- Aug 24, 2008
- 2,447
- 1,486
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Panther, Arsenal
Leagues cut the video out.
Surly you jest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Leagues cut the video out.
Nup cuts out just before the hit then restarts once play resumes.Surly you jest.
Heard he’s been offered 2 weeks.Captain of Monty laid a hip & shoulder on Pannam of Greensy and knocked him out - He was out for a while and an ambulance was called. Think the game was stopped for around 30 minutes
Monty bloke was only yellow carded I think
The NFNL review all cards and can send to tribunal. 2 weeks is the max that can be offered by umpires.Heard he’s been offered 2 weeks.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
There were plenty at the game and everyone had a different opinion - It was a big hit and contact was made with the head but it wasnt a dog shot. In the AFL it would be 3 or 4 simply because of the injury involved.Heard he’s been offered 2 weeks.
Yeah they’ve done it on occasions. Just save themselves a media storm potetially.There were plenty at the game and everyone had a different opinion - It was a big hit and contact was made with the head but it wasnt a dog shot. In the AFL it would be 3 or 4 simply because of the injury involved.
Why would the NFL remove the footage? Has that been done before?
They have the option to go straight to tribunal? The league removing footage of this incident and jai burns incident is a farce. Both should have been on the sidelines much more than the 2 week “set penalty”The NFNL review all cards and can send to tribunal. 2 weeks is the max that can be offered by umpires.
Its really poor behaviour by the NFNL. The entire tribunal system needs an overhaul. It should be run off the AFL system... High, Careless, Serve impact... Not whatever some old fart thinksThey have the option to go straight to tribunal? The league removing footage of this incident and jai burns incident is a farce. Both should have been on the sidelines much more than the 2 week “set penalty”
CorrectHeard he’s been offered 2 weeks.
This league is becoming a debacle how it is operated and set up with so many inconsistent rulings. Feels like the DVFL days.Correct
Anymore news on the reported Sacking last week at Headquarters?This league is becoming debacle how it is operated and set up with so many inconsistent rulings. Feels like the DVFL days.
Great effort by Panthers to get within 5 goals of the Bergs - Interesting points profile for the game with Eltham 38/46 and Bergs 33/46Agreed, especially debuting three U19s made them very young and inexperienced but I am sure many at Eltham would be happy with the margin considering its probably the lowest one against the Tigers this year and in particularly at around halfway through the third quarter the scores where level.
It isIts really poor behaviour by the NFNL. The entire tribunal system needs an overhaul. It should be run off the AFL system... High, Careless, Serve impact... Not whatever some old fart thinks
Leagues cut the video out.
and I personally think that's half the problem, offering players set penalties of 1-2 weeks post game without reviewing footage of the incident and purely going on gut instinct during the game.It is
The NFNL review every incident given by umpires and can escalate to tribunal if deemed 2 weeks isn’t enough. Just because he took “2 weeks” doesn’t mean he won’t be fronting the tribunal this week.and I personally think that's half the problem, offering players set penalties of 1-2 weeks post game without reviewing footage of the incident and purely going on gut instinct during the game.
Club then challenge a report and the tribunal throws it out backing the umpires version of events, the NFNL have to be seen to backing their own (umpires).
From what I've seen, I'd say 99% of the challenges get thrown out and player cops another week.
AFL review footage before handing penalties down.. NFNL don't.
I think this part of the system needs an overhaul.
It wasn’t left out by accident. It’s not hard to accurately cut footage!From what I have been 'told' the NFNL did NOT cut the footage, the operator did as there was 30 minutes of dead time due to waiting for ambulance and when they cut it they went 10 seconds too far (apparently you see from about 10 seconds before bump and next thing is bloke taking free kick so it sorta makes sense). Take that as you will it's what I have been reliably informed.
Also seen photos of the Boro lads tongue, wow, that's messed up, will be having surgery and a painful annoying recovery the poor lad.
From what I was told Mont dude offered 2 despite him adamant it was a fair bump (but as we know, someone injured and concussed its gunna be a tough fight if he appeals)
No way he had a mouth guard in … if he did, there is a lawsuit coming.It wasn’t left out by accident. It’s not hard to accurately cut footage!
Yes the photo is doing the rounds. Was he wearing a mouth guard I wonder
My mail is if Bundoora stoop to a new low and pull their seconds out they will be some sort of chance as Heidelberg will play a composite team, heard it here.Heidelberg v Bundoora this week. Obviously a tough gig for Bundoora ones but I fear how big the twos hiding could be!
Why would Heidelberg play a composite team? This is such a stupid postMy mail is if Bundoora stoop to a new low and pull their seconds out they will be some sort of chance as Heidelberg will play a composite team, heard it here.
My mail is if Bundoora stoop to a new low and pull their seconds out they will be some sort of chance as Heidelberg will play a composite team, heard it here.
Off to the tribunal now…so will see what the NFNL determine….you can only imagine the injury will be pivotal, which is interesting if player didn’t have a mouth guard. The “accidental” cutting of the incident may mysteriously reappear post tribunal. I am thinking we are going to see an extended holiday from the 2 offered originally to 4 to 6.It wasn’t left out by accident. It’s not hard to accurately cut footage!
Yes the photo is doing the rounds. Was he wearing a mouth guard I wonder
Off to the tribunal now…so will see what the NFNL determine….you can only imagine the injury will be pivotal, which is interesting if player didn’t have a mouth guard. The “accidental” cutting of the incident may mysteriously reappear post tribunal. I am thinking we are going to see an extended holiday from the 2 offered originally to 4 to 6.