Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Port Forum General AFL Thread Part 28

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
McClelland trophy should be limited to the Mens comp and the prize for winning it should be like that $1Mill.

We don't put anywhere near the value we should on a first place finish. It's not as great at proving you can beat everyone on the biggest stage of finals, but it is a massive achievement in its own right and our 4x1st places finishes should be held in higher regard.

The prizemoney for winning the flag also needs a huge boost.

$1,200,000 for the flag winning club in 2024 is laughable.

Should be $10,000,000 at absolute minimum.
 
McClelland trophy should be limited to the Mens comp and the prize for winning it should be like that $1Mill.

We don't put anywhere near the value we should on a first place finish. It's not as great at proving you can beat everyone on the biggest stage of finals, but it is a massive achievement in its own right and our 4x1st places finishes should be held in higher regard.
I'd be fine with having a separate award for the minor premiership in each. **** give it $500k to each if they really want. At least that would go to two sides that have achieved something (the best regular season).

The idea that you can sum the two together using creative accounting by making 11 AFLW games each equal to exactly double each of the 23 men's games is the sort of insanely stupid thing that could only be thought up in a bush league run by morons.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

To be expected with someone called Tugwell involved. But probably be over pretty quickly.

All jerking aside, I can't see how they'll have a lot to discuss after the Crows' inevitable bid on a F/S or Academy player and nabbing Sid the Curtain Maker with their first pick.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The prizemoney for winning the flag also needs a huge boost.

$1,200,000 for the flag winning club in 2024 is laughable.

Should be $10,000,000 at absolute minimum.
Half that is for the club, half for the players, and outside the salary cap.

This is what the NFL pay - to the players. Given a team has a roster of 53 players in 2024 that was potentially $8.692 mil and in 2025 $9.063 mil, just for the Super Bowl win.


Disney World is swell and those rings are the height of athletic bling, but for NFL athletes, the Super Bowl is also about a nice pay bonus.

Sure, the glory is the big draw, and having the Vince Lombardi Trophy greet you every day when you come in next season is nearly as nice. But every player that took the field in Super Bowl LVIII will be rewarded financially by the league. The amount per player will depend on a variety of factors, though.

How much will the winners of the Super Bowl LVIII get paid?

The latest collective bargaining agreement between the NFL Players Association and the NFL dictates that each member of the winning team will receive $164,000, a $7,000 bump over last year’s total. Winners of the 2025 Super Bowl will receive $171,000.

How much will the losers of the Super Bowl LVIII get paid?

Losing stinks—and the what-ifs and could-have-beens in the postseason can be agonizing. But the $89,000 losing players receive might make that a little easier to deal with. Next year’s losing team will see payments of $96,000 per player.

Does every player get paid the same amount?

No. It all comes down to their length of time in the league and their roster status. Some players could receive only half of the amounts above. Here’s how it breaks down.

Players get a full bonus if…

  • They’ve played at least three previous games during the regular season or playoffs and are on the team’s active or inactive list when the Super Bowl is played.
  • They’ve played at least eight previous games (regular or postseason), regardless of whether they’re on the active/inactive list or not.
  • They’re a veteran player who was injured during the regular season, but are still under contract.
Players get 50% of the bonus if…
  • They’ve played fewer than three previous games during the regular season or playoffs and are on the team’s active or inactive list when the Super Bowl is played.
  • They’re not on the active/inactive list, but played between three and seven games during the regular season or playoffs.
  • They’re a first-year player who was injured during the regular season, but are still under contract.

The following article gives a more comprehensive breakdown of how much players get paid for each play off game, both winning and losing teams, and it confirms the monies come from the NFL not the individual teams.

So like in the AFL these finals payments are outside the cap. However AFL clubs pay each player match payments, not the AFL, during finals. If the player(s) have fixed contracts then they get paid the minimum senior match fee that apply to players after their first two years automatic contract post being drafted. The bonuses for where you finish in the finals are split 50% club and 50% players and these bonuses over and above match payments are also outside the cap.


Players are paid much differently in the playoffs than during the regular season. A majority of players take a sizable pay cut in the playoffs because their salaries have no bearing on what they make during the postseason. Playoff money comes from a league pool instead of from NFL teams. There is a specific amount for each playoff round where each eligible player gets paid the same.

Can't find how much the team owners get paid for winning the Super Bowl, but looks like its some sort of % of this League Pool mentioned above, as the only thing I found was;


According to Equity Atlas, a Super Bowl-winning owner can expect to earn about $30 million from the NFL. Furthermore, winning the Super Bowl is known to boost a franchise's overall value significantly.
 
Breaking - The AFL is making inquiries into Chris Scott’s new role with Morris Finance and the implications on Geelong’s soft cap.
 
Breaking - The AFL is making inquiries into Chris Scott’s new role with Morris Finance and the implications on Geelong’s soft cap.
After the fact lol.

Either this crossed their desk and they allowed it, or their governance process is a shambles. Likely both.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

After the fact lol.

Either this crossed their desk and they allowed it, or their governance process is a shambles. Likely both.
Scott addressed the arrangement with 7NEWS last week when Cleary directly asked the 48-year-old what would he say to people who suggested it was a way to save money in the AFL’s soft cap.
....
Scott said the arrangement had been ticked off between the management, the club and the AFL.

“You obviously wouldn’t go into something unless you were crystal clear on how it was all supposed to work.”
 
Scott addressed the arrangement with 7NEWS last week when Cleary directly asked the 48-year-old what would he say to people who suggested it was a way to save money in the AFL’s soft cap.
....
Scott said the arrangement had been ticked off between the management, the club and the AFL.

“You obviously wouldn’t go into something unless you were crystal clear on how it was all supposed to work.”
Both it is!
 
Chris Scott said in an interview the AFL had signed off on it. Do they not know what they are doing or is he just assuming that they agreed because it's Geelong?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top