Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
agree masten - he has not change just works harder, but not what we need to go forward. B grade skills as well.Negatives:
Masten needs to go, should of been sub and is scared of a contest.
Positives:
Sheppard
Negatives:
- People can crap on all they want about Priddis' improvement, his Brownlow, and how the 'haters' were all wrong like they've been doing all year, but at the core, the fundamental issue with him has always been that for a guy that spends all his time in the middle, is our focal point there and doesn't have the flexibility to play anywhere else, he's never ever been able to match it with the best midfielders in the game, and today was once again proof of that, he's never been able to match it with the best when it's mattered, and he never will. Absolutely terrible performance. Poor skills, poor decision making, and his inside work was non-effective and easily defended.
- Our midfield outside of Gaff and Shuey (made a couple critical errors, but tried to make things happen and got his hands on the ball early) was very poor. Hutchings, Masten, Sheed, the aforementioned Priddis, and the other rotations were simply way too poor. Terrible decision making under pressure, were smashed at the contest, and weren't clean enough.
- The midfield didn't give Kennedy a chance. I've seen some harsh criticism of JK today, but it's not his fault. Our midfield absolutely killed any chance he had. Slow, unclean ball movement or quick high bombs to an outnumbered contest. Our midfield should be ashamed with the delivery they gave him today.
- I've seen criticism of Simpson's game plan but that is way, way off base. Any game plan would have gone to pieces today if the teams midfield were getting smashed at the contest, were turning the ball over and making bad decisions constantly. The back line did the best it could, but they weren't helped in the slightest by our mids.
- Midfield, midfield, midfield. It's been the bane of our existence since 2008. We've got more depth there now, and better quality players, but we still lack class and we still lack composure. Sheed will be better for the run, Yeo will continue to improve and I'm super happy to have Duggan back next year, but we still lack polish and class. Some smart (miraculous) trading might be needed.
- There's too many other poor players to detail all of them. Darling obviously, but he wasn't alone, some really poor efforts from a lot of players today and if you can't execute basic skills, you'll never win a grand final.
- Sinclair has had a good year, but there is still the fundamental issue that his ruck work just isn't that good. We lose so much momentum when he's in the ruck, and he gets dominated way too easy. I hope Lycett's body and form returns next year, he's a better ruckman.
Positives:
- Sheppard. Goddamn, I love you. Great game, and easily our best player on the day. The only one that even remotely looked composed.
- Gaff. Our best midfielder on the day. Worked his butt off, and his disposal and decision making was generally pretty good.
- I thought Gov was pretty good too.
- That's about it. I'm extremely proud of how we've performed this year, and making the grand final was a huge achievement that shouldn't be overlooked, but there's still core, fundamental issues with our team that need to be fixed.
So what did you notice about Priddis that was different to games all through the year placebo?Negatives:
- People can crap on all they want about Priddis' improvement, his Brownlow, and how the 'haters' were all wrong like they've been doing all year, but at the core, the fundamental issue with him has always been that for a guy that spends all his time in the middle, is our focal point there and doesn't have the flexibility to play anywhere else, he's never ever been able to match it with the best midfielders in the game, and today was once again proof of that, he's never been able to match it with the best when it's mattered, and he never will. Absolutely terrible performance. Poor skills, poor decision making, and his inside work was non-effective and easily defended..
Gee bit harsh on Kennedy, yes he was bad but the way the midfield was playing was no suprise, there was not one decent pass to JK inside 50NEGATIVES:
*NO home ground advantage. Will always be a tainted and unfair premiership
*Josh Kennedy. Biggest game of the year and he goes missing. What a surprise. Still a major flat track bully
*Mark Hutchings and all the other spuds lining up. Who the hell thought it was a good idea to let a WAFL standard player into a Grand final?
*Scott Selwood should have been playing
*Having to deal with Fremantle/Richmond/insert flog team supporters in the coming days
POSITIVES:
*Luke Shuey
*We still have better looking supporters than the Hawks do. About 50% percent of the Hawthorn supporters were fat ugly women
*At the start of the year we were lucky to play finals, let alone a Grand Final
*The FULL wings guernsey looked great.
*It was hilarious seeing VFL pets Hawthorn wearing white shorts in the Grand Final
*Could just be a 1991 like aberration for us.
Was a turning point for the better when the club got rid of him (Chick).
Plenty of upside for the Eagles.If they are hungry enough there will be more grand finals for this group.
If we can get as hungry as Chick we might go undefeated
Stupid to think like this. If the Grand Final ever leaves the MCG (and it's a big if) it'll be to a pre determined venue, so getting home ground advantage will only ever be by chance anyway. It's far too big an event to not know the host city until 7 days in advance.NEGATIVES:
*NO home ground advantage. Will always be a tainted and unfair premiership
If you want the actual answer the reason he doesn't take more uncontested marks is because that's not what we want him to do. All of Nick's strengths are in the contest, not just the ruck knock, but the follow up work on the ground, the blocking, tackling, creative handball, little knock-ons etc. Sure, we'd all like him to take more pack marks but he flies against 3 or 4 every time, and probably takes more of these sorts of mark than pretty much anyone else. If he went chasing uncontested cheap kicks and marks his stats may look better, but he'd have far less impact on the game and frankly would be playing to his weakest attribute, which is his kicking.Sorry guys not trying to intrude or anything, but what's with NicNat not getting enough marks. Is it him not pushing hard enough into space to find the ball? I find it hard to believe someone of his athleticism can't find uncontested ball. Absolute freak though.
Bad luck for today, you guys will come back stronger
Thanks mateIf you want the actual answer the reason he doesn't take more uncontested marks is because that's not what we want him to do. All of Nick's strengths are in the contest, not just the ruck knock, but the follow up work on the ground, the blocking, tackling, creative handball, little knock-ons etc. Sure, we'd all like him to take more pack marks but he flies against 3 or 4 every time, and probably takes more of these sorts of mark than pretty much anyone else. If he went chasing uncontested cheap kicks and marks his stats may look better, but he'd have far less impact on the game and frankly would be playing to his weakest attribute, which is his kicking.
This needs to be the first post in every NicNat thread. Those who can't see this don't properly understand football and the role he plays in our team.If he went chasing uncontested cheap kicks and marks his stats may look better, but he'd have far less impact on the game and frankly would be playing to his weakest attribute, which is his kicking.
Sorry to hear that mate, sounds like you've had an awful year and it helps to put how we are all feeling today in perspective.+ve: I stated here a few weeks ago that my wife of 25 years died in June. Since the funeral. the only times I've had any emotions was when thinking about her, or seeing our kids cracking up. Apart from that I've been completely numb. But yesterday I was as emotional and as passionate as ever. There you go. All it took for me to come back to life was my beloved Eagles playing like s**t in a grand final.
Alot of players taking heat, Elliot Yeo worst on ground by a mile , 4 quarters for 5 possessions. Very ordinary.
Darling had a shocker. He tried his guts out no doubt but it was a poor performance. That dropped mark... Man, we had played pretty gash to that point, we finally got some momentum, Hawks came out at HT very flat and the margin would've been 3 goals if he slots that.... But wasn't to be.
Plus it looks like his fingers were strapped, probably a broken one. Smashed quite a few packs anyway.If you want the actual answer the reason he doesn't take more uncontested marks is because that's not what we want him to do. All of Nick's strengths are in the contest, not just the ruck knock, but the follow up work on the ground, the blocking, tackling, creative handball, little knock-ons etc. Sure, we'd all like him to take more pack marks but he flies against 3 or 4 every time, and probably takes more of these sorts of mark than pretty much anyone else. If he went chasing uncontested cheap kicks and marks his stats may look better, but he'd have far less impact on the game and frankly would be playing to his weakest attribute, which is his kicking.
He looked like carry some sort of injury as he seemed to kick poorly in the last few matches and today's warm up.
You know what's funny. The first post ndot made after quarter time in the PF was after the grand final.******* lol
Have you watched this final series? Has been great to date. Today he still took 3 marks inside 50 on a very poor day (no player in the league other than him averages more than 3.1 a game fwiw). If he had shot from each one instead of being unselfish he probably would have ended with a couple of goals. Pretty good for a bad day.
He wasn't good, but your comment is just horribly wrong.