- Jul 19, 2010
- 29,361
- 84,280
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What happened with that?
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Opinion New AFC HQ: We're on like Donkey Kong!
- Thread starter Elite Crow
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
What happened with that?
Swept under the tarp.
MatthewB
If the drinking lamp is lit, you should be too
- Sep 17, 2015
- 10,907
- 13,894
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NY Yankees, Glenelg Adelaide Giants
if only there was another plan so the taxpayers didn't have to pay so much money towards it
- Sep 30, 2014
- 18,956
- 40,138
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Sounds like it’s going to take up more parklands space as well. So all the bits they didn’t like about our proposal but none of the good bits.
if only there was another plan so the taxpayers didn't have to pay so much money towards it
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 85,788
- 179,142
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #4,480
Oh gosh. You know, I'm not much on speeches, but it's so gratifying to... leave you wallowing in the mess you've made. You're screwed, thank you, bye.
Was that Homer the Garbo episode?
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 85,788
- 179,142
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #4,482
Yep. Ray Patterson, Sanitation Commissioner
- Aug 7, 2015
- 11,399
- 18,725
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
You're right, you aint much on speeches
I'm shocked Liberal stooge Alex Hyde who basically runs the council wasn't all over getting private investment to fund it.
Maybe they can put an OTR in it. Derrimut gym?
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
New facility update
Last month, the Club lodged a Registration of Interest for the currently vacant land
Crows progress to second stage of tender process
Read an article today saying our proposal has the lowest $ return out of the 4 progressing due to the Crows facilities taking up land. People seem to believe that'll cause us to get the flick the quickest.
That would be a monumental **** up our end if true.
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,527
- 48,412
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Its in Adelaide Now, Commercial & General and 2 developers from Melbourne.
In terms of lowest return, its says it $25m less profit but thats the return to the developers right? If so that can only impact how much each party are willing to pay and unlike the other parties we have a $15M government grant.
The bids still have to put in their financial offers so as long we accept we will make a lower return but are prepared to pay, which we would have going into this as we are using it for a football club, I can't see why we aren't still in with a chance.
Unless I am reading it wrong.
The article doesnt say about us getting the flick the quickest so are you hearing that elsewhere?
What do you mean, by that?
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
In your opinion.
If we didn't get it?
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
DevNull
Team Captain
I think they would prefer Brompton but I have never seen where they (Silvers and Olson) have intimated we are likely to get Brompton. Unless by club you mean SRowe & KG.
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
Isn't lowest return meaning lowest return to us and our developers....As in the purchaser...not the lowest return to the vendor...? If so, what does that matter?
And just because we would likely get the lowest return, our use is not the same as a commercial development like the others that I also assume would require a certain higher return for their shareholders, whereas the Crows have different benefits from the purchase and development, plus govt money.
Edit: and I assume it would be decided on based on a combination of the purchase price and meeting local community needs etc.
And just because we would likely get the lowest return, our use is not the same as a commercial development like the others that I also assume would require a certain higher return for their shareholders, whereas the Crows have different benefits from the purchase and development, plus govt money.
Edit: and I assume it would be decided on based on a combination of the purchase price and meeting local community needs etc.
- Jun 23, 2016
- 18,338
- 17,781
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
No.
Its in Adelaide Now, Commercial & General and 2 developers from Melbourne.
In terms of lowest return, its says it $25m less profit but thats the return to the developers right? If so that can only impact how much each party are willing to pay and unlike the other parties we have a $15M government grant.
The bids still have to put in their financial offers so as long we accept we will make a lower return but are prepared to pay, which we would have going into this as we are using it for a football club, I can't see why we aren't still in with a chance.
Unless I am reading it wrong.
The article doesnt say about us getting the flick the quickest so are you hearing that elsewhere?
I wouldn't have thought the developers would disclose their financial returns as part of the tender process. Deaneus! will know.
Financial return to government would be only 1 component of the tender assessments.
- Status
