if they waited until 2030 or so, the outcome would be the same. The Vic Gov would be throwing money at it and the MCC would funding a new Southern Stand or some other development and we'd be having the same capacity/tradition/rotation/homegf arguments with the same outcome.

Having a GF in Perth or Adelaide doesn't grow the game or magically make it a national comp, GWS v Richmond in Perth lol, it would just cheapen the prestige, would be like watching a week 1-3 final. The odds that you got a home GF under a rotation system would be pretty low. I think we worked out with Kranky Al once in 72 years for his Eagles.
Its not just about getting a home gf

You are aware that if there were multiple venues the chances of meeting a tenant of the ground its on become exponentially lower as well dont you?

There are 2 chances in 18 of meeting adelaide or port in adelaide

Same same the eagles or dockers in perth

Ditto for sydney.

Chances of meeting an mcg tenant / regular

are what?

6/18

Or 1/3
 

blue harvest

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Posts
9,259
Likes
11,355
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Its not just about getting a home gf

You are aware that if there were multiple venues the chances of meeting a tenant of the ground its on become exponentially lower as well dont you?

There are 2 chances in 18 of meeting adelaide or port in adelaide

Same same the eagles or dockers in perth

Ditto for sydney.

Chances of meeting an mcg tenant / regular

are what?

6/18

Or 1/3
Of course I understand that, see my GWS v Richmond in Perth example, what a blast.

You obviously understand it more than most, but I think a lot of people think that they would end up with home GFs, when in fact it would be very unlikely, it was 1 in 72 years in the calculation I did assuming the alternating G/interstate model.
 

harrythetiger

Summited Everest 30/9/17
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Posts
10,071
Likes
25,355
Location
Hillary Step
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76ers
If we had built a 200000 seat stafium they still would have signed it - dont talk shit
I guess we'll never know until you put your money where your mouth is and build one that big. Then you can feel genuinely screwed by the AFL and whinge all you want.
 

kranky al

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
14,323
Likes
16,857
Location
Greenough
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
east perth www.pixelpac.com.au
I guess we'll never know until you put your money where your mouth is and build one that big. Then you can feel genuinely screwed by the AFL and whinge all you want.
Already answered that one - sporting grounds get built AFTER events are tendered for not before - and seeing as its twenty years before the old contract had finished and they resigned it with zero notice to interested parties you would be the dumbest c}#% on the face of the planet if you did build it.

What you do is what we did - and thats build xapacity for expansion
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

harrythetiger

Summited Everest 30/9/17
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Posts
10,071
Likes
25,355
Location
Hillary Step
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76ers
Already answered that one - sporting grounds get built AFTER events are tendered for not before - and seeing as its twenty years before the old contract had finished and they resigned it with zero notice to interested parties you would be the dumbest c}#% on the face of the planet if you did build it.

What you do is what we did - and thats build xapacity for expansion
Why couldn’t the WA government get on the front foot and strike a deal with the AFL? We build this, you give us this. Easier to sit there and complain I suppose
 

Purple Suit

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Posts
8,157
Likes
13,712
Location
Freo
AFL Club
Fremantle
Why couldn’t the WA government get on the front foot and strike a deal with the AFL? We build this, you give us this. Easier to sit there and complain I suppose
Your argument is flawed anyway. Sydney had a 110k stadium at one stage and the AFL had no interest in talking to them about fitting an extra 10k in for the GF. After all, it’s all about the numbers at the game....
 

kranky al

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
14,323
Likes
16,857
Location
Greenough
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
east perth www.pixelpac.com.au
Why couldn’t the WA government get on the front foot and strike a deal with the AFL? We build this, you give us this. Easier to sit there and complain I suppose
The mcg deal wasnt up for another 20 years

20 years dude - olympics - you know those massive sporting events involving 10s of thousands of athletes right?

The entire world is invited - you may have heard of them?

They build multiple stadiums and olympic villages - the whole kit and kaboodle - billions of dollars spent.


The Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics was a successful bid to host the Games of the XXXI Olympiad and the XV Paralympic Games, respectively. It was submitted on September 7, 2007, and recognized as an Applicant city by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) one week after.
9 years.



I dont think anybody felt like they had to get in 20 years before - AS THATS NOT HOW ANYONE DOES THAT SHIT.

Awarding an event for another 20 years 20 years before the event is due to be renewed isnt good business - it isnt anything but a preemptive strike - it was a dirty little backyard deal done by victorians for victorians - its the purest example possible that this is not a fuxxn national league and it never will be.
 

Roovolution

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Posts
6,770
Likes
9,393
AFL Club
Adelaide
I think their should some clause where if both sides in the grand final are from the same city, it gets played there. I don’t care about any logical argument about practicality of changing the venue 1 week from the day and all the already sold tickets.


Could you imagine a port v Adelaide grand final....IN ADELAIDE !

We would need to send the army in to keep the peace.
I’d be there just for the awesomeness of it.
 

harrythetiger

Summited Everest 30/9/17
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Posts
10,071
Likes
25,355
Location
Hillary Step
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76ers
The mcg deal wasnt up for another 20 years

20 years dude - olympics - you know those massive sporting events involving 10s of thousands of athletes right?

The entire world is invited - you may have heard of them?

They build multiple stadiums and olympic villages - the whole kit and kaboodle - billions of dollars spent.




9 years.



I dont think anybody felt like they had to get in 20 years before - AS THATS NOT HOW ANYONE DOES THAT SHIT.

Awarding an event for another 20 years 20 years before the event is due to be renewed isnt good business - it isnt anything but a preemptive strike - it was a dirty little backyard deal done by victorians for victorians - its the purest example possible that this is not a fuxxn national league and it never will be.
Ill ask you again: what was the likelihood of another suitable venue being built in the next 39 years?
 

LoungeLizard

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Posts
7,571
Likes
5,496
Location
gippsland
AFL Club
Collingwood
The mcg deal wasnt up for another 20 years

20 years dude - olympics - you know those massive sporting events involving 10s of thousands of athletes right?

The entire world is invited - you may have heard of them?

They build multiple stadiums and olympic villages - the whole kit and kaboodle - billions of dollars spent.




9 years.



I dont think anybody felt like they had to get in 20 years before - AS THATS NOT HOW ANYONE DOES THAT SHIT.

Awarding an event for another 20 years 20 years before the event is due to be renewed isnt good business - it isnt anything but a preemptive strike - it was a dirty little backyard deal done by victorians for victorians - its the purest example possible that this is not a fuxxn national league and it never will be.
I disagree with what the AFL have done, but you have a habit of calling people stupid.
Look at the bolded bit, then go find out where Gil is from.
 

footyfan78

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Posts
18,171
Likes
17,604
Location
spacetime
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
there are no other teams worthy
My gut feel is the grand final rightly played at sacred home of game forever is about the only good thing to come out of this deal. Very skeptical any benefit I will see at Docklands. Money should have been invested in another ground built in south-east area that could hold at least 60,000. Metro area getting so big, just should have been done with any big vision. Grants for upgrading community football grounds and for women's football I won't knock but dirty on the waste on money on Docklands for what seems cosmetic reasons only.
 

kranky al

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
14,323
Likes
16,857
Location
Greenough
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
east perth www.pixelpac.com.au
I disagree with what the AFL have done, but you have a habit of calling people stupid.
Look at the bolded bit, then go find out where Gil is from.
Gil is just one of the people involved in this deal.

Tell me something - who benefits the most from this deal.
 

LoungeLizard

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Posts
7,571
Likes
5,496
Location
gippsland
AFL Club
Collingwood
Gil is just one of the people involved in this deal.

Tell me something - who benefits the most from this deal.
You said a deal done by "Victorians" well Gil is not a Victorian is he?

We all know you hate on Victorians, but we all also know you are not really that good with your facts.
 

harrythetiger

Summited Everest 30/9/17
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Posts
10,071
Likes
25,355
Location
Hillary Step
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76ers
seeing as the two ovals just build are designed to be expandable id say incredibly high
Good old "expandable" stadium back at it again. If it was so easy to expand, the WA government should have been making a deal with the AFL, like the Victorian government did.
 

kranky al

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
14,323
Likes
16,857
Location
Greenough
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
east perth www.pixelpac.com.au
Good old "expandable" stadium back at it again. If it was so easy to expand, the WA government should have been making a deal with the AFL, like the Victorian government did.
20 years out.

The first phase of the stadium had just been built

Olympics are awarded 9 years out

What part of this is hard to understand

Heres another example for you

Soccer is currently bidding for the 2026 world cup.

9 years out again.


Are they holding secret negotiations with one prospective bidder?

Nope


As they want the maximum amount of money for soccer
 

LoungeLizard

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Posts
7,571
Likes
5,496
Location
gippsland
AFL Club
Collingwood
20 years out.

The first phase of the stadium had just been built

Olympics are awarded 9 years out

What part of this is hard to understand

Heres another example for you

Soccer is currently bidding for the 2026 world cup.

9 years out again.


Are they holding secret negotiations with one prospective bidder?

Nope


As they want the maximum amount of money for soccer
How sure are you about this?
 
Top Bottom