I thought it may have taken weather as a factor in analysing past results. As above, I've never read the thread so I don't even know what data is used.
How is that even possible?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I thought it may have taken weather as a factor in analysing past results. As above, I've never read the thread so I don't even know what data is used.
You've been missing out!!!I thought it may have taken weather as a factor in analysing past results. As above, I've never read the thread so I don't even know what data is used.
How is that even possible?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yep, I'd only be drawing the conclusion that Perth and Queensland are warmer than Melbourne.Here are the Rain / Min / Max temp for each of the Hawks and WC games for the year
View attachment 179320
Games > 20 C max hawks are 1 - 2
View attachment 179321
games above 20C max, wc are 8 - 2 - 1
What does this mean in terms of the grand final? it means Perth is hotter than Melbourne / Launceston.
We need temps/precip at the time of the match!Here are the Rain / Min / Max temp for each of the Hawks and WC games for the year
View attachment 179320
Games > 20 C max hawks are 1 - 2
View attachment 179321
games above 20C max, wc are 8 - 2 - 1
What does this mean in terms of the grand final? it means Perth is hotter than Melbourne / Launceston.
After closer inspection neither team played any matches on a day >20 at any start time earlier than the 4:35pm twilight time slot. The one exception being the 1:10pm Sunday game West Coast played against Brisbane back in round 4 in Brisbane and even then it was only 23 degrees.Here are the Rain / Min / Max temp for each of the Hawks and WC games for the year
View attachment 179320
Games > 20 C max hawks are 1 - 2
View attachment 179321
games above 20C max, wc are 8 - 2 - 1
What does this mean in terms of the grand final? it means Perth is hotter than Melbourne / Launceston.
i know.... but didn't know how to find it.We need temps/precip at the time of the match!
well the theory is that WA / northern teams are used to the more extreme heat than victorian teams.After closer inspection neither team played any matches on a day >20 at any start time earlier than the 4:35pm twilight time slot. The one exception being the 1:10pm Sunday game West Coast played against Brisbane back in round 4 in Brisbane and even then it was only 23 degrees.
This will be the hottest game both teams will have played in all year by far and neither will be "used to it" under actual match conditions.
Sam Mitchell said in an interview earlier in the week (re: how the hot weather will affect the Hawks) that Andrew Russell, the Hawks fitness guru, for the past 4 years from round 18 onwards has had all the players do stuff in a heat room they have at the club to best prepare them for a possible day like this.well the theory is that WA / northern teams are used to the more extreme heat than victorian teams.
you wonder what effect playing twice in perth in the last 2/3 games will have in the hawk in the last on a very hot day for footy.
Interesting that 2008 is so low. Could this indicate that the dominant Geelong side of 2008 wasn't actually "all that" and was merely a big fish (shark if you will) in a small tank? Does doing this same thing with just the grand finalists show anything of interest?![]()
We've been spoiled for good finals teams this year. And we've been spoiled for a while! The last five years have all been better than the previous thirteen.
The worst year is 2003, when Collingwood made the Grand Final with this team. (That thread is what made me curious about the stats). At the end of the home & away season, Brisbane, the best-placed team and eventual premier, was about equivalent to Adelaide this year.
The best year, which only just beats this year, is 2011 -- mostly because of Geelong and Collingwood, but with strong support. Only Essendon of the top 8 weren't much chop.
In 2007, Geelong were great but everyone else really, really sucked. A year later, the Cats were still great, and only Hawthorn and St Kilda were any good.
![]()
We've been spoiled for good finals teams this year. And we've been spoiled for a while! The last five years have all been better than the previous thirteen.
The worst year is 2003, when Collingwood made the Grand Final with this team. (That thread is what made me curious about the stats). At the end of the home & away season, Brisbane, the best-placed team and eventual premier, was about equivalent to Adelaide this year.
The best year, which only just beats this year, is 2011 -- mostly because of Geelong and Collingwood, but with strong support. Only Essendon of the top 8 weren't much chop.
In 2007, Geelong were great but everyone else really, really sucked. A year later, the Cats were still great, and only Hawthorn and St Kilda were any good.
![]()
We've been spoiled for good finals teams this year. And we've been spoiled for a while! The last five years have all been better than the previous thirteen.
The worst year is 2003, when Collingwood made the Grand Final with this team. (That thread is what made me curious about the stats). At the end of the home & away season, Brisbane, the best-placed team and eventual premier, was about equivalent to Adelaide this year.
The best year, which only just beats this year, is 2011 -- mostly because of Geelong and Collingwood, but with strong support. Only Essendon of the top 8 weren't much chop.
In 2007, Geelong were great but everyone else really, really sucked. A year later, the Cats were still great, and only Hawthorn and St Kilda were any good.
Interesting, but the peaks surely don't just freakishly coincide with the presence of new/weak teams in the competition.
Somebody might look at that chart and think "oh 2003, bad finals teams", but isn't it merely suggesting the league was overall more balanced? Likewise, I don't necessarily buy that we've been spoiled since 2011. If all 18 teams were more evenly matched, the squiggle ratings wouldn't be as high across the board, but it doesn't mean the quality of football is lower (nor higher).
Is it fair to say the term squiggle "strength" is slightly misleading?
![]()
We've been spoiled for good finals teams this year. And we've been spoiled for a while! The last five years have all been better than the previous thirteen.
The worst year is 2003, when Collingwood made the Grand Final with this team. (That thread is what made me curious about the stats). At the end of the home & away season, Brisbane, the best-placed team and eventual premier, was about equivalent to Adelaide this year.
The best year, which only just beats this year, is 2011 -- mostly because of Geelong and Collingwood, but with strong support. Only Essendon of the top 8 weren't much chop.
In 2007, Geelong were great but everyone else really, really sucked. A year later, the Cats were still great, and only Hawthorn and St Kilda were any good.
Interesting, but the peaks surely don't just freakishly coincide with the presence of new/weak teams in the competition.
Somebody might look at that chart and think "oh 2003, bad finals teams", but isn't it merely suggesting the league was overall more balanced? Likewise, I don't necessarily buy that we've been spoiled since 2011. If all 18 teams were more evenly matched, the squiggle ratings wouldn't be as high across the board, but it doesn't mean the quality of football is lower (nor higher).
Is it fair to say the term squiggle "strength" is slightly misleading?
Here are the Rain / Min / Max temp for each of the Hawks and WC games for the year
View attachment 179320
Games > 20 C max hawks are 1 - 2
View attachment 179321
games above 20C max, wc are 8 - 2 - 1
What does this mean in terms of the grand final? it means Perth is hotter than Melbourne / Launceston.
I complete agree they are complete irrelevantAwesome
Do you temperatures at time of the match otherwise this list is completely irrelevant
I complete agree they are complete irrelevant
Are we "raging" though? All those predictions are so closeIt's far better being the underdog than the raging favourite
Are we "raging" though? All those predictions are so close