LuvtheKangas
Premium Platinum
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Posts
- 25,675
- Reaction score
- 66,394
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Except he cleary wasn't.
LOL.
And chemicals turn amphibians homosexual.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Except he cleary wasn't.
Nice that you can stay on topic.LOL.
And chemicals turn amphibians homosexual.
That would’ve worked if the democrats let democracy take its place. the party elites still think they own the party and can and choose who’ll be candidate.
the people will walk away if they don’t have a progressive candidate.
I guess that’s why Lt Buttigieg went all my chemical romance in his victory speech.
Nice that you can stay on topic.
If he was definitely guilty he would have been chucked out. There would be iron clad evidence. That fact is there isn't. People have been taking big L's for years now. Russia Hoax is a perfect example. Jean was adament that Boris would be run out and Brexit wouldn't happen. People were adament Morrison wasn't going to be in office. People were adament Trump wouldn't be in office. It's time to realise the fringe minority and the blue check marks on twitter aren't the people. Just a bunch of whiners that are out of touch with the real world.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If he was definitely guilty he would have been chucked out.
It was a sham from start to finish. The Russia probe failed so this was a last shot and grabbing Trump for something. Waste of tax payers money. Everyone wins - republicans and Trump get to shake their heads and say the Democrats have lost the plot. The Democrats get to shake their head and say that Trump is corrupt.No he wouldn't have been, and had it been a Republican House doing it to a Democrat President with a Democratic Senate, they would have acquitted on party lines too.
It was a sham from start to finish. The Russia probe failed so this was a last shot and grabbing Trump for something. Waste of tax payers money. Everyone wins - republicans and Trump get to shake their heads and say the Democrats have lost the plot. The Democrats get to shake their head and say that Trump is corrupt.
If there was definitive proof he would have been out of there. The fact that no one can point to any speaks volumes. It was rushed, ill prepared and Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer made it up as they went along. There should be systems in place like that circus can't happen again just because you don't like the person is in office because it was used as a political tactic, not because he deserved to be impeached.
If they'd allowed witnesses, I'd be with you here.
Let's be honest, he did it, he totally did it, we all know we did it.
Is it a High Crime that requires removal from office, on that meh, maybe, possibly. Probably.
The real story is the bipartisan support for a continuing proxy war in Ukraine.
One thing I've been wondering, is how any "investigation" can vote not to hear witnesses? Seems ridiculous as a concept... I can understand if a individual witness is rules ineligible but not to call any...
The way Bernie talks about Putin I think he’d even support the crazy notion of Ukraine Intermarium.If they'd allowed witnesses, I'd be with you here.
Let's be honest, he did it, he totally did it, we all know we did it.
Is it a High Crime that requires removal from office, on that meh, maybe, possibly. Probably.
The real story is the bipartisan support for a continuing proxy war in Ukraine.
That's a load of shit and you know it. lol, what a joke.If they'd allowed witnesses, I'd be with you here.
Let's be honest, he did it, he totally did it, we all know we did it.
Is it a High Crime that requires removal from office, on that meh, maybe, possibly. Probably.
The real story is the bipartisan support for a continuing proxy war in Ukraine.
Vulnerable, like selling off all the nations assets for personal gain, to OS interests, and claim he’s doing it all to ‘make Russia great again’?Putin came to power on the back of False flag terrorist attacks, murdered the journos exposing him and even okayed the arrest of musicIans.
When someone wrote an article claiming he never went beyond a particular rank in the KGB cos everyone on both sides of the Cold War knew about his taste for little kids and it made him too vulnerable that person was poisoned with Pollonium within months.
He's a skunk.
Putin is the boogie man.. the one everyone uses to enforce the nato mafia tax.I meant vulnerable to the west during the Cold War.
There's a photo of him somewhere as a young man in the crowd while Raygun visits Germany in the 80s.
Poor Mitt. Bitter he couldn't get it done but Trump could. Utah won't take kindly and will probably be ousted. Put his personal bitterness over his party and country. Even his niece called him out on it.Another fact. Today was the first time a republican senator voted to remove a republican president
Putin is the boogie man.. the one everyone uses to enforce the nato mafia tax.
Yep realpolitik, it’s all about the Benjamin’s and watch them all turn on Xi..It's all competing mafias imo.
Poor Mitt. Bitter he couldn't get it done but Trump could. Utah won't take kindly and will probably be ousted. Put his personal bitterness over his party and country. Even his niece called him out on it.
That's a load of shit and you know it. lol, what a joke.
The House rush it to get it done before Christmas. Took 33 days to get it to the Senate. More than enough time to get Bolton in - they did speak to his aide.
John "Bomb Iran" Bolton - hated by democrats until he has something to say...only if you buy his book!
Then when it gets to the Senate the Democrats complain it isn't fair (too bad the House didn't give a fair proceeding - completely one-sided partisan). The Senate Followed the law and both sides were given a trial. It's not their fault that the House rushed it. They were going on the evidence provided.
People can run the narrative that the Senate is unfair but where is the proof from the Democrats? Where is it? Are we supposed to believe that they had nothing but Bolton does? The man Trump fired, that everyone hated, but is now the Democrats best friend - kind of like any terrorist that is killed these days.



