Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread V

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean the CIA's support of Contra-backed cartels in trafficking coke, and guns, to support the Reagan Doctrine's shady anti-communist agenda in Nicaragua. Do you think that was principally motivated by racism? Did the trafficing not affect other poor people of other races? Or was it out of shadowy political, intelligence and economic reasons that the CIA was involved and, consequently, there were negatively repercussions that overwhelmingly affected the Black community because they make up a significant percentage of the poor and population of destitute neighborhoods.


In his CJR piece, Kornbluh said the series was “problematically sourced” and criticized it for “repeatedly promised evidence that, on close reading, it did not deliver.” It failed to definitively connect the story’s key players to the CIA, he noted, and there were inconsistencies in Webb’s timeline of events.

But Kornbluh also uncovered problems with the retaliatory reports described as “balanced” by the CIA. In the case of the L.A. Times, he wrote, the paper “stumbled into some of the same problems of hyperbole, selectivity, and credibility that it was attempting to expose” while ignoring declassified evidence (also neglected by the New York Times and the Washington Post) that lent credibility to Webb’s thesis. “Clearly, there was room to advance the contra/drug/CIA story rather than simply denounce it,” Kornbluh wrote.

The Mercury News was partially responsible “for the sometimes distorted public furor the stories generated,” Kornbluh said, but also achieved “something that neither the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, nor The New York Times had been willing or able to do — revisit a significant story that had been inexplicably abandoned by the mainstream press, report a new dimension to it, and thus put it back on the national agenda where it belongs.”

Yeah that’s it. There’s a direct line between the CIA buying cocaine to fund the rebels and the flood of crack cocaine into poor neighbourhoods. It’s pretty undeniable. Of course the cia isn’t going to admit it. But it’s so obvious that it can’t be ignored.

It’s obvious to anyone with an ounce of street-smarts.



 
Yeah that’s it. There’s a direct line between the CIA buying cocaine to fund the rebels and the flood of crack cocaine into poor neighbourhoods. It’s pretty undeniable. Of course the cia isn’t going to admit it. But it’s so obvious that it can’t be ignored.

It’s obvious to anyone with an ounce of street-smarts.






 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad


All these cancel culture ****wits have no idea about the legislation Florida just passed too.

Actual totalitarian bullshit. Literally undermines the Bill of Rights (which is probably the only valuable part of the US constitution.)

Meanwhile some numpty intellectual spud posts a letter about some elitist upper class twat not wanting to send his kid to an elitist upper class all girls private school (with a Beaver for mascot, lol) and pretends that is somehow the state being oppressive.
 
They didn't push the crack into frigging Westchester did they mate?
Poorer communities are far more likely to put up with cheaper and lower quality products than upper class types in Westchester.

You can peddle higher quality, different, and often more expensive drugs to those that could afford them. Cater to your customer and all that. For example, opioid overuse followed soon after the introduction of cheap crack in the 1980s. Cheap crack and heroin still eventually made it into the middle and upper classes by the early 2000s and has contributed to the opioid crisis we have now, on top of other issues. One addiction leads to another.
It started as a race thing, and now it's a political/money thing.


That is the way I largely see it. It certainly has its overt racial dimensions and heritage, but it soon took on new economic, class and political dimensions that are present today and are largely responsible for its preservation.
 
All these cancel culture *******s have no idea about the legislation Florida just passed too.

Actual totalitarian bullshit. Literally undermines the Bill of Rights (which is probably the only valuable part of the US constitution.)

Meanwhile some numpty intellectual spud posts a letter about some elitist upper class twat not wanting to send his kid to an elitist upper class all girls private school (with a Beaver for mascot, lol) and pretends that is somehow the state being oppressive.

Lotta white male dudes in this thread telling us what sexism and racism is hey.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

View attachment 1115719
Throw in the drug war, poverty and a horrible starting point as the biggest factors. The father, culture and mentality stuff is overplayed quite a bit.
Every one of those things that are scrubbed out is down to the CIA bringing crack into ghettos.
 
That is the way I largely see it. It certainly has its overt racial dimensions and heritage, but it quickly took on economic, class and political dimensions that are present today.

It well & truly morphed past that point decades ago.

Only intellectual morons (wokesters) would run with it (race/drugs) in the contemporary setting.
 
Last edited:
Yeah that’s it. There’s a direct line between the CIA buying cocaine to fund the rebels and the flood of crack cocaine into poor neighbourhoods. It’s pretty undeniable. Of course the cia isn’t going to admit it. But it’s so obvious that it can’t be ignored.

It’s obvious to anyone with an ounce of street-smarts.



It is like one of those commonly known facts.
 
Poorer communities are far more likely to put up with cheaper and lower quality products than upper class types in Westchester.

I find it amazing the intellectual hoops you will jump through to try and pretend systemic racism doesn't exist.

As I keep saying, CRT isn't personally directed at you.

I myself have enormous issues with CRT, largely because I come from a group that is white but has historically been marginalised and discriminated against just as much as POC.

And I've been to places (the Arab world, parts of Asia) where the local POC are just as vicious and racist to say Africans as any white person.

But to pretend systemic racism is/was not a defining characteristic of the Anglophone societies we live in is imply false.

Factually and historically wrong.

Claiming 2+2=5 wrong.
 
Every one of those things that are scrubbed out is down to the CIA bringing crack into ghettos.
Many of them would be solved, but I still think poverty, property devaluation in the inner cities and the overall decline of two-parent (dual-income) families amongst all ethnic groups in the US have continually played a role.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You mean the CIA's support of Contra-backed cartels in trafficking coke, and guns, to support the Reagan Doctrine's shady anti-communist agenda in Nicaragua. Do you think that was principally motivated by racism? Did the trafficing not affect other poor people of other races? Or was it out of shadowy political, intelligence and economic reasons that the CIA was involved and, consequently, there were negatively repercussions that overwhelmingly affected the Black community because they make up a significant percentage of the poor and population of destitute neighborhoods.


In his CJR piece, Kornbluh said the series was “problematically sourced” and criticized it for “repeatedly promised evidence that, on close reading, it did not deliver.” It failed to definitively connect the story’s key players to the CIA, he noted, and there were inconsistencies in Webb’s timeline of events.

But Kornbluh also uncovered problems with the retaliatory reports described as “balanced” by the CIA. In the case of the L.A. Times, he wrote, the paper “stumbled into some of the same problems of hyperbole, selectivity, and credibility that it was attempting to expose” while ignoring declassified evidence (also neglected by the New York Times and the Washington Post) that lent credibility to Webb’s thesis. “Clearly, there was room to advance the contra/drug/CIA story rather than simply denounce it,” Kornbluh wrote.

The Mercury News was partially responsible “for the sometimes distorted public furor the stories generated,” Kornbluh said, but also achieved “something that neither the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, nor The New York Times had been willing or able to do — revisit a significant story that had been inexplicably abandoned by the mainstream press, report a new dimension to it, and thus put it back on the national agenda where it belongs.”
How did Gary Webb shoot himself in the head twice when he committed suicide?
 
I find it amazing the intellectual hoops you will jump through to try and pretend systemic racism doesn't exist.

As I keep saying, CRT isn't personally directed at you.

I myself have enormous issues with CRT, largely because I come from a group that is white but has historically been marginalised and discriminated against just as much as POC.

And I've been to places (the Arab world, parts of Asia) where the local POC are just as vicious and racist to say Africans as any white person.

But to pretend systemic racism is/was not a defining characteristic of the Anglophone societies we live in is imply false.

Factually and historically wrong.

Claiming 2+2=5 wrong.


Then take the lie of race out of the argument and bring the elevator down to the ground floor. It's fundamentally about those with power and those that are denied it via systematic strategies.

Focusing on race alone (or gender, religion, sexual proclivities, etc.) keeps the whole game moving along. ANYTHING to distract from the actual source.

British spawned race patriotism never went away, it's just been repackaged in a more sophisticated manner.

Universal libertarianism is the only answer.
 
Many of them would be solved, but I still think poverty, property devaluation in the inner cities and the overall decline of two-parent (dual-income) families amongst all ethnic groups in the US have continually played a role.
Why? White flight, no jobs left cos of globalisation and a massive over representation of black men in the private prison system (and graveyards) which is a form of modern day slavery.
 
Then take the lie of race out of the argument and bring the elevator down to the ground floor. It's fundamentally about those with power and those that are denied it via systematic strategies.

Focusing on race alone (or gender, religion, sexual proclivities, etc.) keeps the whole game moving along. ANYTHING to distract from the actual source.

British spawned race patriotism never went away, it's just been repackaged in a more sophisticated manner.

Universal libertarianism is the only answer.

Agree on all but the answer.

To take on power structures as strong and established as those you describe (which I agree with) requires solidarity, not individualism.

That said, I certainly agree in the libertarianism of the mind to break free of them.

But in terms of actions, it needs solidarity and communal action.

Otherwise those power structures just use the old divide and rule tactic
 
Then take the lie of race out of the argument and bring the elevator down to the ground floor. It's fundamentally about those with power and those that are denied it via systematic strategies.

Focusing on race alone (or gender, religion, sexual proclivities, etc.) keeps the whole game moving along. ANYTHING to distract from the actual source.

British spawned race patriotism never went away, it's just been repackaged in a more sophisticated manner.

Universal libertarianism is the only answer.
Lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top