yaco55
Hall of Famer
Some of this is going to sound stupid but I am going to say it anyway.
I think that many have been seduced by Stringer's goals and that not enough attention is being paid to the way he actually plays and, what I think is the flow-on effect of his style being, the scoring inefficiency of the Dogs.
In reality if Stringer was the size of the small forward that he is in a structural sense he would not be talked up to the extent that he is. The comparisons, inherent in that stupid poll on the Fox Footy program, with Hogan are ridiculous and have absolutely no account of the way that the Melbourne structure is built around Hogan who brings others into the game with the way that he presents at the ball up on to the wing. Daniher does the same thing for us.
The problem that the Dogs now have is that Stringer is clearly king dick in their forward line but if they are to become efficient he is going to have to become second or third behind Redpath and Boyd (based on what they have available) who will draw the ball and control it in the air.
Spot on as usual with your post - Stringer's year has been average, though reckon he's true position is as a midfielder.



