Which one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Dice Man said:Oh well, we may as well put some statistical evidence into this one.
Season 2005.
In 2005, Ottens averaged 11.27 disposals a game, Simmonds averaged 13.23
Ottens had 172 hitouts at an average of 11.45 per game
Simmonds had 304 hitouts at an average of 13.81 per game.
Ottens took 69 marks at an average of 4.6 per game
Simmonds took 123 marks at an average of 5.6 per game
Ottens $450,000 per year
Simmonds $200,000 per year
The Dice Man said:Oh well, we may as well put some statistical evidence into this one.
Season 2005.
Ottens averaged 11.27 disposals a game,
Simmonds averaged 13.23 disposals a game.
Ottens had 172 hitouts at an average of 11.45 per game
Simmonds had 304 hitouts at an average of 13.81 per game.
Ottens took 69 marks at an average of 4.6 per game
Simmonds took 123 marks at an average of 5.6 per game
Ottens $450,000 per year
Simmonds $200,000 per year
tigerboyz said:I heard he was making more like 500k a year for his insipid performances dice.
carn_the_cattas said:From a biased view Ottens
From an unbiased view: Ottens
Ottens has the ability to dominate games.
![]()

Atleast he has potential, unlike another name mentioned in the title of this thread.The Dice Man said:When was the last time he dominated a game, or are you saying he has the potential to dominate games![]()
carn_the_cattas said:Ottens was injured for a majourity of the year. Match fitness lowers his stats.
carn_the_cattas said:Atleast he has potential, unlike another name mentioned in the title of this thread.

No, he didn't have as much time on the ground due to lack fitness caused by injury. You can expect him to play his best when injured.TigerFan said:so instead of playing poorly, he wasn't playing at all most of the time?
carn_the_cattas said:Atleast he has potential, unlike another name mentioned in the title of this thread.

carn_the_cattas said:No, he didn't have as much time on the ground due to lack fitness caused by injury. You can expect him to play his best when injured.
The Dice Man said:When was the last time he dominated a game, or are you saying he has the potential to dominate games![]()
LifeSpan-Void said:well he WAS the reason why we beat Port at AAMI stadium. Broke the interstate hoodoo. Maybe not dominated per se, but if he wasn't playing for us we were gone that night.
LifeSpan-Void said:well he WAS the reason why we beat Port at AAMI stadium. Broke the interstate hoodoo. Maybe not dominated per se, but if he wasn't playing for us we were gone that night.


carn_the_cattas said:Ottens was injured for a majourity of the year. Match fitness lowers his stats.
so does a lack of heart

So Simmonds actually cost you Pavlich?Bentleigh said:Ottens, though about even in my book.
One costs Danny Meyer & Adam Pattison.
One cost Aaron Fiora.
![]()
Ouch!The Dice Man said:Was there another game where he had a shot on, or near the siren that you needed to win but he missed? Im thinking it was at Kardinia Park..against Melbourne maybe?
cypher said:So Simmonds actually cost you Pavlich?Ouch!