- Joined
- Jun 11, 2007
- Posts
- 34,242
- Reaction score
- 29,555
- Location
- Victoria
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Bayern, Milan, Boston Celtics
Really liking Knights so far. Cannot pick a fault from day 1.
I had doubts about letting Bradley go so young without trialling him in the new environment, but this draft has more than allayed that concern
The skills and fitness talk is promising. We have been pretty bad with delivery in the past few years.
good drafting.
i expect to see in the next year or so McPhee pushed into a wing role and his athleticism used to attack rather than defend.
Fletcher and Michael's retirement in the next 2 years has been covered if any 3 of Ryder, Danniher, Myer, Pears or Gumbleton can pull off the positions. We already have a good clue on two of them, plus Pears was rated the best defender of the draft, so thats gotta count for something.
The Johns experiment will be interesting.
A lot of mobility in our talls now. The only two i can think of who dont move much are Laycock and Mal.
Lloyd, Lucas, Fletch, Hille, Ryder, Gumbleton, Johns all move well, and reports are these kids do too.
i would have liked to have seen bellchambers taken with the last pick. unless we have something lined up in the next draft for another ruckman, but i cant think of who.
midfield will be fine if we work on skills over the summer.
McVeigh, Stanton, Watson, Winderlich, Davey, Lovett, Slattery and JJ will provide us with decent depth. nothing geelong or west coast style, but if we can pull off what the pies did this year with their unknowns, and get our back and forward lines firing, we may not have to win with run. Just make good with our delivery and let our fire power win it for us.
as stated earlier, my concerns over our ruck stocks havent abated since barnes' retirement. im not sold on Hille as a ruck (i do like his movement around the ground at times though) and laycock still seems a year off and lacks a lot of around the ground quality. But he is a great tall target when we need a mark.
Overall i would put us top 10 at the moment. Nowhere near top 4, and very shady for top 6.
We dont have the problems of culture and scoring/defending depth that the bulldogs, blues and tigers have.
I support the apparent one man view (mine) that adelaide are on thin ice.
Saints and Freo will compete with us for improvement. Lions will steam ahead methinks.
Swans are 50/50.
I can see us finishing above the blues, tigers, crows, swans, dockers and dogs next year.
Roos are an unknown quantity too.
I had doubts about letting Bradley go so young without trialling him in the new environment, but this draft has more than allayed that concern
The skills and fitness talk is promising. We have been pretty bad with delivery in the past few years.
good drafting.
i expect to see in the next year or so McPhee pushed into a wing role and his athleticism used to attack rather than defend.
Fletcher and Michael's retirement in the next 2 years has been covered if any 3 of Ryder, Danniher, Myer, Pears or Gumbleton can pull off the positions. We already have a good clue on two of them, plus Pears was rated the best defender of the draft, so thats gotta count for something.
The Johns experiment will be interesting.
A lot of mobility in our talls now. The only two i can think of who dont move much are Laycock and Mal.
Lloyd, Lucas, Fletch, Hille, Ryder, Gumbleton, Johns all move well, and reports are these kids do too.
i would have liked to have seen bellchambers taken with the last pick. unless we have something lined up in the next draft for another ruckman, but i cant think of who.
midfield will be fine if we work on skills over the summer.
McVeigh, Stanton, Watson, Winderlich, Davey, Lovett, Slattery and JJ will provide us with decent depth. nothing geelong or west coast style, but if we can pull off what the pies did this year with their unknowns, and get our back and forward lines firing, we may not have to win with run. Just make good with our delivery and let our fire power win it for us.
as stated earlier, my concerns over our ruck stocks havent abated since barnes' retirement. im not sold on Hille as a ruck (i do like his movement around the ground at times though) and laycock still seems a year off and lacks a lot of around the ground quality. But he is a great tall target when we need a mark.
Overall i would put us top 10 at the moment. Nowhere near top 4, and very shady for top 6.
We dont have the problems of culture and scoring/defending depth that the bulldogs, blues and tigers have.
I support the apparent one man view (mine) that adelaide are on thin ice.
Saints and Freo will compete with us for improvement. Lions will steam ahead methinks.
Swans are 50/50.
I can see us finishing above the blues, tigers, crows, swans, dockers and dogs next year.
Roos are an unknown quantity too.




) However Myers with Pick 6 was just silly. Why every single year do we get a tall player with our first draft pick. In fact this year we got 3 out of 3 tall players. Surely Palmer with Pick 6 would have made more sence as we need to inject class into our mid IMO. We have more tall players than we know what to do with now. Lets just hope that next year we finally use our first choice to get a quality mid!
Some people have no clue. You need to point it out for them, dont you
