I did think the umps looked after Charlie a bit last night but it may be that I'm just indoctrinated to them giving him no love for years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'Perenially', hell no. Not even close.Collingwood board going on about how perennially blessed Dixon is with the umpires. He actually should get a lot more free kicks than he does.
I'm not too sure what game some people were watching, the wobblers left so much open real estate on the wings and through the midfield in the 2nd term, and the first half of the 3rd, that an STA bus driver would have had the time and space to park his bus and get out to receive a handball from any number of Power players running past.
Regardless of their close losses this season that was the weakest wobblewood team to run on the park for years, they lost their major playmaker before qtr time yet still got the margin to single digits during the 2nd half.
That should have been a 50 plus Port win, but yet again our players switched off when they should have gone in for the kill!
I did think the umps looked after Charlie a bit last night but it may be that I'm just indoctrinated to them giving him no love for years.
Umpiring was always going to be the excuse after former Prot player David Rodan made the correct decision to review a goal line decision early in the game.Watching the replay of that contentious ‘push’ by Dixon on Roughead and two things stand out. Dixon’s hands make contact under Roughheads arm, so the push is in the side. Secondly, it looks to me like Roughead exaggerated the contact.
If this is what sets Collingwood fans of about umpiring, god help them if they ever experience the standard that we regularly cop.
The only reason I can see them have Jonas take the kick outs is because when we inevitably turn it over it leaves him as our last line of defence rather than up the field. Feels like a bit of a negative mindset to me.When you consider we have McKenzie, Burton and to a lesser extent Houston all in the backline with beautiful kicks, Jonas should never be anywhere near a kickout. I did like the Cannon going up the middle a few times, I imagine when guys like Duursma, Rozee and Butters are back to match fitness and can swarm after those bombs into the centre we'll see a few more of them pay off.
The first one where he sprayed the kick from 20m out should probably be called a push. 2 hands in the back, light force but enough that if they paid it no one would complain. The second one clearly in the side, and until they make push in the side a rule, it’s not a free kick to be stronger than your opponent. They would have to pay 20 extra free kicks a game if they paid that one.This commentators whining over Dixon giving Roughead a little push after he was already in the air and missing the ball anyway were ridiculous, especially when you consider Hawkins that gives defenders the hard, two handed shove in the middle of the back at every contest he's involved in.
The first one where he sprayed the kick from 20m out should probably be called a push. 2 hands in the back, light force but enough that if they paid it no one would complain. The second one clearly in the side, and until they make push in the side a rule, it’s not a free kick to be stronger than your opponent. They would have to pay 20 extra free kicks a game if they paid that one.
Imagine Collingwood copping a 38-15 like the one we endured against North Melbourne, or the 2015 reaming at the MCG against Carlton. The bigfooty server would be down for days.Watching the replay of that contentious ‘push’ by Dixon on Roughead and two things stand out. Dixon’s hands make contact under Roughheads arm, so the push is in the side. Secondly, it looks to me like Roughead exaggerated the contact.
If this is what sets Collingwood fans of about umpiring, god help them if they ever experience the standard that we regularly cop.
Yep. 30 was Semaphore, 30D was Largs and 31 was Osborne.STA. Lol. What was the bus that went down Port Road? The 30, 31, 30D from memory.
My favourite moment was when our mole-in-the-goals D-Rod called Jamie Elliott's set shot touched and dared the ARC to prove him wrong.
Liked for the STA reference, disappointed no our defense was slower then a Red Hen joke.that an STA bus driver would have had the time and space to park his bus and get out to receive a handball from any number of Power players running past.
Yep. 30 was Semaphore, 30D was Largs and 31 was Osborne.
Given his username, I'm disappointed 1954 didn't go with MTT instead of STA.
In front of goal?: Not likely to be leading the Coleman. 50m out or on a boundary: perhaps.Its about time. If he got the free kicks in front of goal that he deserved he’d be leading the Coleman right now.
Maybe you just don’t understand the game plan? Try asking a Hinkley lover to explain it for you.Watched the Kayo Mini. The way we score goals is at odds with most of our forward 50 entries.
Blew an opportunity to increase the percentage. I’ve got a feeling percentage is going to be an important factor deciding the ladder placement.