So where are the ODI records going to finish up? There's no doubt that T20 has had a huge impact on expectations re run-rates. If you cant score at a S/R of 100, don't bother. If you are not capable of ramping it up to hit sixes on demand, don't bother. If you lose early wickets and find yourself in a situation where you need to grind it out, you've probably lost anyway. It's accepted that the boundaries will be tiny (just wait and see this summer in Australia).
The Australian batting line-up should be Warner, Finch, Watson, Bailey, Clarke, Maxwell, Faulkner, Cutting, don't-care-who-keeps-provided-he-can-hit, bowlers. Voges, Hughes - forget it. Next in line - White, Birt, etc. You might as well play White as the spinner - he's not really going to do much worse than a recognized one. Most wickets in ODIs are from slogs, or trying to milk a single from a ball that should be defended.
We've now seen 3 x 200s in ODIs. Hell, Finch scored 150 in a T20 last month. If a team went for it from the get-go and got lucky, 500 is certainly possible. In the famous Aus-vs-SA 438-434 game, the Saffies were 2/280 after 30.
Could an individual score 300?
The Australian batting line-up should be Warner, Finch, Watson, Bailey, Clarke, Maxwell, Faulkner, Cutting, don't-care-who-keeps-provided-he-can-hit, bowlers. Voges, Hughes - forget it. Next in line - White, Birt, etc. You might as well play White as the spinner - he's not really going to do much worse than a recognized one. Most wickets in ODIs are from slogs, or trying to milk a single from a ball that should be defended.
We've now seen 3 x 200s in ODIs. Hell, Finch scored 150 in a T20 last month. If a team went for it from the get-go and got lucky, 500 is certainly possible. In the famous Aus-vs-SA 438-434 game, the Saffies were 2/280 after 30.
Could an individual score 300?




