Remove this Banner Ad

Mitch Clark - The Second Attempt

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't understand why Freo fans are getting so angry.

They don't even need him. :rolleyes:

I don't quite understand the apparent sense of entitlement coming from some: "He only wants to come to [strike]WA[/strike] Freo therefore we shouldn't have to pay close to market value for him."

IIRC they weren't overly thrilled with the Tarrant situation. Some seem to expect that it is poor form not to follow Freo's lead (and IIRC they tried their best to get more out of that situation anyway).
 
Would be nice to hear from Bondy, to be honest. Kerr has been saying his bit, I'd like to hear what's happening from our side. Peeargh in half an hour might have something, hopefully.
 
Also the argument that you won't play him in the ruck is void. You are still trading for a very good ruckman forward it does not matter where you intend to play him, just what he is capable of.

Exactly. A car dealership isn't going to give me a hefty discount on an all terrain vehicle because I only want to drive it on sealed roads.
 
The anger towards Freo Supporters is well justified when proposals such as this are put forward:
1) PSD
2) Second Round Pick
3) Compo Pick

Not one Freo Supporter has put up a decent deal that I have seen,

Also the argument that you won't play him in the ruck is void. You are still trading for a very good ruckman forward it does not matter where you intend to play him, just what he is capable of. Chris Judd is not worth a second round pick if you are intending to trade him to play as a FF, you are still trading for Chris Judd the midfielder.

Grow a Brain Freo Supporters - if your club is offering big money to a player it is clear they rate him highly, hence he is worth more than a second round pick

Likewise, I haven't seen a decent deal put up by a Brisbane supporter. That's because your good deal is shit for us, and our good deal is shit for you.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Seriously. Enough of the Fremantle posters v Brisbane posters crap. Brisbane fans think Fremantle posters are being unreasonable? And Fremantle fans think the same about Brisbane posters? Who'd have thought that.

Go back to your team boards if you want to bitch about the other team. Leave this thread about actual Clark trade news.
 
Likewise, I haven't seen a decent deal put up by a Brisbane supporter. That's because your good deal is shit for us, and our good deal is shit for you.

I do agree with you 100%, but would Freo supporters class this as fair?

Clark and 34/30 for 16 and Mayne

I would say this is fair but what do you guys think. I'm over the arguing.
 
Seriously. Enough of the Fremantle posters v Brisbane posters crap. Brisbane fans think Fremantle posters are being unreasonable? And Fremantle fans think the same about Brisbane posters? Who'd have thought that.

Go back to your team boards if you want to bitch about the other team. Leave this thread about actual Clark trade news.

So are we just posting news now? Or are will still discussing?
 
Exactly. A car dealership isn't going to give me a hefty discount on an all terrain vehicle because I only want to drive it on sealed roads.

That would also apply to your argument on the Freo boards about having no use for a 2nd round pick (which for the record, I agree would be a silly offer).

Can't pick and chose to use that logic where it suits you.
 
I do agree with you 100%, but would Freo supporters class this as fair?

Clark and 34/30 for 16 and Mayne

I would say this is fair but what do you guys think. I'm over the arguing.

I'd do that deal simply to move on, tbh. I'd much rather we keep Mayne, but if it's gets the job done then let's do it. I'll ring Bondy, you ring Kerry.
 
So are we just posting news now? Or are will still discussing?

Depends what your definition of discussion is. If it's calling posters from the other teams 'idiots' or 'delusional', or telling them 'to grow a brain' then I would suggest you not bother posting here.

If it's a genuine discussion over possible deals, then go for it.
 
Dunno what everyones crying about, did people really expect Bond to put up his best offer first thing Monday morning? I get the feeling Freo arent all that fussed whether they get Clark or not, and theres nothing wrong with throwing up a few ordinary offers, you have to start somewhere.

If Freo really want him, they will get him, but Bond knows he's not as good as what Brisbane are making him out to be. He's had one good year and about 5 lazy half hearted years.

Good on Bond for making a stance, and for Brisbane likewise. Both clubs are only trying to get the best for themselves, but we have to remember Brisbane HAVE to off load him to someone regardless, otherwise he leaves for nothing.

Thats my say, over and out.
 
Dunno what everyones crying about, did people really expect Bond to put up his best offer first thing Monday morning? I get the feeling Freo arent all that fussed whether they get Clark or not, and theres nothing wrong with throwing up a few ordinary offers, you have to start somewhere.

If Freo really want him, they will get him, but Bond knows he's not as good as what Brisbane are making him out to be. He's had one good year and about 5 lazy half hearted years.

Good on Bond for making a stance, and for Brisbane likewise. Both clubs are only trying to get the best for themselves, but we have to remember Brisbane HAVE to off load him to someone regardless, otherwise he leaves for nothing.

Thats my say, over and out.

+1:thumbsu:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dunno what everyones crying about, did people really expect Bond to put up his best offer first thing Monday morning? I get the feeling Freo arent all that fussed whether they get Clark or not, and theres nothing wrong with throwing up a few ordinary offers, you have to start somewhere.

If Freo really want him, they will get him, but Bond knows he's not as good as what Brisbane are making him out to be. He's had one good year and about 5 lazy half hearted years.

Good on Bond for making a stance, and for Brisbane likewise. Both clubs are only trying to get the best for themselves, but we have to remember Brisbane HAVE to off load him to someone regardless, otherwise he leaves for nothing.

Thats my say, over and out.

This is the most sensible thing I have read in 4387 pages of largely:

You're stupid
nah, you're stupid
nah you are
nah you are
I said it first
what you say is what you are
etc, etc, etc...

:thumbsu:
 
The anger towards Freo Supporters is well justified when proposals such as this are put forward:
1) PSD
2) Second Round Pick
3) Compo Pick

Not one Freo Supporter has put up a decent deal that I have seen,

Also the argument that you won't play him in the ruck is void. You are still trading for a very good ruckman forward it does not matter where you intend to play him, just what he is capable of. Chris Judd is not worth a second round pick if you are intending to trade him to play as a FF, you are still trading for Chris Judd the midfielder.

Grow a Brain Freo Supporters - if your club is offering big money to a player it is clear they rate him highly, hence he is worth more than a second round pick

As Brisbane fans have quite rightly pointed out time and time again, Kerr is trying to get the best deal he can for his employer. Likewise, Bond is doing the same. Suppose the following scenario is true: Bond is 99% certain that Freo can get Mitch Clark via the PSD. How is he then getting the best deal for his employer by offering up any trade? Now suppose instead that Bond is 99% certain that Mitch Clark will not sign off on a deal with another club, but cannot guarantee that Freo will get him through the PSD. His best option (for his employer) is to offer Brisbane a trade, but one that favours Freo, with supreme confidence that no trade can be done with another team, regardless of how appealing that trade is to Brisbane.

Can you see how there are many scenarios in which the above trade proposals are in fact optimum solutions for Freo, thus if you consider any of these scenarios to be feasible, you must consider these offers to be feasible. It's all very logical.

Now, once you start talking about "value", "worth" and vague terms like that, you're entitled to be angry at the Freo proposals. However, this anger is not justified by any kind of logical argument and it could not be exclusively applied to Fremantle. In fact, the t-shirt that you just bought was made by some lovely ladies working in the Wujiang Jiayunda Textile Factory. To them, that t-shirt is worth $100 -- that is what will adequately compensate them for the effort they put in, allowing them to live a comfortable life: this is what they feel their labour is "worth". In reality, though, they are on a fairly small wage, the fabric was bought off the supplier at a significant discount (let's just say the t-shirt won't last the 2 years you were promised), and there is enough competition to drive down the price. The t-shirt cost you $30. Will you voluntarily pay $100 for the t-shirt, because somebody thinks it's worth that much? If you're pretty confident that $30 will get you the shirt, why pay $100? It's not a matter of Freo offering a "decent deal", but offering the deal that they feel is necessary to get Mitch Clark. Nobody enters any kind of bargaining situation caring about what's "decent", it's simply a mathematical system to be solved: what is achievable.
 
on another note melbourne are actually serious about trading for m.clark however

m.clark's manager is very clever/sneaky and has very quitly told clark if frem cant get the deal done simply enter the preseason draft and put 1/1.2 million on your head for 1 year and then try to force another trade to fremantle in 1 year (teams dont want players who dont want to be there particularly when they would have to pay 1 million + that way he will get a million + each year at GWS until they give in and trade him to freo

if he didnt take GWS money why would he take the dees money (melb have to pay someone monster money to even reach 92.5% of the cap)

however IMO the deal to fremantle will be done

i think 16 and 20 for m.clark is what bris will agree to (problem is frem or lyon will do that but will want another pick back from either 29 or 30 or 34 as well as 52

16 and 20 for m.clark and pick 34 and 52 is my prediction

GUYS WHAT is your trade prediction on m.clark?
 
^^^^
Firstly, any price Mitch Clark puts on his head via the drafts must be for a minimum of 2 years, not 1 or his other options is to sit out of football for 23 months if another club other than his preferred one takes him via that route.

As for what the trade will be, who knows but I'm confident enough to say Clark will be playing for Freo next season, a deal will be done.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

on another note melbourne are actually serious about trading for m.clark however

m.clark's manager is very clever/sneaky and has very quitly told clark if frem cant get the deal done simply enter the preseason draft and put 1/1.2 million on your head for 1 year and then try to force another trade to fremantle in 1 year (teams dont want players who dont want to be there particularly when they would have to pay 1 million + that way he will get a million + each year at GWS until they give in and trade him to freo

if he didnt take GWS money why would he take the dees money (melb have to pay someone monster money to even reach 92.5% of the cap)

however IMO the deal to fremantle will be done

i think 16 and 20 for m.clark is what bris will agree to (problem is frem or lyon will do that but will want another pick back from either 29 or 30 or 34 as well as 52

16 and 20 for m.clark and pick 34 and 52 is my prediction

GUYS WHAT is your trade prediction on m.clark?

Clark and pick 34 to freo for Picks 16 and 20. Otherwise I am tipping 16 and a player like Mayne. Worst case scenario is that if he goes into the PSD and gets passed on by GWS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top