Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Official 2012 Draft discussion thread: All drafts complete.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can see Neeld going for Wines. Looking back on the players he's favoured pretty much all of them are hard at it work-horses. Tynan, Magner, Clark, Sellar. Look at wines profile, strong bodied, attacks the footy hard, endurance, tackles well. All of these are qualities Neeld has been talking about instilling in our players all year, defensive skills, exactly what we need more of.
 
There's a forgotten man amongst all of this: Rory Taggert should be playing first team footy off a wing next season...so Casey watchers say anyway.
 
There's a forgotten man amongst all of this: Rory Taggert should be playing first team footy off a wing next season...so Casey watchers say anyway.
Big wraps on Taggert. Was all but an inclusion against Sydney in Round 8 then was injured for the rest of the season.

Skilful and tough. Can't wait to see him get a game.
 
There's a forgotten man amongst all of this: Rory Taggert should be playing first team footy off a wing next season...so Casey watchers say anyway.

Yep, love the way Taggert looks, really good skills, can't recall how fast he is, our midfield is pretty damn slow in its current state.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Can I just point out the early retirement of Tom Swift, who's quit WCE to study medicine. Wow. To think that we were disappointed not to take him ahead of Blease or Strauss in the 2008 draft. He went at pick 18 (maybe 20?) after being rated as the best 16yo in the country a few years before. Amazing.
 
Can I just point out the early retirement of Tom Swift, who's quit WCE to study medicine. Wow. To think that we were disappointed not to take him ahead of Blease or Strauss in the 2008 draft. He went at pick 18 (maybe 20?) after being rated as the best 16yo in the country a few years before. Amazing.
Not as if Strauss is so flash himself.
 
I could deal with Grundy because he has size, but only if Viney goes at 27.

Grundy, Wines, Kennedy, Viney.

Would still rather a mid over Grundy.
Yeah I think that's the thing is that from all reports Grundy is pretty much ready to go and will be a good age for a premiership window. If viney slips we could take 2 mids and a future ruck from 3 picks in the top 30 without allowing for pick in the teens.

Don't worry about how many rucks we have now, I can't remember a time when we had a full compliment to pick from anyways. there is generally at least 2 injured all the time. How many of those rucks are good enough to play in a premiership team? Maybe 2 as is.
 
Yeah I think that's the thing is that from all reports Grundy is pretty much ready to go and will be a good age for a premiership window. If viney slips we could take 2 mids and a future ruck from 3 picks in the top 30 without allowing for pick in the teens.

Don't worry about how many rucks we have now, I can't remember a time when we had a full compliment to pick from anyways. there is generally at least 2 injured all the time. How many of those rucks are good enough to play in a premiership team? Maybe 2 as is.
Jamar speaks for himself. Will be #1 for a year or two - but who know when his body will stop yielding.

Martin may be traded, but really should be our CHF and second ruck.

Spencer is your meat and potatoes, 'happy to have a spot on the list', third choice.

Gawn has a huge ceiling, but may not make it at all.

Fitzpatrick will find himself more at home in a forward pocket as a third tall option.

Sellar, when he has a spot, is capable but undersized.

Also, from the player review:

Stefan Martin
This was a disappointing year, with multiple injuries for Stef, and he struggled to make a mark as he has in recent times. Stef has the ability to be a very good player, but injuries didn't allow it this year. We anticipate that he will have a big pre-season to set himself for 2013. - Leigh Brown (forward line coach)
 
Important dates:

October 1 - Commencement of Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency period.

October 5, 2pm - Nomination of Father-Son Eligible Players and Academy Bidding Players.

October 8, 10am - Father Son Eligible Players and Academy Players Bid Meeting.

October 8 - Commencement of Trade Period.

October 19, 2pm - Deadline for GWS Giants to pre-list balance of any uncontracted players under List Establishment rules.

October 19, 5pm - Close to Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.

October 23, 5pm - Trade Incentive Rule (17 year-olds). Deadline for trading.

October 26, 2pm - End of Trade Period.

October 26, 2.10pm - Trade Incentive (17 year-olds) Selection.

October 31, 2pm - List Lodgement One.

November 1 - Commencement to Delisted Player Free Agency Period.

November 13, 2pm - End to Delisted Player Free Agency Period.

November 13, 2pm - Out of Contract Listed Player Draft Nomination deadline, New Player Draft Nomination deadline.

November 13, 2pm - Deadline for Nomination of any use of 2012 GWS Giants Compensation Selections.

November 15, 2pm - List Lodgement Two.

November 16, 2pm - Delisted Player Draft Nomination deadline, Non-Retained Rookies Draft Nomination deadline, Nominated of Queensland Zone Priority Selections and Nomination of NSW/ACT Zone Priority Selections.

November 22 - NAB AFL Draft, Gold Coast Convention Centre.

November 23 - Second Delisted Player Free Agency Period commences.

November 28, 2pm - Out of Contract Listed Players Nomination deadline, International Players Nomination deadline, Players Not Registered / Played Three Years deadline, NSW Scholarship and International Scholarship Players deadline.

November 28, 5pm - Second Delisted Player Free Agency Period ends.

November 29, 2pm - List Lodgement Three.

December 4, 2pm - Delisted Player Nomination deadline.

December 4 - Deadline for GWS Giants to pre-list balance of any previously listed or previously nominated for draft players under List Establishment rules.

December 11, 11am - NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft.

December 11, 11.05am - Brisbane Lions, Gold Coast Suns, GWS Giants and Sydney Swans Eligible Pre-Selected Rookies.

December 11, 11.10am - NAB AFL Rookie Draft.

Got this off the trade board.
 
And so the dominoes start falling. GC trade pick 2 for a mini-draft pick, giving GWS 1 and 2 in the ND. SURELY GWS will take Grundy at 2, they need a high quality ruckman. That leaves Toumpas at 3, and I reckon Wines at 4. Oh and some kid called Viney at 26, I hear he goes alright.

Wines obviously has the Melbourne fan factor, plus good mates with Viney as per the article in The Age on Saturday. Get around him.
 
Not sure if this has been spoken about... only breezed through the 22 pages on the thread...

Talk today about us trading pick 3 for Mini draft pick 2 (effectively Jesse Hogan)

Just wanted to ask the question or pose the thought... Hogan v Stringer

If we kept pick 3 and 4 we use pick 3 on the best available mid, then take Jake Stringer at 4.

Both Hogan and Stringer are 'smaller' KPF (Jack Darling types), both tested well at the combine.

My points are towards taking Stringer, if he is worthy of pick 4.

1. No 'go home' factor; Hogan from WA, Stringer from Bendigo
2. Similar body types and potential; on paper can't lose.
3. Stringer, if fit, is available for selection throughout 2013. Hogan would be at Casey for 12 months. Stringer could be given a better program for development mixing VFL and AFL football.
 
Not sure if this has been spoken about... only breezed through the 22 pages on the thread...

Talk today about us trading pick 3 for Mini draft pick 2 (effectively Jesse Hogan)

Just wanted to ask the question or pose the thought... Hogan v Stringer

If we kept pick 3 and 4 we use pick 3 on the best available mid, then take Jake Stringer at 4.

Both Hogan and Stringer are 'smaller' KPF (Jack Darling types), both tested well at the combine.

My points are towards taking Stringer, if he is worthy of pick 4.

1. No 'go home' factor; Hogan from WA, Stringer from Bendigo
2. Similar body types and potential; on paper can't lose.
3. Stringer, if fit, is available for selection throughout 2013. Hogan would be at Casey for 12 months. Stringer could be given a better program for development mixing VFL and AFL football.
Worthy of pick 13. Not pick 4.

I don't want Hogan. Like, really don't want Hogan. Something about someone his size dominating at under 18 level...doesn't transpose well.
 
Not sure if this has been spoken about... only breezed through the 22 pages on the thread...

Talk today about us trading pick 3 for Mini draft pick 2 (effectively Jesse Hogan)

Just wanted to ask the question or pose the thought... Hogan v Stringer

If we kept pick 3 and 4 we use pick 3 on the best available mid, then take Jake Stringer at 4.

Both Hogan and Stringer are 'smaller' KPF (Jack Darling types), both tested well at the combine.

My points are towards taking Stringer, if he is worthy of pick 4.

1. No 'go home' factor; Hogan from WA, Stringer from Bendigo
2. Similar body types and potential; on paper can't lose.
3. Stringer, if fit, is available for selection throughout 2013. Hogan would be at Casey for 12 months. Stringer could be given a better program for development mixing VFL and AFL football.

Hogan's 193 cms but he's still only 17, so he could potentially be 195 cms+ by the time he's ready to play seniors in 2014. Stringer's only 191 cms, and from what I gather long term he'll play as midfield/utility Goddard type player. Hogan is a genuine KPF in the mould of a Jonathon Brown, with elite endurance and speed off the mark. I wouldn't worry about the 'go home' factor...We've got a really good coaching group and a promising list...i'd back us to retain whoever we pick.

I think pick #3 for Hogan and pick #4 for Wines, Toumpas or O'Rourke would be the way to go.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Worthy of pick 13. Not pick 4.

I don't want Hogan. Like, really don't want Hogan. Something about someone his size dominating at under 18 level...doesn't transpose well.

I don't want Hogan also. Stringer might not make it to 13, that's why I asked.

Preferred 3 and 4 picks would be mids anyway, e.g. Wines, Toumpas, O'Rouke etc.
 
I wouldn't worry about the 'go home' factor.

IMO these days it'd be a concern for most clubs, whether it a small concern or not.
I think we've only been bitten by the 'go home' factor once (Scott Thompson); most players leave the Dees because they don't get the opportunity they want and/or deserve... or they're arrogant pricks whose ego makes them believe their ability precedes the club (e.g. Moloney, C. Johnson and McLean) ;)
 
Worthy of pick 13. Not pick 4.

I don't want Hogan. Like, really don't want Hogan. Something about someone his size dominating at under 18 level...doesn't transpose well.
We've seen the lights before, and we're seeing them again.
 
IMO these days it'd be a concern for most clubs, whether it a small concern or not.
I think we've only been bitten by the 'go home' factor once (Scott Thompson); most players leave the Dees because they don't get the opportunity they want and/or deserve... or they're arrogant pricks who think their ego makes them believe their ability precedes the club (e.g. Moloney, C. Johnson and McLean) ;)

True, but I think we're in a much better position to deal with those sort of issues now. As for those three, I think it was more a case that they saw the writing on the wall. Do people from Perth who move to Melbourne really get homesick?
 
There's a forgotten man amongst all of this: Rory Taggert should be playing first team footy off a wing next season...so Casey watchers say anyway.
This guy is the forgotten link.. Seen enough to know where he stands, and it is certainly in our best 22..He will be a very good footballer and will surprise many!!
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Not sure if this has been spoken about... only breezed through the 22 pages on the thread...

Talk today about us trading pick 3 for Mini draft pick 2 (effectively Jesse Hogan)

Just wanted to ask the question or pose the thought... Hogan v Stringer

If we kept pick 3 and 4 we use pick 3 on the best available mid, then take Jake Stringer at 4.

Both Hogan and Stringer are 'smaller' KPF (Jack Darling types), both tested well at the combine.

My points are towards taking Stringer, if he is worthy of pick 4.

1. No 'go home' factor; Hogan from WA, Stringer from Bendigo
2. Similar body types and potential; on paper can't lose.
3. Stringer, if fit, is available for selection throughout 2013. Hogan would be at Casey for 12 months. Stringer could be given a better program for development mixing VFL and AFL football.
Pretty positive Hogan is a big dees fan so that should counter the go home factor..
 
Worthy of pick 13. Not pick 4.

I don't want Hogan. Like, really don't want Hogan. Something about someone his size dominating at under 18 level...doesn't transpose well.

Yep, I hate how players like Brown, Pavlich, Cloke, Darling and Hawkins have turned out.

Can you offer a good explanation for not wanting Hogan?

He's got everything you want in a KPP - he's strong, aggressive and an impressive athlete (agility/speed/etc).

His endurance is up there with the best in THIS draft (as a 17 year old).

Like Darling he'll shed a fair bit of weight upon entry to the AFL system - it's not like he's a ripped machine at the moment, the beauty for us is that he has a year to develop at Casey.... I'd back him to enter 2014 as the most ready to go KPF prospect in years.

His set shot needs work, but the main problem is that he doesn't have a routine - and regardless he's still kicked bags of goals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top