Remove this Banner Ad

Re-clarification from Essendon spin machine

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

teagueyubeauty

Norm Smith Medallist
Oct 5, 2004
9,353
23,414
Somewhere there
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Liverpool, Yankees
Now that we know Hawker83 is Ian Hanke,
[ Ian Hanke has personally replied on Twitter: he denies this is him. Chief ]


i think its prudent to ask for clarification on the web of spin that's been coming out of the club since this sordid story started.
Simple questions that have been reported to be untrue (whether they are or not isn't the point) and allow the spin machine to put forward their revised position or debunk the "facts" as we know them now.
I'll try :eek: and keep up with the thread and modify my post of all the questions we wouldn't mind being reclarified after they've been debunked initially.
I'll start:

A press release came out of the club saying the meeting with Shane Charters on the Gold Coast in late 2011 was a "chance meeting", this has been found to be a fabricated lie with Shane Charters saying he was invited to attend. Mr Hanke, what is your new position on this?
 
Now that we know Hawker83 is Ian Hanke, i think its prudent to ask for clarification on the web of spin that's been coming out of the club since this sordid story started.
Simple questions that have been reported to be untrue (whether they are or not isn't the point) and allow the spin machine to put forward their revised position or debunk the "facts" as we know them now.
I'll try :eek: and keep up with the thread and modify my post of all the questions we wouldn't mind being reclarified after they've been debunked initially.
I'll start:

A press release came out of the club saying the meeting with Shane Charters on the Gold Coast in late 2011 was a "chance meeting", this has been found to be a fabricated lie with Shane Charters saying he was invited to attend. Mr Hanke, what is your new position on this?

He is? o_O and we know this how?
 
Surely the presence of Essendon PR Consultants on Big Footy, Twitter etc is of no surprise to anyone. They do more than just spend all their time reassuring Hird, that he has done nothing wrong and it will all be fine, when everyone finds out what the PR Hacks want the public to know.
 
Not saying that it wouldn't happen, it would be prudent to do so, but they would normally do this incognito.
However, there are many questions and untruths that have come out of those press releases and its 99.9% sure that this user is Hird's spin doctor so now it would be nice to get some clarification on these press releases.
The other side of this, is for all those "journalists" who also frequent these boards to start asking the questions about debunked 'Truths" or "Half Truths" from the spin coming out of Essendon and actually do their job....

I would prefer this didn't become another "chat" thread, instead it being just a thread on the questions you want answered;)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Who was he invited by?

Steven Dank, who was a senior manager of the ESSENDON FOOTBALL CLUB, who was employed and given Carte Blanche by JAMES HIRD.

that's if we believe the Essendon supporters view of events
 
Steven Dank, who was a senior manager of the ESSENDON FOOTBALL CLUB, who was employed and given Carte Blanche by JAMES HIRD.
Ahh, so Steven Dank was the one who invited him, most likely without James Hird's knowledge. Thought so.

teagueyubeauty, any other lies you would like the Essendon PR spinning dishwasher tumble dryer machine to clarify?
 
Ahh, so Steven Dank was the one who invited him, most likely without James Hird's knowledge. Thought so.

teagueyubeauty, any other lies you would like the Essendon PR spinning dishwasher tumble dryer machine to clarify?

lol.
how can you think it was a coincidence? dank only invited charters, why? because hird told him to. its not that hard to see.
I know I was upset when carlton got done for cheating but, geeee these essendon supporters are in denial bad.
 
Ahh, so Steven Dank was the one who invited him, most likely without James Hird's knowledge. Thought so.

teagueyubeauty, any other lies you would like the Essendon PR spinning dishwasher tumble dryer machine to clarify?

If I invite someone to a function, then it is a given that my boss gave me the authority to invite him/her otherwise im on deep shit, not sharing margaritas with pink umbrellas poolside with him discussing a drugs programme
 
lol.
how can you think it was a coincidence? dank only invited charters, why? because hird told him to. its not that hard to see.
I know I was upset when carlton got done for cheating but, geeee these essendon supporters are in denial bad.
Because they were mates? Because Dank was still trying to convince Hird that AOD was awesome, and having Charter there to help re-enforce it's awesomeness could've got Hirdy over the line, considering Hird and Charter went waaaay back? Hird and Essendon were up there for a pre-season training camp, not a peptide conference.

Actually, it is hard to see, because there's no evidence other than your imagination that Hird knew Charters was going to be on the Coast at the same time as them.

If I invite someone to a function, then it is a given that my boss gave me the authority to invite him/her otherwise im on deep shit, not sharing margaritas with pink umbrellas poolside with him discussing a drugs programme
Um, who said that Dank ever told Hird that he invited Charter? Charter was there with his family and we were there for a pre-season camp; you could've forgiven Hird for thinking that it was indeed a chance meeting (not knowing that Danky had set it all up).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

vj9o.jpg

who is the sucker? hanke for buying one of those "luxury" apartments in southbank with w@nker kitchen. or Essendon for paying him lawyer per hour billings to buy said apartment. or for wearing a rive gauche condom on his head. i thought they were for first year liberal arts students.

luxury is an oxymoron in the modern economy when marketeers have co-opted for commodity banality. like buying something damien hirst stole out of an abattoir
 
I wonder if this Ian Hanke outing will make it to the media? It is a funny story.

After talking with rfctiger74 for a while I'm convinced Hird knew nothing about Hamilton's drug program.


i got a feeling it will make it to crikey. and that will get traction in the wider media.

half lies, mistruths, rhetoric, and talking points.

all we need is one of robbo's lines about "throwing grenades"
 
I'm just waiting for the crap about Essendon paying for the drugs but Dank using them elsewhere spin to hit the media, what's the bet that Robbo/Hun/SEN will run something along those fanciful lines.
 
hanke does pretty shitty sock puppets.

puppetry of the penis > hawker puppet

you never studied Public Strategies and Livestrong interns and how they prepared the field, and bombed and astroturfed online. this must be one of the most hairbrained and doggone incompetent project by a spinner. we got the spinner needing to commission a crisis communications consultant. :confused:
 
WTF? I'd never heard of Ian Hanke until this morning.

I'm surprised people haven't heard the of the parallel criminal investigation rumour. It actually explains a lot.

And as to my motivation - as I have said many times, I hate witch hunts and kangaroo courts. IMO the public has been played like a fool with selective leaking designed to push an agenda (we can speculate on who & what agenda). I've worked in the justice system for many years & I can smell a miscarriage of justice a mile off.

Public opinion has been manipulated to such an extent that the integrity of the investigation and any resulting sanctions is now blown.

If this were a criminal case it would never get to court & the people 'close to the investigation' would be sacked.

If it were a civil case....say players vs the club it might.
 
WTF? I'd never heard of Ian Hanke until this morning.

I'm surprised people haven't heard the of the parallel criminal investigation rumour. It actually explains a lot.

And as to my motivation - as I have said many times, I hate witch hunts and kangaroo courts. IMO the public has been played like a fool with selective leaking designed to push an agenda (we can speculate on who & what agenda). I've worked in the justice system for many years & I can smell a miscarriage of justice a mile off.

Public opinion has been manipulated to such an extent that the integrity of the investigation and any resulting sanctions is now blown.

If this were a criminal case it would never get to court & the people 'close to the investigation' would be sacked.


witchhunts and kangaroo courts. you sound just like Armstrong did during his fall. surprised to see you back, i thought you might just be taking your cricket bat and running home with your head between your legs dude
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

i got a feeling it will make it to crikey. and that will get traction in the wider media.

half lies, mistruths, rhetoric, and talking points.

all we need is one of robbo's lines about "throwing grenades"
I have been listening to robbo lately. And I have come away with the feeling he is not nearly as dumb and gullible as he comes across. He will print and repeat some pretty dubious claims as if they are true because - he was told by the source. But I note he gives the unvarnished version from the person (whether it be Dank, Charter etc). Then he says something like "It's hard to know what's true." To me he is just leaving it up to the listener, and also implying "Beware!"

It was curious he didn't buy into Whately's breaking news the other day.
 
who is the sucker? hanke for buying one of those "luxury" apartments in southbank with w@nker kitchen. or Essendon for paying him lawyer per hour billings to buy said apartment. or for wearing a rive gauche condom on his head. i thought they were for first year liberal arts students.
r

Definitely that one.
 
I have been listening to robbo lately. And I have come away with the feeling he is not nearly as dumb and gullible as he comes across. He will print and repeat some pretty dubious claims as if they are true because - he was told by the source. But I note he gives the unvarnished version from the person (whether it be Dank, Charter etc). Then he says something like "It's hard to know what's true." To me he is just leaving it up to the listener, and also implying "Beware!"

It was curious he didn't buy into Whately's breaking news the other day.

not much of a compliment. working off a very low base, improve, merely low base
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top