Santos L Helper
Cancelled
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2001
- Posts
- 4,993
- Reaction score
- 49
- Location
- Arrogant Prick
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
I've got to reply to some of these comments with some facts.
Bee, the majority of people who break into homes are NOT smack addicts. The majority of people who break into homes that we hear about are smack addicts. There is absolutely no modern research to back up the 'addictive personality' theory......absolutely none. You also suggest that any recreational use of illicit drug will eventually lead to heroin use. This is simply not true. There is a huge gap between recreational use and addiction, in fact most common psychoactive drugs used by people before they tried heroin were alcohol and tobacco.
TT, Alcohol and tobacco are stronger drugs than heroin etc. Maybe you mean the more illegal the drug, the weaker the mind, in your opinion?
More people die from purer heroin rather than cheap heroin. It is a myth that cheap heroin kills more. Surely the more people addicted to a drug would indicate that it's stronger? Then alcohol and tobacco cover that criteria. I agree that alcohol is a weakness, and I believe that I have this weakness too. The way I see it is that any weakness is as bad as another weakness where this subject is concerned.
I agree that it is stupid, rather than weak.
The tougher policing may drive up the price, but all this means is that crime rises and more addicts then resort to other drugs, like prescription painkillers, which are infinitely more dangerous.
I know that you would say that it's their risk, but you know I'll disagree with you on that too.
Macca, you may be very surprised at the amount of recreational heroin users in society. Just because we don't know them doesn't mean they aren't there.
No persoanl attacks here. As I said, I am in a position to give some facts, so I've done that. This subject is a tough one.
Bee, the majority of people who break into homes are NOT smack addicts. The majority of people who break into homes that we hear about are smack addicts. There is absolutely no modern research to back up the 'addictive personality' theory......absolutely none. You also suggest that any recreational use of illicit drug will eventually lead to heroin use. This is simply not true. There is a huge gap between recreational use and addiction, in fact most common psychoactive drugs used by people before they tried heroin were alcohol and tobacco.
TT, Alcohol and tobacco are stronger drugs than heroin etc. Maybe you mean the more illegal the drug, the weaker the mind, in your opinion?
More people die from purer heroin rather than cheap heroin. It is a myth that cheap heroin kills more. Surely the more people addicted to a drug would indicate that it's stronger? Then alcohol and tobacco cover that criteria. I agree that alcohol is a weakness, and I believe that I have this weakness too. The way I see it is that any weakness is as bad as another weakness where this subject is concerned.
I agree that it is stupid, rather than weak.
The tougher policing may drive up the price, but all this means is that crime rises and more addicts then resort to other drugs, like prescription painkillers, which are infinitely more dangerous.
I know that you would say that it's their risk, but you know I'll disagree with you on that too.
Macca, you may be very surprised at the amount of recreational heroin users in society. Just because we don't know them doesn't mean they aren't there.
No persoanl attacks here. As I said, I am in a position to give some facts, so I've done that. This subject is a tough one.



