- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Posts
- 6,868
- Reaction score
- 7,993
- Location
- Under the fridge
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland FC
Is he worth holding on to? in the few games i seen him he looked to have good potential, but has he? is he a good player or not? 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Geelong - Rd 12 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 69% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC


He hasn't been given the same chance that a Raines (for example) has...just intermittent games. I believe had he been given more than one game at a time said:cmon fella, theres good reason he hasnt been given same opportunities as Raines , coz he aint got the ability....I have nothing against the kid, GM lauded the commitment of the young fella, unfortunately just not up to it..he really struggled to make an impact at Coburg letalone afl ...good luck to him
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Thats crap.Rainsy said:I was lucky enough to speak to him last friday night when i served him at a resturant in Richmond and he said he was ready for a big pre season and how he had been to the gym and all that jazz. Very nice bloke may i add, however if he is saying all this does it sound as though Terry has given him one last chance or when will his fate be heard? when are the delistments usually made
There isnt just one Thomas Roach!Darth_Tiger said:any chance we will pick him up in the rookie draft?
What do you have against Thomas Roach???Truetiger said:Rookie Draft is to good for Roach.
Nah hes a defender.tigerboyz said:Better off picking up his chubby taller brother who can kick goals apparently.
Thomas has had less oppurtunaty than Kel Moore who is being retained on our list.tugga said:Why put Roach on the rookie list when he has had ample opportunity to prove himself. He only got the gig on the list in the first place because of feel-good propaganda crap in Spud the Dud's time.
Put an untried kid there and see how he goes. If he fails then he's achieved the same as Tom Roach.
Well first of all Braun was in some pretty good form leading up to that match and was dominating alot of games including 35 disposals against Brisbane two weeks before.The B said:Mini Me...if he is so worthy of keeping his spot on the richmond list, how come he didn't perform when he needed to, round 22 against West Coast. Everything was in his favour...he had 100 minutes of game time, nice conditions for footy and he was playing on a wing at the MCG for gods sake, hence so much SPACE!!! For a quick and hard running winger, 5 possessions if it was even that is not good enough. Where Cam Howatt on the otherhand gets his 20 pluss possie games with less game time!!! Keeping Braun to 15 possessions to isnt much of an achievment aswell? So can u explain that Mini Me?
I was just replying to "The B".PLSC said:how about you take your lips off tommys butt
fair enough you know him and he is a mate, but its footy
get over it
mini_me316 said:Thomas has had less oppurtunaty than Kel Moore who is being retained on our list.You reckon?
Moore's been injury plagued.
What's Roach's excuse?
Moore has been given more games in the ones than Thomas because:
(1) in his brief time at Coburg (between injuries) he has shown more than Roach.
(2) He plays a role we are deficient in. Roach doesn't.
Roach has had ample opportunity at Coburg. Unfortunately most of the Coburg listed players showed more than him.
Exactly Moore has had an injury plagued carrer, where as Tom hasn't had so many injuries, but the simple fact that Moore can't seem to stay fit for a number of weeks has got to mean something doesn't it?One-eyed Tiger said:You reckon?
Moore's been injury plagued.
What's Roach's excuse?
Moore has been given more games in the ones than Thomas because:
(1) in his brief time at Coburg (between injuries) he has shown more than Roach.
(2) He plays a role we are deficient in. Roach doesn't.
Roach has had ample opportunity at Coburg. Unfortunately most of the Coburg listed players showed more than him.