Our second round pick

[The Leafs]

Will be happy to trade it for Henderson.

 

[THATSGOLD]

did he just say marley couldn't defend one on one.... WTF

Compared to Shaw in the air..::::: wtf!!!

 

[THATSGOLD]

What do you like about Collingwood?

Right now what do you like about Collingwood?

 

[RuFiO]

Right now what do you like about Collingwood?

Bucks in the media.

 

[SwanBet]

I really want Henderson, but realistically it won't happen.

What i could see happening is; Shaw + 27 for Bugg and Adams.

Works out perfectly for us... Bugg takes up a spot on the half back flank, and adams slot straight into our star studded midfield group.

FYI from Collingwood's small defenders/occasional wing types i rate them in this order.

1. A.Toovey
2. M.Williams
3. C.Young
4. P.Seedsman
5. B.Sinclair

IMO Bugg is currently ahead of the Seed and Sinclair, and with dasher's injury history and toovey recovering from a serious injury, it would be a shrewd bit of business.

 

[sr36]

That was the early story but apparently its a swap of third round picks.

This seems unlikely. Adams would asumedly have slightly more value, thus our 2nd for their 3rd was the initial rumour and seems spot on to me.

 

[sr36]

I really want Henderson, but realistically it won't happen.

What i could see happening is; Shaw + 27 for Bugg and Adams.

Works out perfectly for us... Bugg takes up a spot on the half back flank, and adams slot straight into our star studded midfield group.

FYI from Collingwood's small defenders/occasional wing types i rate them in this order.

1. A.Toovey
2. M.Williams
3. C.Young
4. P.Seedsman
5. B.Sinclair

IMO Bugg is currently ahead of the Seed and Sinclair, and with dasher's injury history and toovey recovering from a serious injury, it would be a shrewd bit of business.

I like it, but am hoping that Seedsman can elevate himself up to Marley and Toovey's level, albeit a more offensive/damaging less defensive version.

 

[Baltimore Jack]

The club has already come out and said they don't rate this draft

Really? Can you quote anyone from the Club?

 

[the mighty T]

Bugg and Adams would be superb.

Pick 10, 11, white, Adams and bug.. With possibly one more trade to come would be an insane result for us

 

[jonbe54]

What do you like about Collingwood?

did he just say marley couldn't defend one on one.... WTF

The better the trading gets year in, year out the more strident and nonsensical the acolytes become

 

[Reykjavik]

Yes our defense is now a rabble without Shaw. Toovey will struggle early. Seedsman and Marley are too light to defend one on one.

I enjoy performance art too.

 

[THATSGOLD]

Bucks in the media.

Is that it?

 

[RuFiO]

The better the trading gets year in, year out the more strident and nonsensical the acolytes become

Sometimes I remotely agree with what Thatsgold says sometimes.
But the Marley quote and us not going overseas and losing an edge kinda baffles me.

 

[RuFiO]

Is that it?

Oh and Grundy!
But that's a given.

 

[Frankie23]

Have they actually said this? I've seen it referred to on here quite often but I have not seen anything from any club to that effect.

Baltimore Jack

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2013-09-30/hine-qa-player-movement

At the moment we hold pick 10 and again with the draft itself I don’t think that it has a lot of depth.

I think we’ve got an eye on to 2015, which really is a strong draft and has great depth in it so at this point in time we’ll probably run with 38 players on our primary list. If something pops up late in the draft that does take our fancy then we’ll certainly have to scope in a TTP (Total Player Payment) sense to bring a player in. But at this point in time, we’ll probably run with 38 players due to our planning for 2015.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2013-09-30/hine-qa-player-movement

the article is a good read, outlines the direction we are heading in...

 

[jonbe54]

Sometimes I remotely agree with what Thatsgold says sometimes.
But the Marley quote and us not going overseas and losing an edge kinda baffles me.

Grasping at straws - an acolyte doesn't have to make sense, just a lot of noise

 

[GoPies1972]

Trade 27 for Docherty, just to really piss off the Blewboys.

Sounds good to me. Anything to upset the scum, or at least push for it and hopefully they would have to up their offer.

 

[jerry springer]

funny how with the draft its always every next year that is the one that runs deep

every year I hear this

 

[ipswichpies]

Sometimes I remotely agree with what Thatsgold says sometimes.
But the Marley quote and us not going overseas and losing an edge kinda baffles me.

I think he sometimes forgets to take his medication and I know exactly what you mean,when you say some of the things he says you find yourself agreeing with and then thats gold says something else and you think WTF.

As I say I think it is because sometimes he forgets to take his pills.

 

[MarkT2]

Baltimore Jack

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2013-09-30/hine-qa-player-movement

At the moment we hold pick 10 and again with the draft itself I don’t think that it has a lot of depth.

I think we’ve got an eye on to 2015, which really is a strong draft and has great depth in it so at this point in time we’ll probably run with 38 players on our primary list. If something pops up late in the draft that does take our fancy then we’ll certainly have to scope in a TTP (Total Player Payment) sense to bring a player in. But at this point in time, we’ll probably run with 38 players due to our planning for 2015.

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2013-09-30/hine-qa-player-movement

the article is a good read, outlines the direction we are heading in...

Thanks for that.

 

[soreplums]

This seems unlikely. Adams would asumedly have slightly more value, thus our 2nd for their 3rd was the initial rumour and seems spot on to me.

Shaw, 27 and our third for Adams, bugg and their fourth? Would that be enough for white?

 

[Pendles!]

Looks like its going to be apart of the Adams trade

 

[soreplums]

Is Docherty any good? If we still have it after the Adams/white trade, ill be happy to trade it for him just to piss Carlton off (or force them to up their offer) or take a punt on garlett

 

[doodles98]

Yes our defense is now a rabble without Shaw. Toovey will struggle early. Seedsman and Marley are too light to defend one on one.

Marley is light? and can't defend one on one? did you mean Sinclair perhaps?